Hoglund4MvP
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2022
- 1,172
- 1,416
I just make similar post in murray trade thread using marleau as example. It does seem like we over-react past 2 days about the sweetener.Sens are making moves to compete with the top 3 in the Atlantic. Trading Murray to Toronto is not the same as trading Murray to trash like Buffalo. Murray or any goalie for that matter is guaranteed to get lit up there, but take a goalie with decent skill and put him on one of toronto / tampa / boston / florida etc and they will be perfectly fine.
Logically the sweetener/retention we get from Ottawa will be less than the sweetener they would give a team like Buffalo. Why does Buffalo need to pay Murray? They are rebuilding, they are fine giving up 5-7 goals a game, they don't need to pay a goalie right now.
This helps decrease the sweetener loss a bit, but I agree we lost that aspect of the trade, even though I think Murray will be perfectly fine here. Hopefully he performs at a level we couldn't care less what the sweetener was.
Asking Buffalo to pay murrays salary is same as someone asking us to pay let's say, Loui Eriksson last season. Leafs and Sabres both say "why in the world do we want to pay that?" out of the box, so the sweetener needs to be truly amazing to do it.
Murray is not same "why do we want to pay that?" Leafs actually have a good reason to have to take a chance on murray he has potential to be difference between stanley cup or not but Murray isn't going to do anything to bridge gap for sabres
So if you combine your post with mine it's hard to say it was a fleece.