lol so max term is a fantastic deal?
He's 35 when the contract expires and not 38 or even 40 like some other players. Yeah it can be sketchy there too but what you gonna do , not sign him ?
As we all know with the Lucic deal that power forwards degrade at a much higher rate. Using the same logic that was thrown around in the Lucic thread, this one appears to be even worse considering it's for $9.5 and takes him beyond 34.
I find it funny to read people saying how great or "fantastic" a deal this.
Almost 10 mill for 8 more years. Let's just say he's getting paid, it's a fair contract that needed to be given and nothing more.
Not good, not great, it's simply fair, he's earned it. But it's still a massive amount of money.
He's had serious injuries and surgeries. Can his body hold up for 8 years?
He's had serious injuries and surgeries. Can his body hold up for 8 years?
Other than the emergency appendectomy, what injury has made him miss significant time? It sure wasn't his hips during his Art Ross win.
Never had any problems during the seasons though.
The current one he felt he pulled a muscle or something and went to the doctors . Those said he could play without surgery but risk potentially pulling it out so he got surgery while there's still time to do it.
Thats a massive deal, but he was obviously going to get it when you look at Kopitar, Toews and Kane. I imagine it won't be a great deal at the end of the contract where you generally end up overpaying a bit as the player gets near their mid 30's but thats hardly something to really worry about. I'd way rather have Benn at 9.5 than I would Toews at 10.5, and thats really not even close imo.
It's amazing that they drafted him in the 5th round.
I was hit with sticker shock at that AAV at first but if anyone is worth that Benn is in the discussion.
At the end of the term it will be a steal.