Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,616
- 8,857
Interesting
Agreed from SJ side. Timo isn’t helping our tank, so the faster he is off the team for a fair package the better. I don’t mind Holtz, #1 and another prospect or a 2nd rounder
Do you mean around the league or around these parts?
I think Dougie gets his flowers from many on here, he certainly isn't getting any recognition league wide at all though. Which is pretty wild because I remember many talking about him in league circles before coming to NJ and somehow he is flying under the radar while having set a new career high in points with 30 games to go and seems pretty likely to hit 20 goals.
Some here seem to be more focused on his defensive miscues but what the guy brings on offense is worth every penny of the contract we gave him.
I also think him and Siegs have gotten a lot of flak recently. They're a solid pairing as a whole that complement each other pretty nicely.
What he's done in this latest stretch is nothing short of remarkable. He's got 13 points in his past 6 games, 5 of them goals, 3 of them game winners and averaging 24 minutes a night. He's been the 2nd most valuable skater to Jack for the past month or so.
I don’t think the return will matter as much to the players as what else they do. If they just trade him then that probably doesn’t look to good to the players.I think the return on Severson has to be too good to say no to in order to trade him but I think you need to do your due diligence and find out what teams are offering.
The players know it’s a business, if you trade Severson without getting a haul then I think they’ll be annoyed. If you do get a haul then I think they’ll be bummed but understand.
Meier can do math as well as Bratt can. The total comp can be better over 8 year re-sign.
Trading Bratt for Meier would be absurd because it would literally get us nowhere. Apple to Apple and pay dearly to do it? No thanks.
Meier is worth our 1st. And an A prospect and a B prospect and a bottom six roster player perhaps. But these requests for Bratt, Nemec, etc. are a bit absurd.
Interesting
But couldnt we use Luke or Simon in his spot?I don’t believe Severson will be traded. We can’t afford to lose him.
I mean 20:30 a game and 4th most on the team isn’t 3rd pairing minutes at all.Yea, I can tell Sevs can't stand playing 3rd pairing minutes
create cap space + parlay those assets for a Meier trade. I kind of doubt that would happen but you never know if they're all-in to the future, it is a way to protect it while also getting Meier this year.Considering they didn’t bring Nemec up after the WJC’s when Marino was hurt for a test run, I doubt they move Severson. Unless it is a cap move where they are getting a cheaper d man back in return.
I think they’re very comfortable with Smith and aren’t looking to take him out of the lineup. I don’t think Fitz owes this to the boys if he can bring in a big time player like Meier and Hughes can replace Severson reasonably well. In that case it really doesn’t send a poor message. We are just starting our contending window and being smart with assets to ensure the window is as long as possible isn’t a bad idea. There’s a middle ground but as I said I don’t see how players and fans can be too upset with Fitz trading Severson to recoup some assets if he’s also able to bring a player like Meier in and Luke Hughes is stepping into Severson’s spot.Very unusual for a contending team to dump a key player. I understand Luke Hughes will be here but I’d much rather play Luke and Severson…AND NO BRENDAN SMITH!!
I tend to hate letting a player walk and getting nothing in return but I believe Fitz owes it to the boys to field the best team possible for a playoff run. Just think it sends a really poor message. We are in contending mode now, not rebuilding….manage the set of circumstances accordingly.