Traded Erik Brännström - D - Part III

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,544
10,746
I still like the guy.

Not as an every day defenceman, but man his skating is so lovely.
It is pretty to watch although it would be nice if he skated to the proper spot occasionally
 

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,370
7,846
Looking good so far in a physical game

I think we can all agree that chabot Zub Holden and brannstrom are the best defensemen on this team and are NHL calibre
 
  • Like
Reactions: NB613

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,544
10,746
Looking good so far in a physical game

I think we can all agree that chabot Zub Holden and brannstrom are the best defensemen on this team and are NHL calibre
Agreed. I much prefer Brannstrom on the left side.
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,544
10,746
Brannstrom just needs to continue to progress and the decisions after next year will become very difficult, which is a good thing
 
  • Like
Reactions: NB613 and HSF

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,544
10,746
Hes going to start attracting attention from other teams -
Based on what ? He’s progressing and is one of our 4-5 best D but our D is shit. Where would he fit on a better team. Not disparaging him just curious.
 

Sweatred

Erase me
Jan 28, 2019
13,408
3,326
im sure a lot of teams are already trying to take him from Dorion

I hope so - but probably trying to steal him … if he keeps getting better someone will pay.

I like Branny - but unless DJ will let him run PP1 I don’t think we need him. Sandy/Lassi can run PP2 and everyone else is a better defender.
 

Sweatred

Erase me
Jan 28, 2019
13,408
3,326
Based on what ? He’s progressing and is one of our 4-5 best D but our D is shit. Where would he fit on a better team. Not disparaging him just curious.

He needs to develop to the point he is a PP1 candidate for a team to pay for him. I don’t know the league well enough to know how many teams would view him as an upgrade to PP1 … but it only needs to be 2-5…

Off the top …
1. Seattle
2. MTL
3. ? LA ?
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,544
10,746
He needs to develop to the point he is a PP1 candidate for a team to pay for him. I don’t know the league well enough to know how many teams would view him as an upgrade to PP1 … but it only needs to be 2-5…

Off the top …
1. Seattle
2. MTL
3. ? LA ?
I think he’s more valuable to us than we would get in a trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NB613

Sweatred

Erase me
Jan 28, 2019
13,408
3,326
I think he’s more valuable to us than we would get in a trade.

i like him too - I just don’t see a pure PK body in this group - maybe it’s a brown type player or Sanderson … but we have 3-6 D that project as light puck movers.
 

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,370
7,846
Based on what ? He’s progressing and is one of our 4-5 best D but our D is shit. Where would he fit on a better team. Not disparaging him just curious.

I mean why aren't we developing him further? He seems to have serious potential to be a top 4 puck moving defensemen.
 

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,370
7,846
i like him too - I just don’t see a pure PK body in this group - maybe it’s a brown type player or Sanderson … but we have 3-6 D that project as light puck movers.
Brannstrom and Chabot can move the puck and Sanderson

No one else is really that good at it. Thomson and Zub are okay but they probably aren't going to be the go to guys for transitioning the puck
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,544
10,746
I mean why aren't we developing him further? He seems to have serious potential to be a top 4 puck moving defensemen.
Because he’s now an NHL player. If you want to really focus on developing players without worrying about results you keep them in the AHL and put them in those positions.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad