Confirmed with Link: [COL, CAR, CHI] Rantanen-Hall to CAR, Necas-Drury-25 2nd-26 4th to COL, Chi 25 3rd to Chi (Ret 50% on Mikko)

It had been mentioned before that the Avs had offered Mikko a contract in the 12 mil area. He wanted the Drai deal, so the Avs did what they had to do. Looking at what Mikko would be getting (14m) and what Necas and Drury make next year (8,225,000 combined) the Avs will have almost 6 mil to use to strengthen the roster.
 
It had been mentioned before that the Avs had offered Mikko a contract in the 12 mil area. He wanted the Drai deal, so the Avs did what they had to do. Looking at what Mikko would be getting (14m) and what Necas and Drury make next year (8,225,000 combined) the Avs will have almost 6 mil to use to strengthen the roster.

Half of that alone is Blackwood’s raise.
 
We don't need 5 Rantanen threads.

- Trade thread
- Extension close thread (close it)
- Appreciation thread
- Seph's poll thread
- This shit
What shit?

Seph's poll? Yeah that is.

This is not.

I noticed that you have also falsely shouted that 14mil number around.

Isn't it good to have some facts around?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daishi
WTH do the Avs think Mikko is worth if they weren’t even willing to pay him 12 mill? Did they offer him like 10 mill or something? If so that would be very laughable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daishi
Mikko was probably willing to take less than market value to stay the same way MacKinnon was willing to take a discount to stay. That "discount" resulted in a $12.6M AAV and highest paid player in the NHL status when it was signed.

I don't blame Mikko for wanting what he feels he deserves. Also don't blame the Avs saying no. Miss me with the "Mikko's upset" or "Avs did him dirty" stuff being insinuated.
 
WTH do the Avs think Mikko is worth if they weren’t even willing to pay him 12 mill? Did they offer him like 10 mill or something? If so that would be very laughable.
Bingo!

This trade may very will be the thing that costs Cmac's his job.

Kypreos reported earlier that the Avs had offered Rantanen 11,25mil/8years and Rantanen wanted around Mack's number per LeBrun.
So if Cmac traded Mikko and made our team worse because of ~1,5mil that is terrible.
 
What shit?

Seph's poll? Yeah that is.

This is not.

I noticed that you have also falsely shouted that 14mil number around.

Isn't it good to have some facts around?

You created a thread to post an article. The same article that’s already been posted in the trade thread.

I didn’t like Seph’s thread either, I responded in the thread.

Yeah, this shit.
 
That really got you mad enough to want to fight me IRL like you said in that PM? lol. Let's just drop it

Did I say I wanted a fight, need to learn how to read eh

Woah woah woah, I want in on this.

I’ll fight you both.

Climb the Rockies and we meet in Black Hawk where no rules apply.
 
Well you have a bad taste son.

Happy with losing and Mack zero point performance today also?
Don't you have a Hurricanes board to get to? Mikko isn't here anymore for you to pop up out of nowhere any time he's mentioned.

Mikko Rantanen is an elite complimentary piece. If he could play on the 2nd line and drive it consistently and put up 90 points, happily give him 12M+. I do not believe he can do that.

Let's see how long it takes before he is stapled next to Aho instead of driving the 2nd line like Necas was for them.
 
The number isn't even really relevant anymore, IMO. Whatever it was, it was going to cause the Avs to lose some players, maybe have to trade some players, and forcing us to play a number of AHL caliber players next season, especially if Landy is able to resume his career as well.

The bottom line is: relying on the same core over and over wasn't working.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad