Camille the Eel
Registered User
Wow thanks I was expecting to get flamed - appreciate the grace.I hope you are right
Even slightly close would be good enough for me.
Wow thanks I was expecting to get flamed - appreciate the grace.I hope you are right
Even slightly close would be good enough for me.
I honestly just wanted to hear your opinion.Wow thanks I was expecting to get flamed - appreciate the grace.
Call me a cockeyed optimist.
By my recollection, they've gotten the overflow broadcasts for as long as I've been with them.They definitely get MSG and MSG+. Not sure about MSG+2.
It's a great example because it just goes to show how much points are a phantasm. Here, Zajac scored at a top line rate. He then went over to the Island and scored at a sub 4th line rate. He didn't have any magical chemistry with his linemates here - pucks just went in a lot. A couple fluke bounces here and there add up, especially on secondary assists.
My point here is that the supposed chemistry between Zacha, Nico, and Bratt is overstated, and that while putting them back together can certainly make sense, there's no reason why that line should be prioritized above all others. The Devils should be looking to find the optimal combinations and there's nothing that shows that that one is.
Man are you're all hopped up on Seinfeld of late.you're a simple country boy- you might say a cockeyed optimist, who got himself mixed up in the high stakes game of world diplomacy and international intrigue.
It's not thin skinned, it's typical Twitter banter, it's supposed to make you laugh. If you read the comments to the Devils tweet a lot of fans love the approach
I'm not sure I agree with you. Zacha/Bratt/Hischier together have a 58.33 GF pct. an expected goals for of 6.15 with an expected goals against of 5.8 an expected goals for pct. of 51.47 pct and their high danger chances for were 28 to 24 against. That's last season when Hischier was broken for all intents and purposes. Some of their numbers were sub 50% (Corsi and Fenwick) but I think they are balanced by the goal scoring numbers. My guess is that if they play together this season they would be better. My eye test suggests to me they have something extra when they play together (mostly because I think that Nico and Bratt give Zacha a simple role that he can do - get in position and shoot first) but it's my opinion and you may see it differently.
Look at you dropping the legal research and looking up fancy stats like the rest of these young whipper-snappers lolI'm not sure I agree with you. Zacha/Bratt/Hischier together have a 58.33 GF pct. an expected goals for of 6.15 with an expected goals against of 5.8 an expected goals for pct. of 51.47 pct and their high danger chances for were 28 to 24 against. That's last season when Hischier was broken for all intents and purposes. Some of their numbers were sub 50% (Corsi and Fenwick) but I think they are balanced by the goal scoring numbers. My guess is that if they play together this season they would be better. My eye test suggests to me they have something extra when they play together (mostly because I think that Nico and Bratt give Zacha a simple role that he can do - get in position and shoot first) but it's my opinion and you may see it differently.
White with Hamilton? lol
Both Boqvist and Foote are waiver exempt, there is zero reason for either of them not to be Utica if they aren’t in the line-up. I don’t know what you think is bad about depth vet forwards, particularly ones who PK, and at least one of these PTO forwards is very likely sticking. I would shocked if none of them did (specifically Vesey and/or Jankowski obviously),Calm down on all the capitals and exclamation points man it’s way to late at night to be that jacked up about this.
First somebody will be hurt likely within the first couple games and then they’ll get in and teams usually rotate guys in anyways. They’re not gonna sit in the press box very much.
Second, Boqvist has played 4-5 pro seasons and turns 23 this month.
Not sure where I said they’re too good for the AHL I just think in Boqvist case it’s better for his development to stay up and he brings more value than any of the other young guys or guys on PTO’s.
I’d be perfectly happy if they sent Foote down and signed Vesey but I’d be happy if they kept Foote too even if he starts as the 13th or 14th forward.
Both Boqvist and Foote are waiver exempt, there is zero reason for either of them not to be Utica if they aren’t in the line-up. I don’t know what you think is bad about depth vet forwards, particularly ones who PK, and at least one of these PTO forwards is very likely sticking. I would shocked if none of them did (specifically Vesey and/or Jankowski obviously),
I'm not sure I agree with you. Zacha/Bratt/Hischier together have a 58.33 GF pct. an expected goals for of 6.15 with an expected goals against of 5.8 an expected goals for pct. of 51.47 pct and their high danger chances for were 28 to 24 against. That's last season when Hischier was broken for all intents and purposes. Some of their numbers were sub 50% (Corsi and Fenwick) but I think they are balanced by the goal scoring numbers. My guess is that if they play together this season they would be better. My eye test suggests to me they have something extra when they play together (mostly because I think that Nico and Bratt give Zacha a simple role that he can do - get in position and shoot first) but it's my opinion and you may see it differently.