Discourse created and attitude? How do you know if that's even the case? You can't make those kinds of assumptions unless your in sitting in the room with both parties. Otherwise, those are just speculations thrown up in the air and have no leg to stand on.
-Making Subban a better person comments
-Not playing Subban big minutes, taking him completely off the PK
-Benching Eller after the first game of the season where everyone looked bad. Saying "there's no time to fool around."
-Making it extremely difficult for Eller to break the top 6 no matter how well he performs. No PP time in 2012-2013 despite being the best centre, no offensive opportunity in the POs despite again being the most offensive centre.
-MB taking credit for Subban's Norris and Olympics. Saying that he was a healthy scratch before he arrived as GM.
-Eller got 0 credit after the season in 2012-2013 in MB's post-season conference, 0 recognition once again this year.
-Freidman reporting that Eller was the first person MB looked into trading when he arrived as GM, but kept him on board because a lot of GMs were interested.
-Subban repeatedly getting singled out when other players have played worse.
-Giving Subban credit begrudgingly.
-Subban's low ball bridge. Holding him out
-This reported low ball towards Eller.
There's plenty to go around. These offers are symptomatic of a weird relationship between Eller, Subban and Management that appeared at the beginning of MB and MT's tenure. White and Briere got similar treatment from MT.