Confirmed with Link: Flyers trade Cutter Gauthier to Anaheim for Jamie Drysdale and 2025 2nd round pick

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
If I remember correctly, the question with Gauither was always whether he'd remain at center or have to play LW. What made him a "safe" pick was his floor was probably a 30 goal LW.

I think one reason the Flyers weren't desperate to sign him after his freshman year was he didn't show a lot at center and without a big jump, was going to play LW in the NHL. He definitely needed the 2nd year in college and would probably have sulked if sent to the AHL.

His floor was never 30 goal LW. Never, ever. Not then, not now, and the fact that amateur dorks on the internet are better at seeing that than the Flyers is why the Flyers are always terrible with no light at the end of the tunnel.

Having him do enough in college to be overvalued, having the chance to turn him into a much better prospect, and deliberately chasing an Eakins-ruined Drysdale who has the operational efficiency of an exploding runaway diesel is a worse whiff and failure than the initial pick.
 
If I remember correctly, the question with Gauither was always whether he'd remain at center or have to play LW. What made him a "safe" pick was his floor was probably a 30 goal LW.

I think one reason the Flyers weren't desperate to sign him after his freshman year was he didn't show a lot at center and without a big jump, was going to play LW in the NHL. He definitely needed the 2nd year in college and would probably have sulked if sent to the AHL.
Pure speculation to push a narrative.
 
Lolz. Fetching some data from nhl.com/stats. Forward since 2000-2001. 25 years

In this time span, 265 forwards reached a >= 30 goal mark in at least one season.
In this time span, 166 wingers reached a >= 30 goal mark in at least one season.
In this time span, 79 left wingers reached a >= 30 goal mark in at least one season.

There were on average 31 forwards per season to reach >= 30 goal mark.
There were on average 20 wingers per season to reach >= 30 goal mark.
There were on average 10 left wingers per season to reach >= 30 goal mark.

163 forwards / 100 wingers / 47 left wingers reached said goal mark in more than one season in said time span.
And that was his floor? F that

1729800333937.png
 
If I remember correctly, the question with Gauither was always whether he'd remain at center or have to play LW. What made him a "safe" pick was his floor was probably a 30 goal LW.

I think one reason the Flyers weren't desperate to sign him after his freshman year was he didn't show a lot at center and without a big jump, was going to play LW in the NHL. He definitely needed the 2nd year in college and would probably have sulked if sent to the AHL.
I don't know why you keep saying his floor is a 30 goal left wing, but I can assure Gauthier's floor is much lower than that.
 
Well we know Flyer fans are unlikely to be chanting "Jamie's better". Drysdale will probably be -25 by January.

I get the pile on the org and Drysdale, but he put up 30 plus points in the NHL at 18 years old. Everybody here is projecting Buium as some Norris caliber D, forgetting that at 18 Drysdale was viewed similarly, if not better. Buium can just as easily suffer injuries or struggle in a much tougher league until he’s 24. In fact, it’s likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleachdrinker
But, I thought we didn't need a #1D stud like Buium because we have small D like Drysdale, York and Andrae already?

Note that ALL of the Flyers are minuses so far, except Deslaurier-Poehling-Hathaway! LOL!

Philadelphia Flyers Club Stats | 2024 - 2025 | Philadelphia Flyers
Everyone needs a 1D stud even if they have one but arent we really getting ahead of ourselves with him being that. I live in Denver and have caught a few of his games. He is really good but plays on a team that is materally better than most of their opponents. Additionally he is going to a team that is waay better than anything Drysdale or York have ever played on as pros. Finally given the gigantic organizational whole at center and the KO drama, to me it seems like passing on him was an easy choice.

I know this sounds weird but Drysdale reminds me of the Dman equivalent of TK. He is all over the place, never seeming to be where he is supposed to and makes a lot of bone headed plays but does have undeniable skills. And of course Dman is a much tougher position than wing plus the injuries. I'm willing to be patient and hope Shaw can teach him how to play better.
 
Last edited:
I think if Dickinson fell, they would have jumped on him.
More of the prototype 1D, and a perfect pairing with Bonk.

Luchanko is probably their prototype top 6 center, full sized, elite speed, two way player who can cover for scoring wings with defensive issues. I think next season you'll see Luchanko and Michkov joined at the hip.

Ideally, they land another top six center in the 2025 draft, make Frost the 3C (if they keep him) and move Couts to LW in a couple years.
 
Copium.

Forget equivalents, I think I would rather take my chances with TK actually playing defense over Drysdale. That’s how bad it’s been.

And no, Buium was a much better and more accomplished prospect than Drysdale entering the draft. Yes he played on a stacked team, but he led the country in TOI as a draft eligible defenseman. They were stacked in large part because of his impacts (especially in the playoffs).

Oh and he scored more per game in college hockey as a defenseman than the player they picked in the first round as a 1C in the OHL. In no way shape or form was that an “easy choice”.
 
Haller was very solid. Only if JD can become solid.
Seeing a trend here that previous D men on the Flyers that were mostly serviceable and not needle movers were still better than what Drysdale has shown so far in his short and oft injured career. Even Ryan Parent had a least one good playoff stint with the Flyers until his back forced him to retire...
 
  • Like
Reactions: blackjackmulligan
Let's see what Shaw can do with Drysdale.
Anaheim makes the Flyers look competent the last decade.

Zegras (#9) regressed, Lundestrom, Max Jones and Larson (all 1st rd picks) never developed, Steel (1st rd) played better after he left. McTavish (#3) hasn't developed past 3rd line forward. Jacob Perreault is a flop.
Terry (5th rd) did emerge as a top forward at age 24.
Comtois (2nd rd) had a good season at 22, then went backwards.

They're awful at drafting and/or they're awful at development.
 
I think if Dickinson fell, they would have jumped on him.
More of the prototype 1D, and a perfect pairing with Bonk.

Bonk doesn't project as a top pairing defenseman. Every scouting report I've seen had him as a top 4 (one had him as bottom pairing) and that he doesn't have any particular skills that stand out, but was the "safest" defensive pick in the 1st round.

Of course, he can always develop and become a top pairing defenseman over time. But nothing to date says that it is a likely outcome.
 
Bonk doesn't project as a top pairing defenseman. Every scouting report I've seen had him as a top 4 (one had him as bottom pairing) and that he doesn't have any particular skills that stand out, but was the "safest" defensive pick in the 1st round.

Of course, he can always develop and become a top pairing defenseman over time. But nothing to date says that it is a likely outcome.
He's been playing with Dickinson for two years, I think as a pair they'd be fine, and that would give you 2 solid pairs that could eat the lion's share of defensive minutes. You don't need a true #1 if you have two pairs that can hold their own in any situation and play big minutes. See Florida.

I think Briere would like to find a LHD to pair with Bonk who can play 22-23 minutes a night.
Doubt it's Andrae, and no one else in the system.

If Seeler/McDonald - Drysdale is your 3rd pair, you can shelter Drysdale and use him to best advantage (the way teams use Ghost the last few years). If he doesn't work out, replace with Gill or another RHD. It's much easier to fill out a 3rd pair playing 12 ES minutes in sheltered situations than one playing 15-18 ES minutes.
 
I think if Dickinson fell, they would have jumped on him.
More of the prototype 1D, and a perfect pairing with Bonk.

Luchanko is probably their prototype top 6 center, full sized, elite speed, two way player who can cover for scoring wings with defensive issues. I think next season you'll see Luchanko and Michkov joined at the hip.

Ideally, they land another top six center in the 2025 draft, make Frost the 3C (if they keep him) and move Couts to LW in a couple years.
that's terrifying
 
Copium.

Forget equivalents, I think I would rather take my chances with TK actually playing defense over Drysdale. That’s how bad it’s been.

And no, Buium was a much better and more accomplished prospect than Drysdale entering the draft. Yes he played on a stacked team, but he led the country in TOI as a draft eligible defenseman. They were stacked in large part because of his impacts (especially in the playoffs).

Oh and he scored more per game in college hockey as a defenseman than the player they picked in the first round as a 1C in the OHL. In no way shape or form was that an “easy choice”.

It’s not hard to find articles pre-draft that call Drysdale a #1, elite player based on production and projection.


Thinking otherwise is just revisionist history. Buium has all the same hype now, still pre-NHL, but still somehow taken 6th in his own draft class.

Are NHL GMs infallible? No, absolutely not. But the trend lately is to hype up prospects like crazy before they make the NHL, reaching to the far side of their upside.

Even over talented players only have a small chance to reach that upside, so treating Buium as high likelihood to reach those goals is in itself disingenuous at best. He can; but so can a lot of players at 18-19.
 
  • Like
Reactions: renberg
It’s not hard to find articles pre-draft that call Drysdale a #1, elite player based on production and projection.


Thinking otherwise is just revisionist history. Buium has all the same hype now, still pre-NHL, but still somehow taken 6th in his own draft class.

Are NHL GMs infallible? No, absolutely not. But the trend lately is to hype up prospects like crazy before they make the NHL, reaching to the far side of their upside.

Even over talented players only have a small chance to reach that upside, so treating Buium as high likelihood to reach those goals is in itself disingenuous at best. He can; but so can a lot of players at 18-19.
I'm not looking for articles. I'm going off of what I saw.

The Hockey Writers? Surely you can provide a better source than that. Even so, the same people that were calling him a future #1 then are the same people that were comping him to f***ing Scott Niedermayer post trade (ftr I am pretty conservative with my projections and even I wouldn't call Buium a future #1, decent chance yes, but that's a ridiculously high bar for any prospect not named Dahlin). Prospect opinions are hard to change. There's also a decent chance without the Covid shutdown that Sanderson would have surpassed him by the time the u18s rolled around. He was on that trajectory. That was also a bad defensive class. I only had Sanderson and Drysdale as certain first rounders. That certainly pushed them up the board. This most recent class was relatively strong with defenders, especially at the top.

I watched Drysdale pretty closely his draft year including the entire Hlinka tournament in one sitting and while he was good, he always left me wanting more. Saw him play as an underager in the u18s, and came away much more impressed with Thomas Harley who was not much older (Bo Byrum the year before was much more impressive as an underager). The skating, while less impressive now, was always the standout trait and gave him a much bigger edge at that level than he has at this level. Drysdale was never a great defensive player but the hope was his feet would allow him to at least be a decent rush defender and transition guy and that hasn't happened. And when that doesn't happen you better be one heck of an offensive talent, and I never thought he had gamebreaking skill.

Production? It's not really that close. Drysdale's production was good but nothing special, which is part of the reason I wasn't too bullish on him. He was a great puck rusher, but he didn't create as much as you would expect at the OHL level given his tools. A lot of dead-end plays. And he didn't have to fight for much opportunity on that Erie team.

Here's their NHLe by Bader's model.

1729882718322.png


1729882766287.png




There is way too much made out of where he went in the draft as proof he wasn't a good prospect? How many times do we need to see smaller defensemen drop in the draft and excel post draft before we stop appealing to authority? Look at how many defensemen under 6 foot were taken in this most recent draft (Hint: you can count on one hand). It's really not hard to see how a league of size queens let him fall.
 
You don't need a true #1 if you have two pairs that can hold their own in any situation and play big minutes. See Florida.

Whoa. I know some people got carried away with Forsling and started arguing he was top 5, but he's easily a top 20 guy who played at the absolute top of his game for that run.

Off the top of my head, he'd probably be top 15 but we know how these lists go. You don't know until you make them. Given that you subscribe to the counting teams style of making these lists, asserting that he's not even top 32 is wild.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad