TopC0rner
Registered User
- Feb 21, 2018
- 723
- 683
The crown doesn't have to prove that everything was non consensual. They have to "prove" that something was. Plus, in sexual assault cases, a credible testimony is enough proof. That said, can the jury be swayed even if the testimony is credible? That's a tough question. Wealthy abusers get away frequently from good cases and a pliable jury.I think there is a lot of public pressure to see this go to trial. But as you’ve eluded to, it’s not an Open and shut case and I haven’t read all the details but the crown will have to prove a heavy burden that everything was non consensual. It’s a he-said/she-said. Regardless the victim did not deserve to have what happened to her, happen to her. I really feel for the victim, she will have to relive this through the trial and it won’t be easy with the public eyes all over this.