But he can learn the other part with time. Not as easy to learn what he already has.
He’s pretty young still for a coach, I bet he rounds out his skills and gets another HC job.
Probably coach a team we play against in the playoffs and beat us, cause we probably aren’t done paying for whatever crime we have obviously committed against the hockey gods….
Pro side argument:
he was given a very bad team to work with. And a GM that made mistakes. Any attempt at bringing in quality veterans backfired miserably. And no one to stop the puck in his time here.
Anti side argument:
The same mistakes appeared to repeat themselves. There appeared to be little structure in play. I know we over use the words: structure and system.. By they are apt. It seemed like they played shinny.
In the end, we are left with no definitive conclusion on him. We will only know when/if he resurfaces somewhere.
Cameron, Maclean, Clouston, Hartsburg, Paddock... never re-surfaced
Crawford.. never resurfaced, but he had a long history in the league, You wonder if he ran his course.
Boucher may have ran his course as well. Although significant TO success could get him another shot.
It will be interesting to see.