It was a shoulder to shoulder hit, not in the numbers, not charging, not into the boards, not high stick, or crosscheck. It was late, but no later than many hits every game that go uncalled. They called nothing on the ice at first, but because of the result, assessed a major, a rule that was implemented, oddly enough, by another, much worse playoff incident with Pavelski where he was lying on the ice, unconscious, with blood pouring out, and the refs assessed a 5 minute major on the ice, which at that time they could not change. Turns out that Vegas wrongly accused, and it changed the game. The idiots in the ESPN booth seem to have forgotten and seem to think that they are calling basketball game;
-Hextall. "Headshot"(when it was anything but).
- Boucher, "shoulder to shoulder, but he was driving upwards". Huh?
- their rules "expert". "Should be a major!"
And on and on with a lynch mob mentality, rather than actually looking at the hit. You can't penalize for the aftermath of a hit. Pavelski was wobbly, yes...because he hit his head on the ice when he fell, not because Dumba hit him on the head.
IMO the hit was late, and should've been a two. I see hits that late many times per game go uncalled. If Pavelski had not fallen, Dumba would not even have been called. Toronto, after multiple looks at the hit, called it right. Deboer agreed.
What was uncalled during the game were two blatant crosschecks in the back by Suter on Kaprizov, the last of which brought him to his knees. There was nothing even close to fair about it, yet the refs chose to look the other way. I guess they, and the league, would rather watch a game without Kaprizov, one of the most exciting players in the league.