Lucic + Pastrnak vs J. Hughes + Clarkson

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Which teams combo you taking?


  • Total voters
    82
Status
Not open for further replies.

Coffee

The name of the game is light works
Sponsor
Nov 12, 2021
10,313
9,293
Let’s imagine both Lucic and Clarkson are 25 years old



:bruins

David Pastrnak
Milan Lucic


OR

:devils

Jack Hughes
David Clarkson





Which combo do you take on your team right now ?
 
If Lucic is 25 I have what, 2 years at the most before he starts sucking? Clarkson maybe 3?

So it’s kind of a wash there no?

Give me Jack Hughes over Pastrnak.
 
Surely, I can’t be faulted for choosing the center. Hughes is younger and on a better contract.

It depends on who your team is I think, that why I thought it would be an interesting poll

For the sens the positions and styles make the Boston pair a bit more interesting IMO

Tkachuk-Stutzle-Pastrnak
Lucic-Norris-Batherson
Greig-Pinto-Giroux

Tkachuk-Hughes-Giroux
Norris-Stutzle-Batherson
Greig-Pinto-Clarkson
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
BOS.

As good as Hughes is, why would I want a guy who had one good season in his career, couldn't skate and effectively stopped being an NHL calibre player soon after turning 25? To have to buy him out or lose an asset/assets to move the contract?

Sure, Lucic's best years were behind him by age 25, but at least he had more than one good season and continued to be an NHL calibre forward for a number of years after turning 25.
 
Am I missing something? 25 year old Pastrnak scored 113 points and 61 goals. 25 year old Lucic was scoring 60 pts while being among the most physical and menacing players in the NHL. David Clarkson scored 46 points once and also had his ass beat by Lucic. This isn't even remotely close.
 
Am I missing something? 25 year old Pastrnak scored 113 points and 61 goals. 25 year old Lucic was scoring 60 pts while being among the most physical and menacing players in the NHL. David Clarkson scored 46 points once and also had his ass beat by Lucic. This isn't even remotely close.
Yes your missing Hughes however your still right this isn't close. Both Bruins are the better players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
I hate Lucic and wouldn't want him on my team. Also, I think pretty highly of Hughes and could see him surpass Pastrnak (though it's not a given), so I picked Hughes's duo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee
If Lucic is 25 I have what, 2 years at the most before he starts sucking? Clarkson maybe 3?

So it’s kind of a wash there no?

Give me Jack Hughes over Pastrnak.
Jack Hughes has been looking super soft at 4 Nations so far…but maybe Pastrnak would as well
 
Not close I see you don't watch Hughes or know who Burrows is. It's fine to pick either and I'm taking Hughes Burrows but it's definitely close.
I watch plenty. It’s like nobody here recognizes 25 year old pasta was a top 3-4 player in the NHL and 25 year old lucic was an absolute battering ram. He was twice as strong and mean as Burrows. Seems more like few people here watched those 2010s era bruins
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad