CXLV - Tempe Entertainment District citizen referendum vote upcoming May 16th

Status
Not open for further replies.

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
51,093
43,087
Orange County, CA
The reaction in both this in the Atlanta thread has me seriously worried about what will happen to the site if we get a final four of Dallas, Vegas, Florida, and Carolina. I'm starting to think this place will explode.
Well, this guy did at least



Truly incredible that people are paid to write sentences such as the following

"Meanwhile, we’re stuck with Bettman’s McTeams and squads from Southern Evangelistan battling for Lord Stanley’s Cup.

Enjoy. Or better still — fire up the barbecue, hit the golf course and forget it until October, when the sport returns to a country where it actually matters."

"As of this writing, we’re left with three Sun Belt teams (two of them transplanted from the north years ago) and two expansion teams — one of them the Seattle Kraken, a team that has yet to celebrate its second birthday.

This is Bettman’s vision. The only thing that could possibly make him happier would be to see his beloved Arizona Coyotes play a Cup final in front of 5,000 people at Mullett Arena on the Arizona State campus."
 
  • Like
Reactions: jigglysquishy

MayDayMayDay

F****** Pheasants!
Feb 22, 2012
3,940
2,846
Peoria, AZ
Well, this guy did at least



Truly incredible that people are paid to write sentences such as the following

"Meanwhile, we’re stuck with Bettman’s McTeams and squads from Southern Evangelistan battling for Lord Stanley’s Cup.

Enjoy. Or better still — fire up the barbecue, hit the golf course and forget it until October, when the sport returns to a country where it actually matters."

"As of this writing, we’re left with three Sun Belt teams (two of them transplanted from the north years ago) and two expansion teams — one of them the Seattle Kraken, a team that has yet to celebrate its second birthday.

This is Bettman’s vision. The only thing that could possibly make him happier would be to see his beloved Arizona Coyotes play a Cup final in front of 5,000 people at Mullett Arena on the Arizona State campus."

Damn, someone needs a hug.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom ServoMST3K

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,101
2,766
Well, this guy did at least



Truly incredible that people are paid to write sentences such as the following

"Meanwhile, we’re stuck with Bettman’s McTeams and squads from Southern Evangelistan battling for Lord Stanley’s Cup.

Enjoy. Or better still — fire up the barbecue, hit the golf course and forget it until October, when the sport returns to a country where it actually matters."

"As of this writing, we’re left with three Sun Belt teams (two of them transplanted from the north years ago) and two expansion teams — one of them the Seattle Kraken, a team that has yet to celebrate its second birthday.

This is Bettman’s vision. The only thing that could possibly make him happier would be to see his beloved Arizona Coyotes play a Cup final in front of 5,000 people at Mullett Arena on the Arizona State campus.


Embarrassing.

Nationalism in Canada is awkward af.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Electrician

Warden of the North

Ned Stark's head
Apr 28, 2006
46,714
22,546
Muskoka
Haven't been following this lately, do I have this right?

The citizens of Tempe are voting on the public dollars construction of a new arena, and if it fails, the Coyotes will be without an obvious home long term.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,606
13,117
South Mountain
Haven't been following this lately, do I have this right?

The citizens of Tempe are voting on the public dollars construction of a new arena, and if it fails, the Coyotes will be without an obvious home long term.

There are no public funds going towards the arena itself. It will be privately built and owned.

The proposal includes a special taxing district (CFD - community facilities district), which will collect a portion of sales taxes generated by the new development to pay for land remediation costs and other public infrastructure like local access roadways on the site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom ServoMST3K

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,101
2,766
There are no public funds going towards the arena itself. It will be privately built and owned.

The proposal includes a special taxing district (CFD - community facilities district), which will collect a portion of sales taxes generated by the new development to pay for land remediation costs and other public infrastructure like local access roadways on the site.

That is the same thing as providing public money, it's just not upfront dollars. Tempe taxpayers will be subsidizing the district until the CFD is paid off. And you seem to have forgotten the property tax abatements..
 

Warden of the North

Ned Stark's head
Apr 28, 2006
46,714
22,546
Muskoka
There are no public funds going towards the arena itself. It will be privately built and owned.

The proposal includes a special taxing district (CFD - community facilities district), which will collect a portion of sales taxes generated by the new development to pay for land remediation costs and other public infrastructure like local access roadways on the site.

Hmmmm. Ok. So what is the argument against it then? In brief, anyways.

Thanks
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,606
13,117
South Mountain
That is the same thing as providing public money, it's just not upfront dollars. Tempe taxpayers will be subsidizing the district until the CFD is paid off. And you seem to have forgotten the property tax abatements..

Only people who spend money within the development will be doing any "subsidizing". Tempe taxpayers who don't use the development won't be subsidizing the CFD.

re: tax abatements, I'm not trying to do a comprehensive explanation of every proposal detail. Simply clarifying the arena itself is privately financed and Tempe is not taxing the citizen base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doublejman

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,606
13,117
South Mountain
Hmmmm. Ok. So what is the argument against it then? In brief, anyways.

Thanks

There are probably two main lines of argument against:

a) Something better or different should be done with the land.

b) It's a bad proposal because it includes temporary (8 to 30 year) property tax abatements and Tempe will be forgoing a portion of taxes generated by the new development. Those forgone taxes will be used by the CFD to fund the land cleanup and public infrastructure.


It's pretty easily a better financial deal for Tempe than many other recent publicly built arenas like Detroit, Edmonton, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Minnesota, Columbus and the Calgary proposal. I haven't researched what sort of tax breaks other privately developed arenas have received like Islanders, Vegas, New Jersey and Winnipeg.
 

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,101
2,766
Only people who spend money within the development will be doing any "subsidizing". Tempe taxpayers who don't use the development won't be subsidizing the CFD.

re: tax abatements, I'm not trying to do a comprehensive explanation of every proposal detail. Simply clarifying the arena itself is privately financed and Tempe is not taxing the citizen base.

Yes, "not trying to be comprehensive" is a pretty good summary! Don't let those small details drag you down.

Tempe will not be collecting taxes but WILL be providing services. The cost of those services will be coming out of Tempe taxpayers' pockets.

Pretending this isn't publicly funded is so disingenuous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fairview

Yukon Joe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2011
6,784
4,816
YWG -> YXY -> YEG
There are probably two main lines of argument against:

a) Something better or different should be done with the land.

b) It's a bad proposal because it includes temporary (8 to 30 year) property tax abatements and Tempe will be forgoing a portion of taxes generated by the new development. Those forgone taxes will be used by the CFD to fund the land cleanup and public infrastructure.


It's pretty easily a better financial deal for Tempe than many other recent publicly built arenas like Detroit, Edmonton, Pittsburgh and the Calgary proposal. I haven't researched what sort of tax breaks other privately developed arenas have received like Islanders, Vegas and New Jersey.

In addition to those, I think there's some fairly bad-faith arguments:

-it will increase traffic! Yes I'm sure almost anything you'd build would generate more traffic than an abandoned garbage dump

-SkyHarbour

-no tax breaks for billionaires!

-just straight up anti-development - keep Tempe the way it is


A better faith argument though goes something like:

-taxpayers will not pay for the arena, but will still be on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars in associated costs, like for roads, sewer, associated fire and policing etc. - but will not be receiving the proper tax funding to be able to pay those costs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stumbledore

Gil Gunderson

Registered User
May 2, 2007
31,974
17,950
Ottawa, ON
Well, this guy did at least



Truly incredible that people are paid to write sentences such as the following

"Meanwhile, we’re stuck with Bettman’s McTeams and squads from Southern Evangelistan battling for Lord Stanley’s Cup.

Enjoy. Or better still — fire up the barbecue, hit the golf course and forget it until October, when the sport returns to a country where it actually matters."

"As of this writing, we’re left with three Sun Belt teams (two of them transplanted from the north years ago) and two expansion teams — one of them the Seattle Kraken, a team that has yet to celebrate its second birthday.

This is Bettman’s vision. The only thing that could possibly make him happier would be to see his beloved Arizona Coyotes play a Cup final in front of 5,000 people at Mullett Arena on the Arizona State campus."

Bettman's vision included Matthews and Tavares combining for 0 goals in the second round, and a team with three 100-point scorers unable to do anything 5-on-5.
 

Warden of the North

Ned Stark's head
Apr 28, 2006
46,714
22,546
Muskoka
There are probably two main lines of argument against:

a) Something better or different should be done with the land.

b) It's a bad proposal because it includes temporary (8 to 30 year) property tax abatements and Tempe will be forgoing a portion of taxes generated by the new development. Those forgone taxes will be used by the CFD to fund the land cleanup and public infrastructure.


It's pretty easily a better financial deal for Tempe than many other recent publicly built arenas like Detroit, Edmonton, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Minnesota, Columbus and the Calgary proposal. I haven't researched what sort of tax breaks other privately developed arenas have received like Islanders, Vegas, New Jersey and Winnipeg.

Ahhh that makes sense. Thanks for the primer.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,606
13,117
South Mountain
Yes, "not trying to be comprehensive" is a pretty good summary! Don't let those small details drag you down.

Tempe will not be collecting taxes but WILL be providing services. The cost of those services will be coming out of Tempe taxpayers' pockets.

Pretending this isn't publicly funded is so disingenuous.

We've hashed through all this stuff previously in the thread.

The developer is:
a) Contributing $1.1m/year (with inflation increases) to Tempe for public safety expenditures.
b) Providing an on-site Public Safety Facility (estimated $3m value)
c) Contributing $1.5m (over 8 years) to the Tempe general fund
d) Contributing $414k/year (with inflation adjustments) to Valley Metro (buses and light rail)
e) Providing 3000 square feet of office space for free to Tempe (estimated value $5.7m)
f) Providing free city use of the music venue (5 days/year), arena (3 days/year), outdoor venue (10 days/year) and plaza (5 days/year)
g) Contributing $2m towards Tempe affordable housing initiatives
h) Contributing $1.5m to support Public Transit Improvements
i) Contributing $200k/year (with inflation increases) for traffic control improvements on the roads directly adjacent to the property.
j) Providing Naming Rights for the city of Tempe at no charge

And finally--Tempe will still be collecting a portion of taxes generated by the development. The CFD is only receiving a portion of the taxes generated by the development, not all of it.


Is that going to be enough to cover all the city of Tempe public service costs going forward? I have no idea, but the Tempe city council seems fully onboard with the numbers.
 

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,101
2,766
We've hashed through all this stuff previously in the thread.

The developer is:
a) Contributing $1.1m/year (with inflation increases) to Tempe for public safety expenditures.
b) Providing an on-site Public Safety Facility (estimated $3m value)
c) Contributing $1.5m (over 8 years) to the Tempe general fund
d) Contributing $414k/year (with inflation adjustments) to Valley Metro (buses and light rail)
e) Providing 3000 square feet of office space for free to Tempe (estimated value $5.7m)
f) Providing free city use of the music venue (5 days/year), arena (3 days/year), outdoor venue (10 days/year) and plaza (5 days/year)
g) Contributing $2m towards Tempe affordable housing initiatives
h) Contributing $1.5m to support Public Transit Improvements
i) Contributing $200k/year (with inflation increases) for traffic control improvements on the roads directly adjacent to the property.
j) Providing Naming Rights for the city of Tempe at no charge

And finally--Tempe will still be collecting a portion of taxes generated by the development. The CFD is only receiving a portion of the taxes generated by the development, not all of it.

Ok, what do all those add up to? Do they equal the amount of public funding?
 

theguardianII

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
3,681
1,863
Voters leaving indicate an overwhelming defeat ;|
OH!
Voters leaving indicate overwhelming win too!

Just depends upon which group is announcing.

Tempewins say early voting won for them
Tempe1rst say voters leaving the polls say the opposite.

Figures, but early results should be soon

Tempewins is busing (in?) people to vote, unclear about that.
 
Last edited:

Stumbledore

Registered User
Jan 1, 2018
2,524
4,906
Canada
Bettman's vision included Matthews and Tavares combining for 0 goals in the second round, and a team with three 100-point scorers unable to do anything 5-on-5.
Bettman's vision? No, what you're describing is the annual hope of every Canadian hockey fan outside of Ontario.
 

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,551
31,686
Buzzing BoH
Haven't been following this lately, do I have this right?

The citizens of Tempe are voting on the public dollars construction of a new arena, and if it fails, the Coyotes will be without an obvious home long term.

Only public dollars go to infrastructure and cleaning up an old landfill.

We don't know what happens yet if the vote fails. LOTS of speculating and wishful thinking there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad