Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 27,220
- 14,304
A 60 cent dollarIf the Nordiques made so much money why did they leave? Who abandons a cash cow?
A 60 cent dollarIf the Nordiques made so much money why did they leave? Who abandons a cash cow?
Then you best pray Americans don't take to soccer. If they do, European soccer will be on par with their hockey leagues and MLS will be where all the stars go. Luckily for you, it's not likely Americans will develop that level of passion in the foreseeable futureAs an european in can Tell you that that won't Happen. Like ever.
Atleast Not when they are in their Prime.
And afterwards they Go where the Money is best.
But beforehand they want to compete in the best leagues in the world and compete for in the best competitions.
Kinda like growing the NHL in the American, non-traditional markets, eh?You'd get more weight if you told me you were from South America. It doesn't happen all at once, it'd be a gradual process.
They started off with good intentions...now they're just there to the union administrators themselves employedIn case anyone needed another reason to question union intentions...
Didn't force six other teams to leaveA 60 cent dollar
Actually it did, Quebec and Winnipeg left, Ottawa ended up in bankruptcy.They started off with good intentions...now they're just there to the union administrators themselves employed
Didn't force six other teams to leave
In case anyone needed another reason to question union intentions...
I've mentioned this prior, but I'm baffled by that bit of information. The only person reporting it was Seravalli, citing an "NHL source." Not a single local report from Arizona mentions union opposition or spending, nowhere is it reported what union and how the money was spent (TV ads, direct mail? GOTV efforts and canvassing?)
Most of the local reporting points out that the "no" PAC was outspent by the Coyotes/NHL something like 30:1. And due to that local reporting and the fact that PAC expenditures are publicly reported, we know that the $250k number is wrong--they spent much more than that.
So, I trust Frank as a hockey reporter--local politics? Maybe not as much. I'm really scratching my head at the veracity of that claim, because it's just not corroborated anywhere else.
Ah yes, the "high powered labor unions." The boogeyman of billionaires. I guess they couldn't pin it to illegal immigration?
People are focusing on money spent to lobby on this, but maybe they should have done better with some actual community outreach as well? Try and involve the neighborhoods and communities affected by the new stadium.
[Former Tempe mayor Hugh] Hallman pointed to unions, mostly in California, that demanded that the Coyotes build their project with all union labor. When the Coyotes, to their credit, refused, the unions powered the “no” campaign.
Hallman is well informed, so I’ve no doubt there’s truth there.
yeah when I looked into it the only source or mention of the big scary California unions all comes from Hallman.I'm going to quote myself from a few pages back.
Staying on the theme:
I did find one (1) local media mention, but not in a piece of reportage. It was in an Arizona Republic opinion piece, with the writer saying:
Hallman was lobbying on the "yes" team, so it's not an unbiased take, to say the least. Even that writer indicates lack of corroboration, and not to drag the politics into this story about, well, politics, but...both the opinion writer and that former mayor are firmly from the "unions=bad" side of the aisle. So boogeymanning and excuse-making seems like the name of the game—and this time he includes not just UNIONS, but unions from SCARY CALIFORNIA!!!
yeah when I looked into it the only source or mention of the big scary California unions all comes from Hallman.
Agreed. And honestly as someone who lives in California and has to deal with the stupid proposition system here, it's asking a lot for voters to understand, care about, and vote in favor of three separate propositions that are all necessary to build a stadium.Big "girlfriend in another state" vibes. But based on this thread and Twitter it had the desired effect for some of the audience...it wasn't that the voters didn't want it or the billionaires didn't make their case well enough, it's that the evil unions are just an unstoppable force, manipulating local elections from a whole other state.
For something as important as remediation, you want someone trustworthy of doing it both correctly and actually completing it, not having money disputes with the company hired to do the cleanup. Don’t want to see it left half done and having to stop because of unpaid invoices.Agreed. And honestly as someone who lives in California and has to deal with the stupid proposition system here, it's asking a lot for voters to understand, care about, and vote in favor of three separate propositions that are all necessary to build a stadium.
It probably also didn't help that the guy proposing this new arena got kicked out of the old one for delinquent tax bills and arena charges.
Most residents probably didnt know there was an NHL team playing at Mullett last year.If I were a Tempe resident I would have voted no as well.
...six other teams....Actually it did, Quebec and Winnipeg left, Ottawa ended up in bankruptcy.
The be fair…. Meruelo had endorsements from local unions.In case anyone needed another reason to question union intentions...
Buffalo would be happy; it'd then be the 3rd smallest marketOhioan here who'd love to see a Nordique resurgence!! Atlanta deserves nothing. Houston ehhh, No more FLA teams.
I can break out my brand new, old Nords hat!!!
???Then you best pray Americans don't take to soccer. If they do, European soccer will be on par with their hockey leagues and MLS will be where all the stars go. Luckily for you, it's not likely Americans will develop that level of passion in the foreseeable future
Because that's where the stars play right now.???
The champions league is still sthe competition in Football.
Thats what the world watches. Thats where the players wanna be.
The be fair…. Meruelo had endorsements from local unions.
Work Force PAC was the group behind the No campaign. They’re a national group based in Los Angeles and lobby for unions all across the US. They did the heavy lifting making a series of standalone transactions.
This was done all outside the Tempe1st group.
In this case Work Force was representing unions in California who wanted in on the construction of TED shutting out the locals. Meruelo wanted Arizona workers on the project.
A billion? Would be lucky to get 20% of that. Winnipeg got the Thrashers for 170m and that included a 60m relocation feeThe more curious question is why the owner of a franchise that probably could be sold for $1 billion, albeit to somebody who would move it, didn't himself put down the advertising bucks to try get it done.
Kraken paid $650M but the recent talk about Atlanta was that the fee would be in the $1B range and the upcoming sale of the Senators is rumored to be around the same range.A billion? Would be lucky to get 20% of that. Winnipeg got the Thrashers for 170m and that included a 60m relocation fee
You're local, right? I'll take that on your authority (can't find any shred of menton of such PAC's existence on a cursory search, though some I am sure do that by design). I'm interested in where you're getting that and what the expenditures would have been on—mail, TV, robo-calls, mobilization?
Senators come with an arena. Yotes come with a PO box. Kraken was expansion, relocation is different. Big doubt on 1b for AtlantaKraken paid $650M but the recent talk about Atlanta was that the fee would be in the $1B range and the upcoming sale of the Senators is rumored to be around the same range.
Fertitta would probably pay $1B for them and he already has a stadium in Houston, but certainly the Yotes are worth well north of $500M on even a bad day.Senators come with an arena. Yotes come with a PO box. Kraken was expansion, relocation is different. Big doubt on 1b for Atlanta