Dijock94
Registered User
- Apr 1, 2016
- 1,465
- 1,037
He screams good and solid.
But he doesn't necessarily scream dynamic or star.
In other words, he sounds like the type of pick this board has been wary of taking in 2018 and 2019.
Lias
He screams good and solid.
But he doesn't necessarily scream dynamic or star.
In other words, he sounds like the type of pick this board has been wary of taking in 2018 and 2019.
Lias
Lias
Heinola isn’t on Heiskanen’s level and I doubt he’ll end up close to Heiskanen. At the time of their respective drafts, Heinola is a better prospect than Jokiharju and Vaakanainen but Jokiharju has taken massive steps forwardWould you guys be happy with Heinola with a late first? I think he’s underrated. I haven’t seen him often, but his stats look very good, and many Finnish posters are very high on him. They’ve compared him to Heiskanen, and said he’s better than Jokijarju and Vaakanainen.
Heinola isn’t on Heiskanen’s level and I doubt he’ll end up close to Heiskanen. At the time of their respective drafts, Heinola is a better prospect than Jokiharju and Vaakanainen but Jokiharju has taken massive steps forward
To be honest, Heinola impresses me more than Reunanen (who’s having a great year) whenever I view Lukko. He’s better defensively than Reunanen right now. Though Heinola’s size is a concern, he has no problems defending against men and makes smart plays in the D zone. Very few mistakes. Has a great shot as well. Currently I have Heinola at 21 though he’ll probably rise more for me.
I don’t think we’re drafting a LHD in the first round though, Byram included
I didn’t really mean on the same level as Heiskanen, although I worded it poorly. More of a playing style comparison. I’ve only seen him play once not including the WJC, so I don’t know if this is accurate.Heinola isn’t on Heiskanen’s level and I doubt he’ll end up close to Heiskanen. At the time of their respective drafts, Heinola is a better prospect than Jokiharju and Vaakanainen but Jokiharju has taken massive steps forward
To be honest, Heinola impresses me more than Reunanen (who’s having a great year) whenever I view Lukko. He’s better defensively than Reunanen right now. Though Heinola’s size is a concern, he has no problems defending against men and makes smart plays in the D zone. Very few mistakes. Has a great shot as well. Currently I have Heinola at 21 though he’ll probably rise more for me.
I don’t think we’re drafting a LHD in the first round though, Byram included
Ehhh they’re not really similar playstyle wise either, Heinola has to work on his skating/speed first. He’s not a bad skater, but for his size it needs to be a bit more dynamic. Whereas Heiskanen is among the best. Heinola prefers to shoot more as well and usually passes it out of the zone, Heiskanen liked to skate more with the puckI didn’t really mean on the same level as Heiskanen, although I worded it poorly. More of a playing style comparison. I’ve only seen him play once not including the WJC, so I don’t know if this is accurate.
So who is your Farabee this year?
Would you guys be happy with Heinola with a late first? I think he’s underrated. I haven’t seen him often, but his stats look very good, and many Finnish posters are very high on him. They’ve compared him to Heiskanen, and said he’s better than Jokijarju and Vaakanainen.
Is it known where he’s playing next year?
Well, we’ve talked about going for homeruns. We’ve talked about the fact that big swings can also lead to more strikeouts.
So with that in mind, I’d expect that most people will probably want to continue that trend in 2019.
Brinks a beast I'm just praying he somehow falls to our second first
https://thehockeywriters.com/2019-nhl-draft-rankings-march/
If anyone wants to start getting acclimated to some names that'll be available on draft day!!
It’s funny. I like Broberg, but not quite as much as some. I’ve never had him in my top 5, or top 10 for that matter.
When we talk about guys going in the top 10 who we aren’t really talking about on here, he’s fairly high on the list.
I can’t put my finger on it, but there’s something about Krebs I don’t like