LeafsLegendAkiBerg
The original great 8
- Oct 12, 2006
- 3,982
- 2,127
The problem with the Kadri hit was not about if it was legal or illegal, it's about whether it was smart or stupid. Marner gets elbowed, Kadri hits Wingels. Does that prevent Marner from getting elbowed again? Does the ref suddenly go "wow, the Kadri hit was awesome, I should start calling those elbowing penalties!"?
There is a moment (if you watch the video) where Kadri had a choice. Wingels is reaching for the puck with one arm and Kadri is approaching. That puck was loose and Kadri could have easily grabbed the loose puck to keep possession in the Bruins zone. In fact, two Bruins were down after sandwiching Marner (one of which was Chara), so grabbing the loose puck could have resulted in a great scoring chance with Chara out of position. But what did Kadri choose?
Kadri could've also retaliated later with a clean hit or an accidentally-on-purpose elbow in a corner battle or something. When Kadri made that charge immediately after Marner got nailed it's pretty much a guaranteed penalty.