Buds17
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2015
- 8,590
- 3,621
Good to see both parts of the intended tandem seizing opportunity when it has arrived. Somewhat unfortunate perhaps is that opportunity has thus far come for each with the other goalie sidelined.
IMO, this is the best our Leaf net has looked in quite some time… regardless of how awesome Jack played at times.
He does remind me a little like Giguere. If Murray can continue his play, we got ourselves a pretty good goalie.I don't remember him looking this big in Pittsburgh but he's almost like a J-S Giguere out there these days.
His glove hand always looks like it's unnaturally rotated, like up and in instead of out.
I think he’ll be fine in the regular season most nights. The Leafs might be concerned with the rebounds and scrambling if Murray plays In the playoffs when players are focussed on the front of the net.Let's not forget what happened to Soup in the 2nd half of the season last year. The tandem is looking good but we need to find out if one or both both can do it over a full season.
Wasn’t Petruzzelli beyond terrible in preseason?
Still a better gamble than Mrazek ever was. Murray at least has Stanley CupS on his resume.Just wondering if the same people praising Dubas for Murray now, were also praising the Mrazek signing. Early signs say this may work out, but it was still a huge shot in the dark to begin with
Yes. This was always my issue with the Murray/Samsanov signings. They are massive question marks at best, and that's no way to run a club with young superstars like Matthews/Marner/Nylander in their primes. Look how bad it's going in Edmonton(same setup). I have my fingers crossed that it works out differently for us.
Yes. This was always my issue with the Murray/Samsanov signings. They are massive question marks at best, and that's no way to run a club with young superstars like Matthews/Marner/Nylander in their primes. Look how bad it's going in Edmonton(same setup). I have my fingers crossed that it works out differently for us.
This is all true. And this is why we should have been using some of our higher draft picks YEARS ago, to draft & develop some serious Goalie talent that we could have graduated by now. We trade 2nd rounders like candy but surely we could've used a few over the last 8 years to get some pedigree in nets in the system? Hedge our bets? My issue is with not having any Goalie plan in place and with having to rely on all the question marks you mention.
I'd certainly take Vasilevsky on my team.
Yes. This was always my issue with the Murray/Samsanov signings. They are massive question marks at best, and that's no way to run a club with young superstars like Matthews/Marner/Nylander in their primes. Look how bad it's going in Edmonton(same setup). I have my fingers crossed that it works out differently for us.
For the record, there are only two goalies drafted in the past 5 drafts that have played 10 or more games in the NHL. One has sucked, and the other has been just okay, and was drafted far before we would have been able to pick. There are really only a handful of goalies in this league, at best, that aren't "question marks" from year to year, and most of them were fluked into with some mid-round pick a decade ago.And this is why we should have been using some of our higher draft picks YEARS ago, to draft & develop some serious Goalie talent that we could have graduated by now.
Both goalies addressed flaws in their styles before coming here and were trending wellJust wondering if the same people praising Dubas for Murray now, were also praising the Mrazek signing. Early signs say this may work out, but it was still a huge shot in the dark to begin with
Here is the combined "Goals Saved above Expected" last 3 years combined comparing former goalies to present replacements.
Ranked Best to Worst in GSAx past 3 seasons cumulative results.
View attachment 582673
Its noticeable that Leaf goalies under Keefe's system struggle to post positive GSAx stats over his 3 seasons.
There is a belief that bringing in Murray and Samsonsov in front of a better team will improve their stats and GSAx numbers, but that wasn't true for Cambell, Andersen or Mrazek.
I have a feeling you won't get a reply, so allow me!Hey @Mess can we can an update on these for this year?
I have a feeling you won't get a reply, so allow me!
Samsonov: +4.9 GSAx
Murray: +4.3 GSAx
Andersen: -3.6 GSAx
Mrazek: -5.3 GSAx
Campbell: -7.6 GSAx
Boy, that narrative of his is sure taking a hit.
Lol. I don't defend everything Dubas does, and my post wasn't even an opinion anyway. It was just posting the requested stats.Your opinion doesn’t matter. You defend everything Dubas does and you probably loved the Mrazek signing as well. Also, it’s been 4 games lol, I mean he’s done well, but let’s not go nuts
I mean, I agree that we should have drafted more goalies between 2007 and 2015, but we can't go back in time and change that in 2022. We've drafted 6 goalies in the past 7 drafts, so the last two management teams have already been putting more of a focus on it.Yes there's only a handful.........all the more reason to get in there, I think.
As for your 5 year point - Why would you only go back 5 years? Of course not too many Goalies are making much of an impact 5 years or less after being drafted(most are still in their team's systems & are very young). Might need to go back a hair more and "hedge our bets" by being in on one of them. Go back 8-9 years and there are enough. Maybe we could have grabbed one of these guys:
Tristan Jarry, Juse Saros, Carter Hart, Thatcher Demko, Spencer Knight, Vitek Vanecek, Ilya Sorokin, Ville Husso, Igor Shesterkin, Dan Vladar, Aiden Hill, Jake Oettinger, Stuart Skinner, etc.
It's always a crapshoot with Goalies - I get that. But that's even more reason to use decent picks on ones with good pedigree, to ensure ONE of them is actually a really good one. If we had planned on that, we could already have one of the guys mentioned above.