1970 3 teams (Texas, Notre Dame, Nebraska) finished undefeated and all claimed the National Championship. One in the 1920’s season 8 teams claimed oneI can only remember 2 teams claiming a title in the same year. In 1966, it was Notre Dame (9-0-1, tied Michigan State 9-0-1 in their last game of the season). Neither one played in a bowl game. BTW, that is as far back as I can remember most sports.
TN and GA must have won during the 1920s and/or early 1930s.
You'd have a short list of power five schools that wouldn't get picked ahead of Northwestern if the Big Ten was a new idea.
From Wiki, For just coaches & AP polls:I can only remember 2 teams claiming a title in the same year. In 1966, it was Notre Dame (9-0-1, tied Michigan State 9-0-1 in their last game of the season). Neither one played in a bowl game. BTW, that is as far back as I can remember most sports.
TN and GA must have won during the 1920s and/or early 1930s.
Season | Champion | Record | Wire service poll |
---|---|---|---|
1954 | Ohio State | 10–0 | AP |
UCLA | 9–0 | Coaches | |
1957 | Auburn | 10–0 | AP |
Ohio State | 9–1 | Coaches | |
1965 | Alabama | 9–1–1 | AP |
Michigan State | 10–1 | Coaches | |
1970 | Nebraska | 11–0–1 | AP |
Texas | 10–1 | Coaches | |
1973 | Notre Dame | 11–0 | AP |
Alabama | 11–1 | Coaches | |
1974 | Oklahoma | 11–0 | AP |
USC | 10–1–1 | Coaches | |
1978 | Alabama | 11–1 | AP |
USC | 12–1 | Coaches | |
1990 | Colorado | 11–1–1 | AP |
Georgia Tech | 11–0–1 | Coaches | |
1991 | Miami (FL) | 12–0 | AP |
Washington | 12–0 | Coaches | |
1997 | Michigan | 12–0 | AP |
Nebraska | 13–0 | Coaches | |
2003 | USC | 12–1 | AP |
LSU | 13–1 | Coaches |
24 or even 20 seem insane.As a Penn State alum, We Are - safe in all this, but it still makes me sick to the stomach.
I can’t fathom how unwieldy a 24-team conference would be. There’d be years with basketball teams not playing each other - football would be a five year rotation, and a quagmire if multiple teams wound up undefeated…
24 or even 20 seem insane.
I'll say it again, if USC and UCLA can leave their history of the Pac12/Pac10 behind for money, I wouldn't be surprised down the line to see the OSU, Michigan, Penn State do the same. The top money drivers probably down the road decide to break away and setup their own brand new conference. Whether that is a 12 or 14 or 16 team conference it's up to them to decide how many they need to have the quality matchups, academic standards, and TV coverage/markets, etc.
20-24 schools is too many to ensure good matchups on a weekly basis. That's no different than being the what the Pac10 and Big10 were prior to the additions of Maryland, Nebraska, Rutgers, Utah and Buffalo respectively.
Paying more if Michigan plays PSU, OSU, UCLA, USC, ND, Oregon, Washington, etc. to get anywhere from 7-9 high quality matchups a year is worth big money vs. them playing lesser competition and only having 4 high quality matchups per year.
Why would they drop the alas Vegas part of the name? That's where the branding is. No one confuses UNLV with Reno. As for dropping the confederate memorial name, that I can agree with.What could help UNLV in an aggressive push towards Pac-12 membership is a complete rebranding of the institution.
In an effort to distinguish them from the University of Nevada in Reno, the institution would adopt the new name of Nevada Tech University. The Rebels nickname would also be retired due to its unfortunate connotations. The new nickname could be Blackjacks.
There are numerous states where the two largest athletic programs are at University of (state name)/(state name) University and (state name) State University/(state name) Tech. This would make Nevada one of them.Why would they drop the alas Vegas part of the name? That's where the branding is. No one confuses UNLV with Reno. As for dropping the confederate memorial name, that I can agree with.
This is still never happening. You should focus on how the schools out west pick up the pieces.There are numerous states where the two largest athletic programs are at University of (state name)/(state name) University and (state name) State University/(state name) Tech. This would make Nevada one of them.
There's also the matter of those with the UNR camp derisively calling UNLV "Nevada Southern" which is their old name. The rebrand would be an attempt to end that.
NCAA sports are a joke anymore.
To nitpick… the sports themselves are fine. It’s the management that is a total farce. From the top down.
Well yes, but isn’t that what we judge it on anyway?