You don't have to explain it to me, I've played the game. It doesn't change the fact that the Wings don't hit enough AND have issues winning puck battles. If you can't win the puck battle then at least take the opponent out of the play. FWIW, the Wings were second to worst in the league for 5 on 5 takeaways. The best? Seattle. They threw 6 fewer hits than the Wings (ranked #20), but they didn't need to.
Basically the options are steal the puck, win the puck battle, or hit to get the opponent out of the play. The Wings collectively aren't good at any of them, and Burger ranks at the bottom if you look at combined TK+hits. Stats aside, he's not good defensively, and doesn't score enough to make up for it.
I see what you are saying, but I was responding to what you initially said, where you claimed that yeah sure debrincat hits people but I doubt he scares anyone.
Scaring someone with the threat of hitting is irrelevant because that is not the intended use of hitting. The whole point of hitting is not to hurt or injure, it is to take a pawn away from the main board. What you are implying is debrincat scares no one so his hits are useless/irrelevant; however that just is not what the hit is for.
Now, when debrincat hits, does it do what the intended use of hitting is used for? I have no idea to be very honest, but if he threw 100+ hits in a season, I can only imagine that it did what it was supposed to do at least a couple of the times he did it...
None of this was a knock on DeBrincat, I just have issues throwing Ray or Burger on his line. I think those 2 kids are way overrated here.
As far as this goes. I agree partially. Berggren and Ray are what 21/22? I think Ray could get just below DBC levels and berggren would be the guy feeding him. Berggren - Compher - Raymond as a second line i think would work great. I like the thought of a ray/lark/dbc line because of the offensive upside this could bring; however, they could be thrown around a lot and that would put much more onus on Seider and/or walman to answer for it. Of which I am sure they are fine with, especially seider, but if you have the possibility of not needing to do that, then I would take advantage.
This is just an example?!!?!?!!!: But, putting a rough player like Kostin on larkin/dbc would be helpful, although I don't think it would give the offensive output we are looking for. I'd rather not give up on ras/copp/perron line as they did do well, so that takes Ras out for ras/lark/dbc. That leaves a player like Sprong to fill that need, of which I am definitely fine with. Sprong plays much bigger than his size and has hands. No, we aren't going to have the offensive output as dbc/lark/ray, but it would be slightly below that.
The other option is to add berggren and that would be a phenomenal line in regards to offense and puck possession; however, they will probably get pushed around more than with ray on the line. Larkin can obvious muck it up and I am not diminishing his physicality at all, but I am from the era that if your captain is getting pushed around, you hip check the guy doing it into your bench and have your teammates on the bench "help" him out.
Maybe Larkin/DBC/Fabbri? I think that would actually work out extremely well. Just need Fabbri to stay healthy for over half the season.