Having a good goalie(at least at the start of the season) ended up costing you guys Eichel back in 2015. This time the Coyotes are doing tanking the Wright way!
Greiss
Wallinder
Avs 4th 2022
For
Kessel(@50%)
Hutton
Interesting or no? I'm ok either way rt.
Yes, I get that. Who would be more well-versed on draft lotteries than an Oilers fan lol. But did you see who got Eichel? Arizona finished 2 points ahead of Buffalo. Like I said in my post, good goaltending in Dubnyk cost them in the end.(ignoring the whole butterfly effect yada yada).With the lottery there is no way to guarantee who you get, as they could go 0-82 and be -452, and still pick 2nd or 3rd worst. Wings finished worst by a landslide 2 years ago and we drafted 4th overall.
I don’t think we can retain on Schmaltz. OEL retention is long-term. Can’t have 2/3 spots spoken for already for the next half decade.
I would do Schmaltz and Korenar for Rooney and Georgiev, though. If the Rangers were into it.
The coyotes need an Adin Hill type goalie to just weather the storm for the time being
Yes, I get that. Who would be more well-versed on draft lotteries than an Oilers fan lol. But did you see who got Eichel? Arizona finished 2 points ahead of Buffalo. Like I said in my post, good goaltending in Dubnyk cost them in the end.(ignoring the whole butterfly effect yada yada).
Buffalo may have prevailed last time but this Toilet Bowl rematch will be epic! Of course they'll probably both end up losers since there's no outstanding consolation prize anyway and teams can drop more than one spot regardless, unlike 2015.Pretty hard to outtank the outtankers though. Buffalo traded goalies that year cause they were playing too well, there is just no way to out lose that.
Buffalo may have prevailed last time but this Toilet Bowl rematch will be epic! Of course they'll probably both end up losers since there's no outstanding consolation prize anyway and teams can drop more than one spot regardless, unlike 2015.
2/3 means 2/3You can retain on up to 3 per season is what I thought the rule was.
Exactly right.Are Arizona fans worried about turning into Buffalo with the rot of losing seeping into the foundation of the locker room?
Chychrun, Keller, and Schmaltz certainly aren't a cup winner's core, but you'd have to hope that they can provide some cushion and leadership for upcoming prospects. Will they be able to step up?
Why would we give up a prospect for a vet like Kessel and a much worse goalie in Hutton, plus giving up a 4th? Makes no sense for the Wings to do anything like this.
Korenar + Coyotes '22 3rd for Georgiev
Yotes should have been trying to acquire Georgiev since summer. He’s a perfect option for them to weather to storm, and young enough for the Yotes to evaluate if he’s part of their future after a heavier work load.I’d do Georgiev for Kessel retained absolutely
Vasilevsky wouldn’t have improved the Coyotes record over the first four games. I’m not looking for, and not expecting an improved record. I’m merely looking to cut the per game goal differential from 3.5 to around 2.0.
I simply didn’t think I would be forced to spell this out and took for granted that people would understand a fairly obvious concept. And I’m not going to bother now. What astoundingly asinine turn. It doesn’t happen often, but I’ve actually become annoyed by a post. Lol. Time for a break.this is a wild misunderstanding of hockey, goalies, and basic math. Decreasing your goals against AVERAGE would result in more wins. You can’t just take the improved (but still bad) average you’d have at the end of the year and pretend that’s the bad amount of goals against you gave up every night
this is a wild misunderstanding of hockey, goalies, and basic math. Decreasing your goals against AVERAGE would result in more wins. You can’t just take the improved (but still bad) average you’d have at the end of the year and pretend that’s the bad amount of goals against you gave up every night
I simply didn’t think I would be forced to spell this out and took for granted that people would understand a fairly obvious concept. And I’m not going to bother now. What astoundingly asinine turn. It doesn’t happen often, but I’ve actually become annoyed by a post. Lol. Time for a break.
this is a wild misunderstanding of hockey, goalies, and basic math. Decreasing your goals against AVERAGE would result in more wins. You can’t just take the improved (but still bad) average you’d have at the end of the year and pretend that’s the bad amount of goals against you gave up every night
Yeah, I was being a prick. Bad moment. Sorry.See, I know what you're talking about. You're saying that if you're losing every game 5-1, the guys on your team are going to just throw up their hands and quit too... where if you add a goalie who is better than Carter Hutton and you can keep those losses to like 2-1 for most of the game or 3-2 or whatever... that's massive for the development of guys who might actually have talent on your roster.
You're the one with the crazy misunderstanding. Basically, Arizona is going to get clapped in pretty much every game. So, if you add an average goalie to them, they're still going to lose, but it'll just be a one goal loss instead of a blowout.
Yeah, I was being a prick. Bad moment. Sorry.
Basically, the Coyotes will be the 32nd ranked team regardless of whether they finish with 52 points or 62 points. It won’t matter. So if superior goaltending nets them 10 more points, it’s still irrelevant to the tank as they’ll be dead last anyhow. Except by 6 points instead of 16 points. And the mountains of losses they do pile up will be closer in scoring than otherwise. Which is the main point.