Epic Calder Battle in 2024-25 Season

Brookbank

Registered User
Nov 15, 2022
2,336
2,181
So it turns out that Mitchkovs KHL contract was just ploy to scare off teams so that he could fall to Philly.

Any team above Philly could have picked him anyway and then traded him
 

Roksta

Registered User
Jul 27, 2011
1,118
1,599
Lane Hutson? Bwahaha

I mean I guess its possible, offensive D gets career year in points on shit teams (see Mike Matheson last year)
 

HanSolo

DJ Crazy Times
Apr 7, 2008
99,242
35,458
Las Vegas
No, because he was meh. Did he do anything special? He was okay.
He showed a lot of creativity, skill and confidence in the third period. For his first official NHL game I thought he was good. Wouldn't say great or outstanding but meh is not the right word
 

D Wakaluk

Registered User
Dec 8, 2010
1,889
3,396
stuck in the '90s
San Jose and Montreal just wont score as much as Dallas. It's a fact.

Stanky playing with Hintz & Roberts can't hurt either. He'll get some healthy peepee minutes aswell.

It's over.
 

Zalos

Berktwad
Feb 2, 2009
2,119
1,642
Quebec
If Faber wasn't even considered neither is Hutson.
Faber had low 40s points and finished 2nd in voting. If Hutson pulls out 50-60 points as a rookie defenseman on a lottery team, he for sure is going to be up there.

Still, I'm expecting one of the forwards to win it.
 

Lunatik

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 12, 2012
57,886
9,934
“Lap the field” lmao. Biased much? I don’t think any rookie ever has done anything close to what you could call “lapping the field” except maybe Gretzky. It certainly won’t be Stankoven, whose upside is likely somewhere between Brendan Gallagher and Alex DeBrincat.
Teemu Selanne had a pretty incredible rookie season, 30 points ahead of 2nd in points, 35 goals ahead of 2nd in goals. Had more ESP than Lindros who was also a rookie had for total points
 

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,577
6,418
Teemu Selanne had a pretty incredible rookie season, 30 points ahead of 2nd in points, 35 goals ahead of 2nd in goals. Had more ESP than Lindros who was also a rookie had for total points
Cool. He still didn’t “lap the field “.
 

Fraser28

Registered User
Jan 13, 2013
2,290
2,282
Lol. Why cause he didn't score?

No because after watching the whole game he looked mediocre relative to the very high expectation. It’s only Game 1 but Celebrini was much more impressive in his debut.

Again, only based on one game. It means very little, but all we have to go off so far. And always kinda fun to evaluate a hyped rookie’s first game.
 

HanSolo

DJ Crazy Times
Apr 7, 2008
99,242
35,458
Las Vegas
No because after watching the whole game he looked mediocre relative to the very high expectation. It’s only Game 1 but Celebrini was much more impressive in his debut.

Again, only based on one game. It means very little, but all we have to go off so far. And always kinda fun to evaluate a hyped rookie’s first game.
To each their own. Thought he had a fair share of moments that demonstrate he has higher innate skill, creativity, vision and decisiveness compared to his teammates. Yeah it you're comparing to another rookie who had a lucky goal and an assist, sure. Relative disappointment.
 

Fraser28

Registered User
Jan 13, 2013
2,290
2,282
To each their own. Thought he had a fair share of moments that demonstrate he has higher innate skill, creativity, vision and decisiveness compared to his teammates. Yeah it you're comparing to another rookie who had a lucky goal and an assist, sure. Relative disappointment.

“Lucky goal and an assist” is a reductive way to sell Celebrini short. I’m figuring you didn’t watch the game? His assist was beautiful, the move leading to the lucky bounce goal was impressive, he was buzzing most of the night, and looked amazing QB’ing the power play.

Sadly, Celebrini is injured and on IR. Injuries are so annoying!
 
Last edited:

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,272
21,130
Vegass
To each their own. Thought he had a fair share of moments that demonstrate he has higher innate skill, creativity, vision and decisiveness compared to his teammates. Yeah it you're comparing to another rookie who had a lucky goal and an assist, sure. Relative disappointment.
I like that Michkov showed skill and creativity with no points, but Celebrini's skill and creativity was "a lucky goal and an assist".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fraser28

HanSolo

DJ Crazy Times
Apr 7, 2008
99,242
35,458
Las Vegas
I like that Michkov showed skill and creativity with no points, but Celebrini's skill and creativity was "a lucky goal and an assist".
I didn't say he didn't look impressive. He looked great and clearly lived up to his first overall talent. I said what I said to inartfully make the point that not every high talent prospect is going to have a stellar first game.

The lucky first goal was my own head saying the difference on the scoresheet between the two could've been 1 assist over 0 points but for a lucky bounce.
 
Last edited:

HanSolo

DJ Crazy Times
Apr 7, 2008
99,242
35,458
Las Vegas
“Lucky goal and an assist” is a reductive way to sell Celebrini short. I’m figuring you didn’t watch the game? His assist was beautiful, the move leading to the lucky bounce goal was impressive, he was buzzing most of the night, and looked amazing QB’ing the power play.

Sadly, Celebrini is injured and on IR. Injuries are so annoying!
See my last post. I have a bad habit of trying to make points with illustrative examples instead of just saying what I mean. Celebrini had a great first game. Michkov having a less impactful performance doesn't mean much to me. He had plenty of moments that showed he should be one of the frontrunners in this race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fraser28

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad