GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,842
- 44,568
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
If I remember correctly, the question with Gauither was always whether he'd remain at center or have to play LW. What made him a "safe" pick was his floor was probably a 30 goal LW.
I think one reason the Flyers weren't desperate to sign him after his freshman year was he didn't show a lot at center and without a big jump, was going to play LW in the NHL. He definitely needed the 2nd year in college and would probably have sulked if sent to the AHL.
What the hell are those rankingsDidn't a publication rank Gauthier as a better prospect than Michkov earlier this year? f***ing hilarious.
edit: of course it was Button
Cutter Gauthier, Alexander Nikishin lead Craig Button’s top 50 NHL-affiliated prospects list | TSN
Cutter Gauthier was in the midst of some controversy this season, but there's nothing controversial about Craig Button ranking him at No. 1.www.tsn.ca
Pure speculation to push a narrative.If I remember correctly, the question with Gauither was always whether he'd remain at center or have to play LW. What made him a "safe" pick was his floor was probably a 30 goal LW.
I think one reason the Flyers weren't desperate to sign him after his freshman year was he didn't show a lot at center and without a big jump, was going to play LW in the NHL. He definitely needed the 2nd year in college and would probably have sulked if sent to the AHL.
"Feltcher" is going to drink mouthwash runoff from Flahr's ass crack....chocolate mint flavored.Floss is mint flavored, no chance Flahr won't eat it before handing it out.
I don't know why you keep saying his floor is a 30 goal left wing, but I can assure Gauthier's floor is much lower than that.If I remember correctly, the question with Gauither was always whether he'd remain at center or have to play LW. What made him a "safe" pick was his floor was probably a 30 goal LW.
I think one reason the Flyers weren't desperate to sign him after his freshman year was he didn't show a lot at center and without a big jump, was going to play LW in the NHL. He definitely needed the 2nd year in college and would probably have sulked if sent to the AHL.
But, I thought we didn't need a #1D stud like Buium because we have small D like Drysdale, York and Andrae already?Well we know Flyer fans are unlikely to be chanting "Jamie's better". Drysdale will probably be -25 by January.
Well we know Flyer fans are unlikely to be chanting "Jamie's better". Drysdale will probably be -25 by January.
Everyone needs a 1D stud even if they have one but arent we really getting ahead of ourselves with him being that. I live in Denver and have caught a few of his games. He is really good but plays on a team that is materally better than most of their opponents. Additionally he is going to a team that is waay better than anything Drysdale or York have ever played on as pros. Finally given the gigantic organizational whole at center and the KO drama, to me it seems like passing on him was an easy choice.But, I thought we didn't need a #1D stud like Buium because we have small D like Drysdale, York and Andrae already?
Note that ALL of the Flyers are minuses so far, except Deslaurier-Poehling-Hathaway! LOL!
Philadelphia Flyers Club Stats | 2024 - 2025 | Philadelphia Flyers
Kevin Haller...Any chance JD can even be a Steve Duchesne like guy? Ives Racine? Probably Greg Hawgood!!!
Seeing a trend here that previous D men on the Flyers that were mostly serviceable and not needle movers were still better than what Drysdale has shown so far in his short and oft injured career. Even Ryan Parent had a least one good playoff stint with the Flyers until his back forced him to retire...Haller was very solid. Only if JD can become solid.
I think if Dickinson fell, they would have jumped on him.
More of the prototype 1D, and a perfect pairing with Bonk.
He's been playing with Dickinson for two years, I think as a pair they'd be fine, and that would give you 2 solid pairs that could eat the lion's share of defensive minutes. You don't need a true #1 if you have two pairs that can hold their own in any situation and play big minutes. See Florida.Bonk doesn't project as a top pairing defenseman. Every scouting report I've seen had him as a top 4 (one had him as bottom pairing) and that he doesn't have any particular skills that stand out, but was the "safest" defensive pick in the 1st round.
Of course, he can always develop and become a top pairing defenseman over time. But nothing to date says that it is a likely outcome.
that's terrifyingI think if Dickinson fell, they would have jumped on him.
More of the prototype 1D, and a perfect pairing with Bonk.
Luchanko is probably their prototype top 6 center, full sized, elite speed, two way player who can cover for scoring wings with defensive issues. I think next season you'll see Luchanko and Michkov joined at the hip.
Ideally, they land another top six center in the 2025 draft, make Frost the 3C (if they keep him) and move Couts to LW in a couple years.
Copium.
Forget equivalents, I think I would rather take my chances with TK actually playing defense over Drysdale. That’s how bad it’s been.
And no, Buium was a much better and more accomplished prospect than Drysdale entering the draft. Yes he played on a stacked team, but he led the country in TOI as a draft eligible defenseman. They were stacked in large part because of his impacts (especially in the playoffs).
Oh and he scored more per game in college hockey as a defenseman than the player they picked in the first round as a 1C in the OHL. In no way shape or form was that an “easy choice”.
I'm not looking for articles. I'm going off of what I saw.It’s not hard to find articles pre-draft that call Drysdale a #1, elite player based on production and projection.
Jamie Drysdale - 2020 NHL Draft Prospect Profile - The Hockey Writers NHL Entry Draft Latest News, Analysis & More
We profile Erie Otters' defenseman Jamie Drysdale. He is among the best defensemen available in this draft class. How high will he go?thehockeywriters.com
Thinking otherwise is just revisionist history. Buium has all the same hype now, still pre-NHL, but still somehow taken 6th in his own draft class.
Are NHL GMs infallible? No, absolutely not. But the trend lately is to hype up prospects like crazy before they make the NHL, reaching to the far side of their upside.
Even over talented players only have a small chance to reach that upside, so treating Buium as high likelihood to reach those goals is in itself disingenuous at best. He can; but so can a lot of players at 18-19.
You don't need a true #1 if you have two pairs that can hold their own in any situation and play big minutes. See Florida.