They are the Air Force though. They have planes.
Collapse of the PAC-12: Oregon State & Washington State left in the dust
- Thread starter MMC
- Start date
DaveG
Noted Jerk
Unscheduled U of Arizona BoR meeting now scheduled for 3:30 this afternoon (presumably local time). Rumors picking up that their announcement of a move to their Big 12 could be coming in the next few days.
Last edited:
Arizona never a football power. Fine program, but never really in the mix for even the Pac12 title for a very long time. But, they were a name brand basketball program pre millennium. Haven't had that same high level consistency in terms of on court success and final 4 since.
If it’s just Arizona, despite the feeling it is doomed - the PAC will still soldier on in some form until the B1G expands and Oregon and Washington likely get the call to reinforce their national Pacific wing. SDST plus SMU to bring in two big markets to get back to 10. Oregon, Washington and Utah remain the football powers and may be willing to deal with a lowered media deal in order to have easy access to the football playoffs and also knowing they will probably not be left out during whatever the next round is.
It’s also been reported that Utah doesn’t really want to move right now…that could change if we are talking a big difference in the PAC and Big 12 deals but they don’t want to be really seen as “following” BYU into another conference and they have cultivated football prestige in the PAC.
Plus Yormark looks very willing to settle on 14 for now. We are unsure of the pro rata terms with ESPN and Fox regarding teams past 14 that aren’t Oregon or Washington. Unless the Arizona board (the unified board that oversees UA, ASU and NAU) throws a wrench into things, it is very possible Arizona is the last P5 to P5 move this round of expansion. I am curious if Arizona splits from ASU if there is some sort of clause or financial “penalty” that they would have to cover that may make moving to the Big 12 more complicated than it was for Colorado. UConn remains a back up plan but they are a poor cultural fit and not P5 so won’t bring the pro rata media increases. And Yormark would have a lot of work to do to convince Big 12 presidents of that fit and of the power of basketball in this entire picture…which Yormark clearly sees as undervalued and as a “moneyball” opportunity in the current landscape. A sentiment not shared by many. But he’s been pretty sharp and forward thinking and if his NCAA tournament “inventory” of schools is just amazing, it creates something of a safety net from any mass conference breakaway from the NCAA.
Of course - if the ACC powers are willing to break their suffocating GoR to escape to the B1G or SEC, all bets are off. Oregon and Washington are nice but the real prizes and the real B1G-SEC battle will be over the UNC’s of the college world.
It’s also been reported that Utah doesn’t really want to move right now…that could change if we are talking a big difference in the PAC and Big 12 deals but they don’t want to be really seen as “following” BYU into another conference and they have cultivated football prestige in the PAC.
Plus Yormark looks very willing to settle on 14 for now. We are unsure of the pro rata terms with ESPN and Fox regarding teams past 14 that aren’t Oregon or Washington. Unless the Arizona board (the unified board that oversees UA, ASU and NAU) throws a wrench into things, it is very possible Arizona is the last P5 to P5 move this round of expansion. I am curious if Arizona splits from ASU if there is some sort of clause or financial “penalty” that they would have to cover that may make moving to the Big 12 more complicated than it was for Colorado. UConn remains a back up plan but they are a poor cultural fit and not P5 so won’t bring the pro rata media increases. And Yormark would have a lot of work to do to convince Big 12 presidents of that fit and of the power of basketball in this entire picture…which Yormark clearly sees as undervalued and as a “moneyball” opportunity in the current landscape. A sentiment not shared by many. But he’s been pretty sharp and forward thinking and if his NCAA tournament “inventory” of schools is just amazing, it creates something of a safety net from any mass conference breakaway from the NCAA.
Of course - if the ACC powers are willing to break their suffocating GoR to escape to the B1G or SEC, all bets are off. Oregon and Washington are nice but the real prizes and the real B1G-SEC battle will be over the UNC’s of the college world.
DaveG
Noted Jerk
yeah, in the 90s they had a good stretch where they had a few top 10 seasons, and had a brief uptick when they had Rich Rod there as coach, but basketball has been their big brand for a while.
on the bolded, ESPN is willing to go to 16 pro rata as long as the adds are P5 adds. Fox is willing to do 14 but it's widely believed they would go to 16 for the right additions. The real question is if they would consider ASU and Utah to be that, or Oregon and Washington for that matter.
If the Pac manages to hold at 8 for now, they'll backfill with SMU, SDSU, Colorado State, and whichever of Boise State and UNLV is more attractive for them going forward IMO. I've even seen some speculation that they'd consider Tulane, though I'm not buying that one.
No Fun Shogun
34-38-61-10-13-15
The important thing to remember is not about the quality of the product on the field, but on the revenue generation. The Big Ten being more or less title-less as of late beyond Ohio State in football and habitually underperforming in the NCAA basketball tournament doesn't really matter when each school gets an enormous profit from BTN that basically any other school would kill for.
So I guess my question to this is why did Big 10 Network do so well, while PAC-12 Network flopped?
DaveG
Noted Jerk
1 - they were first to the conference network game by a good margin
2 - they teamed up with Fox to create the network
and (semi-sarcastic, semi-serious answer)
3 - what was the first game in BTN history?
Tulane is academically a better fit for the Pac-## than Boise or UNLV. Tulane is a pretty well regarded school. Heck, they used to be a Power-5 school, since they were a founding member of the SEC.
Geographically, yes. Boise and UNLV are a better fit. But with two LA schools joining a league that stretches from Nebraska to New Jersey, why can't a league out west add a school based in (the state of) LA??
PAC deals is an all-streaming package on Apple TV+ with no linear element. Initial payout less than the Big 12 deal but with escalators for number of subscriptions.
Hard to gauge on face value without details. Pro PAC sources are touting the potential to go beyond the Big 12 number while Pro Big-12 sources claim the amount of subscriptions it would take to even match the Big 12 number is unrealistic.
I doubt any of these sources truly know yet. I suspect the “emergency” University of Arizona regents meeting this afternoon to not give any indication of a “long-term” decision - these deals are like comparing apples to oranges - and to simply put the Wildcats in a holding pattern. And if they are holding and waiting to digest the information, so is everybody else. I’d be shocked if there is any movement or declarative statement from anybody today.
Hard to gauge on face value without details. Pro PAC sources are touting the potential to go beyond the Big 12 number while Pro Big-12 sources claim the amount of subscriptions it would take to even match the Big 12 number is unrealistic.
I doubt any of these sources truly know yet. I suspect the “emergency” University of Arizona regents meeting this afternoon to not give any indication of a “long-term” decision - these deals are like comparing apples to oranges - and to simply put the Wildcats in a holding pattern. And if they are holding and waiting to digest the information, so is everybody else. I’d be shocked if there is any movement or declarative statement from anybody today.
GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,025
- 44,071
Colorado Springs is a lovely place though. I love it at least.
They can, just, if you're Tulane, why would you do it? Is it worth being in the Pac 12 when you could possibly wait your turn to get picked up by the Big 12 or ACC?
Big 12 also doesn't need Utah because they already have BYU in that market.
DaveG
Noted Jerk
If it's subscriptions based that's bad news for the 9 current PAC teams. The MLS subscriber package on Apple+ is right around a million total, and that's being juiced by having MLS STH's given free subscriptions for the first year. I'd be curious to see what the number is for the amount of subscribers to even get parity with the Big 12 in terms of payout. Apple+ just doesn't have the viewership amount (currently) to make that a good idea to take.
It seems risky for sure. It was always rumored this was going to be the best of mostly bad options.
The simple fact is the PAC was never going to get a guaranteed deal to match what Yormark got the Big 12. If they came in at a flat $22 million versus a flat $32 million - the conference would be immediately finished as a P5/P4. I don’t believe anything Kliavkoff and the PAC home office are going to try to sell here - not after the tire fire that was the PAC Network. But they at least have something to try and spin and sell. I guess we should start at least hearing rumblings if his PowerPoints and graphs were convincing or not.
What could help UNLV in an aggressive push towards Pac-12 membership is a complete rebranding of the institution.
In an effort to distinguish them from the University of Nevada in Reno, the institution would adopt the new name of Nevada Tech University. The Rebels nickname would also be retired due to its unfortunate connotations. The new nickname could be Blackjacks.
In an effort to distinguish them from the University of Nevada in Reno, the institution would adopt the new name of Nevada Tech University. The Rebels nickname would also be retired due to its unfortunate connotations. The new nickname could be Blackjacks.
mouser
Business of Hockey
EmptyNetAssassin
Registered User
One title in 22 years for the B1g. SEC is king for football. If Ohio State played in the SEC they would be lucky to make it to a championship game anytime soon.
MMC
Global Moderator
Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
So sick of this shit
The Big Ten stretching into Maryland/New Jersey was enough
The idea of going fully West Coast is absurd
The Big Ten stretching into Maryland/New Jersey was enough
The idea of going fully West Coast is absurd
mouser
Business of Hockey
Oregon and Washington I can easily see.
I'm much more skeptical on the B1G coveting Stanford and Cal when they already have USC and UCLA. Yes, I know LA and SF are a few hundred miles apart. But USC and UCLA give the B1G a strong footprint across the entire state of CA, which Stanford/Cal would only moderately increase.
I'm much more skeptical on the B1G coveting Stanford and Cal when they already have USC and UCLA. Yes, I know LA and SF are a few hundred miles apart. But USC and UCLA give the B1G a strong footprint across the entire state of CA, which Stanford/Cal would only moderately increase.
Very early and this doesn’t mean the B1G home office or all schools are officially on board but…
Sources: Big Ten has begun preliminary talks to potentially add Oregon, Washington, Cal and Stanford
The general rumblings would suggest the details of the new PAC package have been met with skepticism by the other conferences that it will be enough to hold that league together in any significant way.
Bummed for the Cougars and Beavers. They are gonna get hosed. They aren’t any worse than the brands at the bottom of any of the other P5 leagues - they are just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Sources: Big Ten has begun preliminary talks to potentially add Oregon, Washington, Cal and Stanford
The general rumblings would suggest the details of the new PAC package have been met with skepticism by the other conferences that it will be enough to hold that league together in any significant way.
Bummed for the Cougars and Beavers. They are gonna get hosed. They aren’t any worse than the brands at the bottom of any of the other P5 leagues - they are just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Last edited:
The B1G has already released an official statement:
The Big Ten Conference is still focused on integration of USC and UCLA but it’s also commissioner’s job to keep conference chancellors and presidents informed about new developments as they occur.
I think this means everything is farther along than we think. It appears to me the Kliavkoff has failed and the details of the streaming PAC media deal have done nothing to stave off collapse. The B1G has been saying no expansion publicly and probably been tidying up the details of adding UW and UO behind the scenes - it’s already reported that any more PAC additions won’t come in at full share like USC/UCLA but even at partial share until fully-vested like Maryland and Rutgers were, this is still going to be mountains more money than the Apple TV PAC deal.
I think the B1G may have just been waiting for the Big 12 to pull a few of the lesser bricks away to start the cascade. Sure seems like Oregon and Washington to the B1G and the remaining three 4-corners MST schools to the Big 12 is inevitable.
As I posted in the Colorado thread - feel really bad for Oregon State and Washington State fans. Fine schools and athletic departments that are as power conference worthy as their peers in other P5 conferences and yet just may end up in the wrong place at the wrong time.
The Big Ten Conference is still focused on integration of USC and UCLA but it’s also commissioner’s job to keep conference chancellors and presidents informed about new developments as they occur.
I think this means everything is farther along than we think. It appears to me the Kliavkoff has failed and the details of the streaming PAC media deal have done nothing to stave off collapse. The B1G has been saying no expansion publicly and probably been tidying up the details of adding UW and UO behind the scenes - it’s already reported that any more PAC additions won’t come in at full share like USC/UCLA but even at partial share until fully-vested like Maryland and Rutgers were, this is still going to be mountains more money than the Apple TV PAC deal.
I think the B1G may have just been waiting for the Big 12 to pull a few of the lesser bricks away to start the cascade. Sure seems like Oregon and Washington to the B1G and the remaining three 4-corners MST schools to the Big 12 is inevitable.
As I posted in the Colorado thread - feel really bad for Oregon State and Washington State fans. Fine schools and athletic departments that are as power conference worthy as their peers in other P5 conferences and yet just may end up in the wrong place at the wrong time.
No Fun Shogun
34-38-61-10-13-15
mouser
Business of Hockey
I think the B1G was, and remains, very interested in UW and UO. They had the option to be patient and wait things out last year.
The biggest thing that’s changed between then and now for the B1G is the potential urgency to make a decision on UW/UO if the PAC implodes.
