Amazinmets73
Registered User
- Dec 1, 2015
- 1,014
- 483
Less than 5%. Who wants to take a player with repeated covid violations while the virus rampages through the country?Odds he plays a game for another team this season?
Less than 5%. Who wants to take a player with repeated covid violations while the virus rampages through the country?Odds he plays a game for another team this season?
That’s not how a termination works. It’s not a buyout. Kane gets zero real dollars from SJ going forward and his entire cap hit is gone.
Then Toronto would be perfectHis name on the Stanley Cup would
Make me throw up.
Obviously it wasn’t something that was guaranteed to happen, but based off his history, it had to have been something they were aware of as a possibility.You have a point on the buyout option depressing the value of assets that would have gone the other way, but your implication that the team could have reasonably assumed that there would have been an opportunity like this to terminate his contract and ought to have made decisions on this basis doesn't make sense, and I think you probably realize this and are pretending you don't in order to stunt on people who said things that bothered you.
SJ is just saying they aren't going to honor the contract and not pay him. That doesn't mean what they are doing is legal. It is most likely not.That’s not how a termination works. It’s not a buyout. Kane gets zero real dollars from SJ going forward and his entire cap hit is gone.
$10 American. That's a downpayment on a house up here.You must be very confident of that happening to wager so much money.
Okay, but that isn't really what you were implying in the first place, which was that people who believed San Jose would have to retain and throw in assets to move his contract ought to have been aware something like this would happen, not that it could.Obviously it wasn’t something that was guaranteed to happen, but based off his history, it had to have been something they were aware of as a possibility.
We will get there now we need a second verse.
go ahead swarm intelligence of this board.
If he will sign for cheap, then yes.Welcome to Toronto Kane
Mad probs.There's no more touchdowns,
No Serbians, only Czechs,
There's no more wristshots,
And nobody's getting checks.
Please don't come to Pittsburgh. In fact, don't even fly over Pittsburgh on your way to Toronto.
The card drops deep as does my arm.There's no more touchdowns,
No Serbians, only Czechs,
There's no more wristshots,
And nobody's getting checks.
that was a settlement not a full blown termination
In terms of a griveance, I imagine that Kane gets back a good chunk of the money he will lose due to the contract termination, but the Sharks won't be on the hook for any of his cap. I think something similar happened with Simon Despres and Mike Richards.
I hate how people perpetuate propaganda like this. The issues with Kane is that he submitted a fake vaccination certificate, along with all his personal issues with his wife and child that have been made public. Almost zero chance SJ gets out of the contract, even if they do, they still owe him the money. Also you don't have to be vaccinated to play in the NHL. Tyler Bertuzzi is not vaccinated.