GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,865
- 44,583
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
That's more an admission he was horribly handled in Anaheim and it's going to take a whole season to fix him. Which is what it took to fix Risto.Charlie was saying even before the season started internally they had no meaningful expectations again for Drysdale this year. If you go to keep writing off seasons that’s probably a tell but I don’t think they see it that way.
Cutter really limited the options, no different than Carolina accepting a 2nd 7 3rd for Fox, even when they knew he was going to be a top D-man after a great college season.Smartest move is to deal him while he’s half ass healthy.
That would require the admittance of a mistake however.
Briere needs to be rightfully torched for that trade. Nobody in their right mind thinks that Jamie Drysdale + a 2nd was the best that could be found for a 5OA - coming off a strong WJC.
Even if Cutter limited the options.
That's more an admission he was horribly handled in Anaheim and it's going to take a whole season to fix him. Which is what it took to fix Risto.
They're very different players, with Drysdale, it's learning defensive fundamentals, but more important, when to take risks on offense. Risto had to learn positioning and to stop chasing hits.
Cutter really limited the options, no different than Carolina accepting a 2nd 7 3rd for Fox, even when they knew he was going to be a top D-man after a great college season.
Flyers got a 2nd and Drysdale for Gauthier. And no one thinks he'll turn out as good as Fox.
Cutter really limited the options, no different than Carolina accepting a 2nd 7 3rd for Fox, even when they knew he was going to be a top D-man after a great college season.
Fox and Gauthier have nothing in common. Fox, as a 3rd rounder, was entering his senior year, had the academic card to play, and only wanted to go to one team. Gauthier was a top 5 pick, was early in his sophomore year, and was suffering a case of ELC blue balls to the point his trade list was 18-20 teams, according to Seravalli.
That's more an admission he was horribly handled in Anaheim and it's going to take a whole season to fix him. Which is what it took to fix Risto.
They're very different players, with Drysdale, it's learning defensive fundamentals, but more important, when to take risks on offense. Risto had to learn positioning and to stop chasing hits.
Cutter really limited the options, no different than Carolina accepting a 2nd 7 3rd for Fox, even when they knew he was going to be a top D-man after a great college season.
Flyers got a 2nd and Drysdale for Gauthier. And no one thinks he'll turn out as good as Fox.
I have only watched a few games this season and last while Drysdale has been in the lineup, but I honestly cannot tell you what are his positives are supposed to be. Maybe I have just missed them in my viewings.To me, it seems like people talk about the idea of Jamie Drysdale more than what he actually does on the ice.
He doesn't even generate offense. He's not good at anything at 5v5. He has no positives. Every Defenseman rebuild they've done involved getting improved defensive play at the cost of the other end of the ice. That's not even an option here. There are no knobs to turn. His strengths still don't translate. He can't pass my personal baseline for having any hope in NHL YEAR FIVE.
I have only watched a few games this season and last while Drysdale has been in the lineup, but I honestly cannot tell you what are his positives are supposed to be. Maybe I have just missed them in my viewings.
He has bad reads in the d-zone. Fires passes at people like the puck is a grenade. He is awful at keeping the puck in the o-zone, and terrible at getting to the lanes and cycling. He's not physical at all.
Like, I know he's still young(ish), but what is the upside on his play here?
They all knew the Flyers had no choice.Copy and pasted from the last 18-20 times you've brought this up:
I don't see any great deal on the table that Briere turned down.
The lack of trade rumors suggests few teams were seriously interested.
That’s what we’re going with here? Really?They all knew the Flyers had no choice.
There are zero rumors of great deals that were turned down.
"The Philadelphia Flyers reportedly offered the Habs a trade that involved Gauthier in exchange for the fifth overall pick at the 2023 NHL Entry ..."
According to the journalist's information, the CH saw Gauthier as a 5th overall pick from a weak draft while MTL held the 5th pick of a draft they considered strong. Thus, the offer was not sufficient in Hughes' eyes.» It was also learned that the Flyers would have also drafted David Reinbacher with this 5th overall pick. [note, Briere knew Arizona would not take Michkov b/c he made it clear he would not sign with them] In short, the general manager of the Montreal Canadiens seems to have made an excellent decision, especially now that we know Gauthier did not want to play for a Canadian team.
[Flyers would have had to sweeten the deal, but the impression was the Habs simply didn't want him so Flyers would have had to overpay to make that deal]
"Scott Hartnell said a lot of the teams that were on Cutter Gauthier’s trade list, declined offers because of the way he went about the whole situation and his attitude towards the Flyers."
"Michael Russo and Joe Smith of The Athletic ($) did their end-of-season Minnesota Wild mailbag, and one reader asked them the chances that Marco Rossi gets traded. As part of their response, Russo and Smith divulged that the Wild were after Gauthier in a prospective Flyers trade before he was shipped to Anaheim."
[two points, timing mattered, b/c if it was Rossi, he had a horrible start as an undersized center, 1 point in 19g in 2022-23. Flyers were offering Gauthier that summer. However, by the Drysdale trade he had 22 points in 35g by Jan 1. So did the Flyers turn Minn down in the summer and/or Minn turn the Flyers down in January? Rossi is listed at 5'9 182]
I don't see any great deal on the table that Briere turned down.
The lack of trade rumors suggests few teams were seriously interested.
Since no one would have made a deal without confirming with Gauthier that he'd come there, he could veto any trade he had second thoughts about, which would have discouraged offers.
If he waits until the 2024 draft, Gauthier is only 2 years from being a UFA, so teams would have been more wary of trading for him. So it's doubtful his value increases by waiting.
Flyers would have received the #37 pick if they let him walk in two years, so Briere probably set that as the floor, in effect Anaheim's 2nd.
No choice to what, find somewhere in the next TWO YEARS to trade Gauthier?They all knew the Flyers had no choice.
There are zero rumours of lots of things. The fact there are zero rumours has no bearing on the reality of the situation, save for the spin you try and give it.There are zero rumors of great deals that were turned down.
No choice to what, find somewhere in the next TWO YEARS to trade Gauthier?
They all knew the Flyers had no choice.
There are zero rumors of great deals that were turned down.
"The Philadelphia Flyers reportedly offered the Habs a trade that involved Gauthier in exchange for the fifth overall pick at the 2023 NHL Entry ..."
According to the journalist's information, the CH saw Gauthier as a 5th overall pick from a weak draft while MTL held the 5th pick of a draft they considered strong. Thus, the offer was not sufficient in Hughes' eyes.» It was also learned that the Flyers would have also drafted David Reinbacher with this 5th overall pick. [note, Briere knew Arizona would not take Michkov b/c he made it clear he would not sign with them] In short, the general manager of the Montreal Canadiens seems to have made an excellent decision, especially now that we know Gauthier did not want to play for a Canadian team.
[Flyers would have had to sweeten the deal, but the impression was the Habs simply didn't want him so Flyers would have had to overpay to make that deal]
"Scott Hartnell said a lot of the teams that were on Cutter Gauthier’s trade list, declined offers because of the way he went about the whole situation and his attitude towards the Flyers."
"Michael Russo and Joe Smith of The Athletic ($) did their end-of-season Minnesota Wild mailbag, and one reader asked them the chances that Marco Rossi gets traded. As part of their response, Russo and Smith divulged that the Wild were after Gauthier in a prospective Flyers trade before he was shipped to Anaheim."
[two points, timing mattered, b/c if it was Rossi, he had a horrible start as an undersized center, 1 point in 19g in 2022-23. Flyers were offering Gauthier that summer. However, by the Drysdale trade he had 22 points in 35g by Jan 1. So did the Flyers turn Minn down in the summer and/or Minn turn the Flyers down in January? Rossi is listed at 5'9 182]
I don't see any great deal on the table that Briere turned down.
The lack of trade rumors suggests few teams were seriously interested.
Since no one would have made a deal without confirming with Gauthier that he'd come there, he could veto any trade he had second thoughts about, which would have discouraged offers.
If he waits until the 2024 draft, Gauthier is only 2 years from being a UFA, so teams would have been more wary of trading for him. So it's doubtful his value increases by waiting.
Flyers would have received the #37 pick if they let him walk in two years, so Briere probably set that as the floor, in effect Anaheim's 2nd.
If there were real offers on the table, odds are they'd eventually leak out.I do remember the Flyers story was they told teams to stay quiet to be fair to Gauthier. It was praised by the local media as a front office masterclass. Now, it means no one was interested (18-20 teams!!!!) in one of the more valuable ELCs in the league? And your evidence is….?
Word for the wise: watching CHL games is less of a waste of time than this.
If there were real offers on the table, odds are they'd eventually leak out.
Every team has reporters with inside sources that eventually break these stories, especially after a high profile trade like this one.
Or the Flyers only bothered talking to the one team that had the one player their one advisor was still super thrilled about.
I think the simple solution is that they just valued Drysdale that much.
Which is still bad. Very, very bad!
How did we know there were multiple offers for Risto?So to review (my apparent new catchphrase):
There was only one real offer on the table for a highly-regarded prospect with an entire ELC still to come.
Rasmus Ristolainen had multiple offers of a 1st round pick+ on the table as a Rental. I think Dreger said 4 of them? Something like that.