Draft and UDFA Thread: Part IV

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I'd push for 2019 for a couple of reasons.

If you're looking for a pick in the teens, you're doing so because you feel there are going to be players you really like in that spot. You might not know exactly who, but if there are 17 players your scouts rate an 80 or higher, and you're picking 15th, you're going to get one of them. So there's no mystery if that's the approach.

The team your trading with is highly likely to make significant improvement with their new acquisition --- that's why they agreed to the trade in the first place. So the odds are not great that a 2020 pick would be in the teens, or in a better slot.

......Unless you trade with Ottawa :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edge
I get all of this, for me it’s more about spacing out the picks.

We have 2 for sure and may have as many as 4. If 2 stays at 2, then yeah by all means take the pick this year.

Do we really need 5 picks in the 1st this year? Even if you package 2 together, 4 is still kind of excessive.

But again if someone super high on your board is sitting there and you’re confident in their ability to become an impact player , then go for it.

Even if we had 5, I’d be shocked if we used more than 3.

However, what I do think you’d see is an attempt to get the second and third pick higher.

But in general, no, an insane amount of picks wouldn’t phase me. I like the odds it gives me of getting the right components.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jas
I remember saying that while Tkachuk is a great prospect, there was going to be hell to pay if this year’s pick turned out to be number one.

Low and behold...

Tkachuk was not going to make them a better team. And they were trading Karlsson which they knew on draft day. I was shocked. I was in the arena in Dallas, and could hear several people go "What? They are keeping it?"
 
jack hughes, no matter what kakko is doing, is the top pick. period.

kid is absolutely head and shoulders better than anyone else on the ice, especially on the other team, any of the other guys- who are even close, are his teammates and those guys are still in the rear view mirror. way back.

hughes is faster, more skilled, wayyyy smarter and by waaaay i mean an enormous gap in terms of iq and hockey sense, and hughes doesnt just do every thing better, he does everything better FASTER.

when you look at jack huges and his skating, it is near perfect. theres him and everyone else in this draft when it comes to blades on ice. the closest next skater ?? alex newhook.

hughes is blinding speed and a pure hockey mind. together. hes a dynamic playmaker who makes everyone he plays with better. the measure of a difference maker is exactly that. he makes other players better.

hes the top guy. no question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeetchisGod
Tkachuk was not going to make them a better team. And they were trading Karlsson which they knew on draft day. I was shocked. I was in the arena in Dallas, and could hear several people go "What? They are keeping it?"

It made no sense and just reeked of incompetence.

Why wouldn’t you want to wash your hands clean or all that turmoil and start anew?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedblue94
Shifting trough names on eliteprospects draft-center page, I'm wondering about these 2 guys:

Justin Bergeron, LD, playing for Huskies in the QMHJL, was born of the last day to be allowed to be drafted in 2018 (he wasn't).
This year he has 57 points in 65 games with average size. Justin Bergeron at eliteprospects.com

Alex Beaucage, RW/LW also playing for Huskies in the QMHJL , a July 2001 birthday, so young side of the draft class.
Good size, 79 points in 68 games this year. Alex Beaucage at eliteprospects.com

Watching CHl from Europe isn't the easiest thing, and I do not know enough hockey to sww what highlights are transferable to NHL and what just
is "junior play".

Anyone have any input on these 2 guys?


Bergeron should get drafted. Smart two-way defenseman and can QB a power play. Very calm under pressure. Sometimes will have a clunker or two (who doesn't?) but his overall passing and decision making are solid. Rangers have enough in the system like him but we all know how they like overagers.

Beaucage isn't very quick but generates a lot of offense because he's good along the wall and an excellent playmaker for a bigger forward. Comes across as a player taking advantage of smaller competition and might struggle keeping up with the pace of the AHL or NHL.

I would draft Bergeron before I took Beaucage.
 
If the Rangers are trading Chris Kreider at the draft or in July when the new league year begins, Jeff Gorton should look into trading Mika Zibanejad.

I look at the Ducks and they are currently 5th. Anaheim has a soon to be 34 year old Ryan Getzlaf as their top center. Ryan Kesler is on his last legs. His hip issues are a major issue. His career might come to an end sooner rather than later. Adam Henrique is a 3rd line center at best. The Ducks have a lot of long term money invested. Bob Murray believes they can be very good next season. They have many young players in their system in San Diego ready to play. Sam Steel. Max Jones. Maxime Comtois made their team this season and was sent back to junior.

Zibanejad has a good solid contract. He fits the Ducks budget. They have a need for a top center.

The Rangers get the Ducks 1st round pick as part of the trade. The Ducks also are owed a 1st round pick from Buffalo for Brandon Montour. It's either the Blues or Sharks 1st rounder.

The pick the Ducks receive will be one of three first-round selections the Sabres had held. The Ducks will get the pick traded to Buffalo by San Jose, unless the first-round pick the Sabres acquired from St. Louis turns out to be 20th or later in the draft. In that case, the Ducks would get the better of the two picks.

Ducks trade Brandon Montour to Sabres for a first-round pick and a prospect

The Ducks have two #1's. They can afford to trade their own first.

The Rangers can select two top young players in this draft. #5 & #6 as of right now. The lottery results could change that. The teams have games left to be played.

The Rangers strip the team down and still have Zibanejad. Where are they going as a team in the next 2-3 years? Nowhere. That's where. Zibanejad has three years left on his contract. Is Gorton re-signing him in 2-3 years from now? His NMC begins this July. The Rangers hands will be tied. Gorton gets another high end impact player for his rebuild. He said the success of the rebuild will be based on good drafting. Those were his words. Not mine. Gorton has traded a roster player for a top pick.

Assuming the Rangers & Ducks don't win the lottery, the Rangers could come away with two of the following players:Zegras, Turcotte, Cozens, Dach, Byram, Boldy, Podkolzin. That would be so bad? No it wouldn't.
 
you keep trading good veteran players and you end up like edmonton or buffalo. say we get lucky and get hughes or kakko. we trade zibanejad after already trading hayes and were running something like hughes/kakko, chytil, strome down the middle next year. thats not a good environment to develop anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband and bl02
If you keep trading your good players "because we're not competing for 2-3 years" then you will never get to "competing in 2-3 years.'
 
  • Like
Reactions: What Door
you keep trading good veteran players and you end up like edmonton or buffalo. say we get lucky and get hughes or kakko. we trade zibanejad after already trading hayes and were running something like hughes/kakko, chytil, strome down the middle next year. thats not a good environment to develop anyone.

Buffalo and Edmonton had plenty of vets. They had the wrong vets but they had them.
 
I'd be curious to see how location on our board determines whether a poster has Hughes first or Kakko second, just as a social exercise.

I think it's possible, if not probable, that North American posters generally favor North American prospects and European posters generally favor European prospects. That makes sense because people gravitate towards what they tend to see with greater frequency.

But I also get the sense that our North American posters are a little more open and receptive to European prospects, than our European posters are receptive to North American prospects.

It could just a perception thing, but I've noticed it for the past couple of years.
 
Broberg strikes me as the kind of guy who could be really high on the Rangers board:

- He's got a big size / skating combo like Kreider, Skjei, K'Andre, or Chytil.
- He already has pro experience like Andersson, Kravtsov, Chytil, or Lundkvist.
- He's a late birthday like Chytil and Lundkvist.

In general he seems to tick a lot of boxes the Rangers go for.

It seems like a lot of people here want Byram, but I would understand the case for Broberg over Byram. Broberg has a much better physical toolset and it seems like he could have more upside than Byram based on that. He hasn't stood out as much during the regular season, but it's a lot tougher to stand out in a pro league than a junior league and Broberg has been just as good, if not better, than Byram on the international stage. I like Byram too and would concede that he's a smarter player with better offensive sense, but it seems to me like Broberg might have higher upside because of his superior physical abilities and I wouldn't be surprised if the Rangers had him ranked above Byram based on their recent draft picks.
 
It seems like a lot of people here want Byram, but I would understand the case for Broberg over Byram. Broberg has a much better physical toolset and it seems like he could have more upside than Byram based on that. He hasn't stood out as much during the regular season, but it's a lot tougher to stand out in a pro league than a junior league and Broberg has been just as good, if not better, than Byram on the international stage. I like Byram too and would concede that he's a smarter player with better offensive sense, but it seems to me like Broberg might have higher upside because of his superior physical abilities and I wouldn't be surprised if the Rangers had him ranked above Byram based on their recent draft picks.
Sorry, but there is no way that Broberg has a higher upside than Byram. Byram's upside is a legit, top pairing defenseman who is looking at Norris contention. That is NOT Broberg. Any GM who would take Broberg ahead of Byram should never work in the NHL again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bluenote13
Reached out to check on Trouba and was told Winnipeg is going to do everything possible to sign him to a long term contract. They will probably have to let Tyler Myers walk but worst case, they will keep Trouba another year. Even with all of their payroll pressure, they see him as an integral piece going forward.

And as for Kreider, I would assume anyone trading for him (Florida, Colorado, Boston ?) will want to get some assurance they can sign him. Perhaps even agree on a contract pre trade. That will raise the price considerably from a straight first.
 
They didnt have many good vets.

The point is, the reason those teams were/are bad is because management poorly managed the team, not because they didn't have veteran players. I'm not for moving Mika, but not having him isn't going to make or break the long term success of this team. Kane and Toews had nobody when they started out there for the most part and I think Chicago fared pretty well.

Edit: There's also the fact that the majority of their first round picks don't have problems developing, it's that these teams couldn't pick a player outside of the first round if their life depended on it.
 
Last edited:
Broberg strikes me as the kind of guy who could be really high on the Rangers board:

- He's got a big size / skating combo like Kreider, Skjei, K'Andre, or Chytil.
- He already has pro experience like Andersson, Kravtsov, Chytil, or Lundkvist.
- He's a late birthday like Chytil and Lundkvist.

In general he seems to tick a lot of boxes the Rangers go for.

It seems like a lot of people here want Byram, but I would understand the case for Broberg over Byram. Broberg has a much better physical toolset and it seems like he could have more upside than Byram based on that. He hasn't stood out as much during the regular season, but it's a lot tougher to stand out in a pro league than a junior league and Broberg has been just as good, if not better, than Byram on the international stage. I like Byram too and would concede that he's a smarter player with better offensive sense, but it seems to me like Broberg might have higher upside because of his superior physical abilities and I wouldn't be surprised if the Rangers had him ranked above Byram based on their recent draft picks.

Broberg over Byram and we riot
 
Sorry, but there is no way that Broberg has a higher upside than Byram. Byram's upside is a legit, top pairing defenseman who is looking at Norris contention. That is NOT Broberg. Any GM who would take Broberg ahead of Byram should never work in the NHL again.

What is your rationale for thinking that though?

Do you disagree that Broberg was just as good as Byram at the Hlinka? If so, why? Do you not agree that Broberg is a bigger, better skater and that has some correlation with upside?

They were pretty close in McKenzie's scouting poll, so it seems like NHL scouts actually do think it's pretty close.

I like Byram too and, as I said before, I think he has better hockey sense, but I also think Broberg has more physical ability and I don't think it's nearly as clear cut as you're making it out to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad