Setec Astronomy
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2012
- 2,626
- 1,786
Hope for a first round exit from Calgary and trade our first for Matthew Tkachuk.
Ya, that is the question, and Toronto, a team that has never won a playoff round, might not be the best example for building a top heavy team.And so here is the question for the people advocating for dealing an ELC or top 6 pick for Fiala - is that enough to build a true cup contender? I don’t believe so but at least this a more realistic take than “don’t worry about the cap”.
I don’t think it’s a don’t worry about the cap. More of a we can probably afford it if his contract isn’t too big and he’s a really good player, who would make our offense much better and come in to next season as our best offensive forward. Would give us a great LW punch with Bratt alongside our top Center punch.And so here is the question for the people advocating for dealing an ELC or top 6 pick for Fiala - is that enough to build a true cup contender? I don’t believe so but at least this a more realistic take than “don’t worry about the cap”.
Definitely opening yourself up for some criticism ahead. They’re also one of the best teams in the league and while they take a lot of flack 90% of fans would absolutely love to have a team like Toronto has and core group as top heavy as they are.Ya, that is the question, and Toronto, a team that has never won a playoff round, might not be the best example for building a top heavy team.
(Potentially opening myself for some criticism looking ahead).
I don’t think it’s a don’t worry about the cap. More of a we can probably afford it if his contract isn’t too big and he’s a really good player, who would make our offense much better and come in to next season as our best offensive forward. Would give us a great LW punch with Bratt alongside our top Center punch.
Imagine this:
Fiala Hughes
Bratt Hischier
Makes me salivate. And we probably can afford it if the price is reasonable.
Ya Triumph does not account for defense at all. What does Sev's or his replacement cost? What about Graves? Are we letting him walk and going Sieg's, Hughes, OK/Bahl? Sounds dangerous.That’s great, those would be awesome lines. But as Triumph laid out - A deal for Fiala is likely your last big swing of the stick. Look at the team he is joining, and tell me do you see a Stanley Cup contender?
Possibly, but also possible they remain a posterchild for not icing a salary cap top heavy lineup.Definitely opening yourself up for some criticism ahead. They’re also one of the best teams in the league and while they take a lot of flack 90% of fans would absolutely love to have a team like Toronto has and core group as top heavy as they are.
Well they need to add more than him and still could. They probably can’t afford to spend 8 million on a forward in free agency but they would still be able to figure out the goalie situation which is the most important thing. And the resign Severson. I think after figuring out the goaltending, signing a really good winger is the second best thing we could do to improve this team.That’s great, those would be awesome lines. But as Triumph laid out - A deal for Fiala is likely your last big swing of the stick. Look at the team he is joining, and tell me do you see a Stanley Cup contender?
That’s great, those would be awesome lines. But as Triumph laid out - A deal for Fiala is likely your last big swing of the stick. Look at the team he is joining, and tell me do you see a Stanley Cup contender?
At this point I definitely think we’re letting Graves walk or even trading him before he gets there. I’m confident that we can be confident going into the 2023-24 season at LD with Siegenthaler, Hughes, Okhotiuk, Bahl, And Mukhammadullin. We’re more likely to have a surplus at LD than a big problem in a year or two from now. Even if 1 or 2 of those guys tank. Bahl already looked solid and Okhotiuk who I really like started well. They could outplay Graves next year. And then we have Hughes (who we hope can play a big role in year 1) and Mukhammadullin.Ya Triumph does not account for defense at all. What does Sev's or his replacement cost? What about Graves? Are we letting him walk and going Sieg's, Hughes, OK/Bahl? Sounds dangerous.
Or goaltending, which is something I wouldn't mind fixing.
Possibly, but also possible they remain a posterchild for not icing a salary cap top heavy lineup.
Ya Triumph does not account for defense at all. What does Sev's or his replacement cost? What about Graves? Are we letting him walk and going Sieg's, Hughes, OK/Bahl? Sounds dangerous.
Or goaltending, which is something I wouldn't mind fixing.
Possibly, but also possible they remain a posterchild for not icing a salary cap top heavy lineup.
Well they need to add more than him and still could. They probably can’t afford to spend 8 million on a forward in free agency but they would still be able to figure out the goalie situation which is the most important thing. And the resign Severson. I think after figuring out the goaltending, signing a really good winger is the second best thing we could do to improve this team.
If we trade for Fiala then I think we may have all the true impact players necessary. There’s obviously gonna be depth stuff and filling guys in but I don’t think we’re gonna need to pay any big money to bring somebody else in any time soon. I think the time is now or soon for this type of move and I think this type of move may be necessary. We have the high-end forwards necessary with lots of young players pushing to make the NHL roster and more coming.Right, but as he explained (goalie excluded) Fiala is basically the last player you can really afford to spend on. At the current cap if you are paying around $40mil for 5 players (Dougie, Jack, Nico, Bratt, Fiala) that leaves you with an average of $2.5 mil per player to fill out your roster. Even if the cap were to rapidly expand to 90m that still only 3.25, and a rapidly expanding cap will also rapidly increase players salary.
You simply will not have a lot of room to add salary if you make the move for Fiala now, and your best chance at finding the cheap and good players are the same assets you are giving up to acquire him. So that is why I ask - do you see a true cup competitor if we add Fiala (and assume we get a reasonable goaltending fix) and no other impact players?
If we trade for Fiala then I think we may have all the true impact players necessary. There’s obviously gonna be depth stuff and filling guys in but I don’t think we’re gonna need to pay any big money to bring somebody else in any time soon. I think the time is now or soon for this type of move and I think this type of move may be necessary. We have the high-end forwards necessary with lots of young players pushing to make the NHL roster and more coming.
We have what should be a really good d-core with Hamilton, Hughes, Severson, Siegenthaler, as well as Bahl, Okhotiuk, and Mukhammadullin.
So, we realistically shouldn’t be paying more or at least much kore than 3 million for a 3rd pair dman or a bottom 6 forward and that is all I think we’ll still have to figure out. It will just be extensions to me some guys which I think we will still be able to afford. It isn’t necessarily gonna be easy but I don’t this would be putting into that tough of a spot where we can’t make moves going forward.
Probably just can’t make a big splashy acquisition anymore but I don’t think we’ll need another one.
Maybe there’s a better fit but Fiala is a damn good winger and can score.
It’s not that he isn’t big enough , just if you had to opportunity to be picky and choosey , I guy like E Kane or Tkachuk would be preferredGraves probably isn’t coming back because we have two solid young dmen (Bahl and Okhotiuk) who look good and finished better than him as well as Luke Hughes and Mukhammadullin coming up. Graves was terrible the last half of the year.
We also have more than Subban coming off the books. We have 10.15 million tied up in Tatar, Zacha and Johnsson. 6.125 tied up in dead goaltenders in Schneider and Bernier. And a bit tied up in Butcher.
Well he’s a 30+ goal point per game guy. I guess he just isn’t big enough.
You’re gonna have hard time getting support on Kane here and Tkachuk is just not gonna happen.It’s not that he isn’t big enough , just if you had to opportunity to be picky and choosey , I guy like E Kane or Tkachuk would be preferred
Good point, we do have to be careful with how much we commit to someone like Fiala. It is definitely beneficial to have Holtz and L. Hughes on ELC's for the next 3 years and Mercer for 2 more, but at some point with the long-term deals, it could cause issues. Especially when players like Severson, Siegs, Graves and Sharangovich require raises after next year.Right, but as he explained (goalie excluded) Fiala is basically the last player you can really afford to spend on. At the current cap if you are paying around $40mil for 5 players (Dougie, Jack, Nico, Bratt, Fiala) that leaves you with an average of $2.5 mil per player to fill out your roster. Even if the cap were to rapidly expand to 90m that still only 3.25, and a rapidly expanding cap will also rapidly increase players salary.
You simply will not have a lot of room to add salary if you make the move for Fiala now, and your best chance at finding the cheap and good players are the same assets you are giving up to acquire him. So that is why I ask - do you see a true cup competitor if we add Fiala (and assume we get a reasonable goaltending fix) and no other impact players?
Ya I get that and am fine if that’s what we do. I’m just not sure we’re gonna get many opportunities to get a player of Fiala’s caliber at his age. And it’s not like it’s because people think he’s gonna be ridiculously expensive. Minnesota can’t afford him because they have 12 million being taken up by buyouts next season. That’s a rare situation that someone may take advantage of.Fair enough, I disagree on where the team is but I don’t disagree that Fiala is a great player.
I would personally let the current status quo (except the goalie) play out - draft your player at 6, see what Holtz looks like next year, hope Hughes makes an appearance, see how the growth from the other young players plays out - and then make the big move after next year.
Also have Misyul and one other guy I always forget his name that was at one point ahead of Bahl and Okhotiuk as far as potential goes .I’m not sold that he’s gonna be a top 6 winger let alone a top line winger like I think we need. I don’t think Holtz will be good enough even if he turns out. Winger really isn’t lower than Defensmen on the depth chart. We have Hamilton, Severson, Siegenthaler, Hughes, Graves, Smith, Okhotiuk. Bahl, Mukhammadullin, Walsh(eh). It’s just gonna be about resigning and figuring out who stays and who goes. We’re more likely than not gonna end up trading a dman or two. Other than finding a solid 3RD defense is not a big need at all.
Graves should be gone.Good point, we do have to be careful with how much we commit to someone like Fiala. It is definitely beneficial to have Holtz and L. Hughes on ELC's for the next 3 years and Mercer for 2 more, but at some point with the long-term deals, it could cause issues. Especially when players like Severson, Siegs, Graves and Sharangovich require raises after next year.
Not sure who you’re talking about. Vukojevic? Not sure he was every a better prospect than them but he had some potential.Also have Misyul and one other guy I always forget his name that was at one point ahead of Bahl and Okhotiuk as far as potential goes .
Ya I get that and am fine if that’s what we do. I’m just not sure we’re gonna get many opportunities to get a player of Fiala’s caliber at his age. And it’s not like it’s because people think he’s gonna be ridiculously expensive. Minnesota can’t afford him because they have 12 million being taken up by buyouts next season. That’s a rare situation that someone may take advantage of.
It’s not like Meier who has a 10 million dollar qualifying offer.
$2,055,365 - $4,110,732 | 1 Second Round Pick |
If it had to be one of those three Forsberg as he would bring more of what we don't have now over Fiala or JG they are similar to our fwd group now...Forsberg allows us to keep our assets as well...Holtz and our top 5 pick (which we earned with this horrendous season we had) are assets we should hold onto imo....Just tossing this out there to see peoples opinions .
Fiala vs. signing Forsberg or Gaudreau .
Saves having to give up assets but will likely cost more $$ cap .
Plus those two are older in age than Fiala and I see Fiala as a better fit than Gaudreau . Not sure who I’d prefer out of Fiala and Forsberg if age / cost / were equal.
Just asking out if the three which way would you go ?