dj Mahoney
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2021
- 1,582
- 843
Lets say it all together ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ready ? One and done ! ,it's all good funThank you, we’ll manage….
Lets say it all together ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ready ? One and done ! ,it's all good funThank you, we’ll manage….
Nhl.com and hockeydb
He plays right wing. Absolute bomb of a shot.Nhl.com and hockeydb
He plays right wing. Absolute bomb of a shot.
The Oilers currently have 3 of 4 RW forwards out. Puljujarvi, Yamamoto and Kassian. And Nuge can't cover because is also out with a UBI.
They're playing a gutsy game right now against Carolina in the 3rd. Maybe this Kubalik thing should be revisited by Holland ASAP.
Too much given his lack of output this year. He's a bit of a reclamation project. If the pick was lower it would make more sense. Or include Fleury somehow if we need to include the 1st. Fleury and Kubalik for 1st, Savoie, ?????.I think he’d fit well on Edmonton. Really good shot and a responsible two-way game. He could definitely be a 30-goal player again especially if he gets a chance to play with McDavid and/or Draisaitl. 1st and Savoie would probably get him IMO.
I think he’d fit well on Edmonton. Really good shot and a responsible two-way game. He could definitely be a 30-goal player again especially if he gets a chance to play with McDavid and/or Draisaitl. 1st and Savoie would probably get him IMO.
In what world is Barrie not a top4D?
Too much given his lack of output this year. He's a bit of a reclamation project. If the pick was lower it would make more sense. Or include Fleury somehow if we need to include the 1st. Fleury and Kubalik for 1st, Savoie, ?????.
I wonder if there’s a way to change the conditions on the conditional 3rd we have from you to make it a guaranteed 2nd. Something like Kubalik for changing those conditions, your 2nd next year, and Savoie. Otherwise, Kubalik for Savoie, your 2nd (conditional- if we get your 2nd this year, it’s next year’s 2nd. Otherwise, it’s this year’s), and maybe like a mid-round pick.
As for the counter proposal, it would depend on the other piece. I think we could get a 1st for just Fleury. Especially if Colorado is interested.
Also, not sure if I can speak for the entire Hawks fanbase, but I like Savoie as a prospect. Some HF Hawks fans want to keep Kubalik, but for me, I’d probably do the above trade.
Would love a first for Fleury but just don’t see it happening.I wonder if there’s a way to change the conditions on the conditional 3rd we have from you to make it a guaranteed 2nd. Something like Kubalik for changing those conditions, your 2nd next year, and Savoie. Otherwise, Kubalik for Savoie, your 2nd (conditional- if we get your 2nd this year, it’s next year’s 2nd. Otherwise, it’s this year’s), and maybe like a mid-round pick.
As for the counter proposal, it would depend on the other piece. I think we could get a 1st for just Fleury. Especially if Colorado is interested.
Also, not sure if I can speak for the entire Hawks fanbase, but I like Savoie as a prospect. Some HF Hawks fans want to keep Kubalik, but for me, I’d probably do the above trade.
Would love a first for Fleury but just don’t see it happening.
Done if that’s the best offer thereWho knows? Washington is sniffing around. Maybe Colorado. Maybe the Oilers. I dunno, that kind of interest can drive up the price for MAF.
How about:
Koskinen (ufa in 29 games)
Turris (ufa in 29 games)
1st 2022 (top 10 protected)
Savoie
for
Kubalik
MAF @ 50% (ufa in 29 games)
I *think* the Oilers can squeeze that in with the amount of contract dollars they have on LTIR
I don't see why Colorado would be interested. Kuemper has played well for them after a rocky start. Washington could cause a bidding war though.I wonder if there’s a way to change the conditions on the conditional 3rd we have from you to make it a guaranteed 2nd. Something like Kubalik for changing those conditions, your 2nd next year, and Savoie. Otherwise, Kubalik for Savoie, your 2nd (conditional- if we get your 2nd this year, it’s next year’s 2nd. Otherwise, it’s this year’s), and maybe like a mid-round pick.
As for the counter proposal, it would depend on the other piece. I think we could get a 1st for just Fleury. Especially if Colorado is interested.
Also, not sure if I can speak for the entire Hawks fanbase, but I like Savoie as a prospect. Some HF Hawks fans want to keep Kubalik, but for me, I’d probably do the above trade.
Barrie is a top 4 D, just one that has to play beside someone who can cover for some errors. The issue with the Oilers blueline is that we have how many guys who should be playing with someone who can cover defensive defeciencies? Barrie, Bouchard, Keith, sometimes Nurse. No team is going to be solid enough defensively with 3 one way offensive defensemen. Which is precisely why Barrie is one guy we want to move. Can't move Keith (GM won't want to trade his veteran prize pickup), can't move Bouchard (nobody trades young players like Bouchard without regretting it). So Barrie is the one.In the same world he isn't a top 4 on the Oilers with out injuries .
Nurse Bouchard
Keith Ceci
Bouchard isn't one either but he is a rookie that bounces up and down the line up . Even when Barrie plays in the top 4 you have to look at Edmonton defence and compare it with contenders D and it doesn't come close . Edmonton D is some of the reason Smith and Koskinen gets lite up "too many grade A+ scoring chances "
Done if that’s the best offer there
He plays right wing. Absolute bomb of a shot.
Pleasure doing business. Let’s fax it in with the dial up motemNice discussion @Mrfenn92 and @TheDachKnight and good offer @TFHockey.
I've rarely seen an agreed deal on these boards.
Pleasure doing business. Let’s fax it in with the dial up motem
Who knows? Washington is sniffing around. Maybe Colorado. Maybe the Oilers. I dunno, that kind of interest can drive up the price for MAF.
How about:
Koskinen (ufa in 29 games)
Turris (ufa in 29 games)
1st 2022 (top 10 protected)
Savoie
for
Kubalik
MAF @ 50% (ufa in 29 games)
I *think* the Oilers can squeeze that in with the amount of contract dollars they have on LTIR
This would be great for Edmonton, but they can't do it without cap going other way... Hefty cap, like Koskinen etc.Too much given his lack of output this year. He's a bit of a reclamation project. If the pick was lower it would make more sense. Or include Fleury somehow if we need to include the 1st. Fleury and Kubalik for 1st, Savoie, ?????.
There's talk new jersey might get MAF then move him to edmonton in return for smith or kosikain...