Sure let’s compare the foundations head to head.
When was this iteration of the Sens foundation created? 2021.
When was the flames foundation created? 1980.
Home - Calgary Flames Foundation
I wonder if people have more confidence donating to a charity that has been around for 40 years or a charity created less than six months ago?
On that topic, how much has the charity invested in the community? It seems the flames foundation has given over 50,000,000$.
Home - Calgary Flames Foundation
How much has this iteration of the Sens community foundation donated? You estimated about 100k from the 50/50 but the truth is we don’t know.
I wonder if having first hand knowledge of a charity’s impact affects how much people are willing to give?
Has the flames foundation ever broken its ties to the flames to continue charitable work as a split off? No. The Sens? Yes.
I wonder if that could have an impact of the confidence of people donating?
How many 50/50 draws did each team have anyway? We should probably check to make sure we’re comparing apples to apples.
Seems the flames foundation held over 56 draws this season.
https://cflames.bump5050.com/winners
The Sens community foundation seems to have only held 16.
50/50 Raffle
I wonder if having 3.5 times as many draws, and consistently holding them every game could have an impact on how many people donate and on how much they donate?
What else could the foundations do to attract fan interest? I guess partnerships with alumni might help. Let’s see how those compare.
We know Phillips just walked out the door and we don’t know whether Neil was involved in the foundation. I can’t find an indication that the Sens Alumni aside from Phillips contributed to the new Ottawa senators community foundation.
On the flames foundation side it seems dozen of former players are involved in the alumni association and that they make significant contributions to the flames foundation’s efforts to raise money.
OVER $400,000 RAISED AT FLAMES CHARITY GOLF CLASSIC
It’s also interesting to note that despite the team being only 12 years older than the Sens, the flames alumni association has more than three times the members of the Sens association.
http://calgaryflamesalumni.com
Alumni Roster
I wonder why the Sens alumni association has such low membership figures?
We can also compare how much time and effort the flames’ foundation invests in communicating its programs, let’s look at this page
United by Community featuring dozens of charities supported by the flames foundation and dozens of videos featuring current and former players contributing to the efforts.
How does that compare to the Sens’ community foundation site? They talk about “three pillars” that supposedly guide their donation practices but there aren’t any actual charities listed.
How We Give | Senators Community Foundation
I wonder if transparency might have an impact on donations?
On that front, I wonder how successful each foundation has been at making links and partnerships with their respective communities?
It seems the flames foundation has several initiatives where they have partnered with other organizations in creative ways to give back to the community, for instance partnering with Parks Foundation Calgary for the support for sports program
Support For Sport - Calgary Flames Foundation or partnering with the Sheldon Kennedy Child Advocacy Center
FLAMES FOUNDATION, SKCAC PARTNER ON PROGRAM or recently partnering with Kidsport Calgary
FLAMES FOUNDATION JOINES KIDSPORT IN DELIVERING BACK TO SPORT PLAY PACKS - Calgary Flames Foundation.
Can’t find any information about partnerships with the Sens community foundation. I wonder why that would be?
Looking at all these questions, I can’t help but wonder if
maybe there’s more to this dilemma than Sens fans being cheap?
TLDR: it’s not as simple as saying ottawa fans are cheap.
You don’t know the bolded, you have no idea what the Ottawa senators community foundation’s expenses were. For all you know there was a private blow out between Weir and someone else which led to his dismissal. It’s odd that you’re so firmly against Mendes drawing logical conclusions about Phillips being alienated while choosing to ignore foundational flaws in your own analysis like basing your entire hypothesis on estimates of revenues loosely based on 50/50 draws winnings without having even an estimated idea of expenses.