GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,836
- 44,566
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
I remember they weren't sure he could play center, one reason they wanted him to stay in college was to play center b/c he had a so-so freshman season.Maybe not retrospectively discuss this but some reasonable remembering might be useful. He was/is/will not be a 1C in the NHL. The skills for that position aren’t there. That the Flyers thought that they could make this happen was an illustration of the misguided egoism that has permeated the franchise for way too long. Cutter may have done everyone a favor by getting off of the club since he was never going to be capable of filling the role that the club had for him.
The remaining issue is was the return adequate? Right now it looks like a Tippett type player in exchange for a RHD, probably eventually a second pair one, and an early second round DC. Time will tell but it could be a fair exchange. Whether DB could have done better we’ll never know.
I think it was more a matter of his floor being a 30+ goal LW and his ceiling being a 1C/2C.
I doubt that, he'd have to be stone stupid not to make it given his size, speed and shot.I have far, far more of a problem with the former than the latter if this is indeed what they thought. He had a floor of not an NHLer.
I doubt that, he'd have to be stone stupid not to make it given his size, speed and shot.
There are plenty of top six wings in the NHL who are primarily offense first guys who score at ES and on the PP but are sheltered to some extent b/c they're defensive liabilities.
Patrick?A bunch of guys existing is a completely different conversation from a player’s floor. There are a handful of guys in every draft with a floor higher than that.
Patrick?
I remember they weren't sure he could play center, one reason they wanted him to stay in college was to play center b/c he had a so-so freshman season.
I think it was more a matter of his floor being a 30+ goal LW and his ceiling being a 1C/2C.
I see more as a probability distribution, there are tails at either end, then the 1SD range (67%).Exactly what I mean! We talk about these guys with certainty that simply does not exist.
Hasn't shown that yet.I see more as a probability distribution, there are tails at either end, then the 1SD range (67%).
Both tails are unlikely but happen (total flop, surprise Allstar).
So to me the median Gauthier is a 30 goal scorer with subpar defense (b/c he seems to be a more talented but less motivated Tippett).
The median Drysdale is a solid 3RHD who is a PP1 QB.
I see more as a probability distribution, there are tails at either end, then the 1SD range (67%).
Both tails are unlikely but happen (total flop, surprise Allstar).
So to me the median Gauthier is a 30 goal scorer with subpar defense (b/c he seems to be a more talented but less motivated Tippett).
The median Drysdale is a solid 3RHD who is a PP1 QB.
I see both tails as low probability events, because you can't plan on hitting the lottery or a tornado taking your house.I think we just define floor differently, which is completely fine. It could be 1st through 20th Percentile outcomes or even higher depending on the person and the player involved. None of them are wrong. They're different discussions.
JVR?I've brought this up several times, but the Flyers have a total organizational block on trading ELC players. Not even talking prospects still in junior. Play a game if you want: find me the last one, then find me the one before.
Sbisa and....? Sbisa also wasn't necessarily a judgment call
We can litigate how the Flyers aren't good at aspects of drafting, but it doesn't take much to prove how high their opinion is of themselves. I don't think they ever steel man an argument about any of their prospects, which leads to thoughts of selling high. All while oddly not pumping their prospects' values. I think they don't care about pumping value because they assume they'll eventually hit within the organization.
i feel like we had this sort of guy on our team beforeI see more as a probability distribution, there are tails at either end, then the 1SD range (67%).
Both tails are unlikely but happen (total flop, surprise Allstar).
So to me the median Gauthier is a 30 goal scorer with subpar defense (b/c he seems to be a more talented but less motivated Tippett).
The median Drysdale is a solid 3RHD who is a PP1 QB.
JVR?
How often do top prospects get traded on their ELC?
5 game sample and I'm not sure we know when this data stabilizes, but his top end speed dipped again. Not great.
Fun fact, Sanheim is the only defenseman on the team considered to have "above average" speed.
While Drysdale is the poster child for Planned Parenthood right now ...talk of Cutter being sent down provides some solace. If he does get sent down his name should be "Cut-him" Gauthier...not Cutter
If they traded Gauthier as rumored for Rossi, then drafted Buium, the future would be very much brighter.Even if Gauthier never pans out, the could have traded him for a much more useful asset than Drysdale. Just poor asset management like always.
They just had to let bumbling Bob Murray get into their ear about Drysdale. If there was ever a GM to not trust about young defensemen evaluation it should have him been him. He traded Theodore to Vegas in the expansion draft then traded Montour to Buffalo.
yea well sometimes life doesnt work out that way. it's not like it's his JOB to care about maximizing the talent of the franchise and ensuring they have the best possible chance of winning the cup so they can sell out WFC every night.If they traded Gauthier as rumored for Rossi, then drafted Buium, the future would be very much brighter.
They'd have a 1C, 1D and 1G base, even if Rossi is small. They could have flipped TK for a mid 1st+ and still gotten Luchanko if they loved him.
Suddenly, you have tons of cap space, tons of picks, key positions covered (1C, 2C, 1D, 2D (York), 1G) all in system and just wait until they develop.