Value of: Chicago trading first overall

slappipappi

Registered User
Jul 22, 2010
4,476
201
Pettersson doesn’t appear nearly as good as Bedard. Hughes would be a nice get but Demko is not a needle mover and #11 is far back for a deal like this.

The Ducks win with Mactavish, Drysdale, Dostal, Gaucher and of course Fantilli.


5th ranked prospect pool by HN and that’s after being 20 something 2 years ago.
And that’s before adding Bedard and another 7 picks in the first 3 rounds.
 

Luck 6

\\_______
Oct 17, 2008
10,302
2,008
Vancouver
The only way I see Vancouver having any chance to trade for Bedard is somehow acquiring 2 x top 5 picks this year and trading them along with 11OA and an unprotected 1st next year for Bedard. It would have to be an unreal futures package for Chicago to even consider it.

That would cost us Hughes and Pettersson for sure, and frankly, it just isn’t even close to being realistic for a multitude of reasons.
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,149
2,007
Lets get crazy:
Kucherov + Cernak + one or two of Howard/Huuhtanen/Groshev/Thompson/Schmidt/Carlile/Duke/Finley for Bedard

Let's say no way, if I'm Chicago. You can put all eight of those prospects on the table and I would say no if I'm Chicago. Be lucky if any are top 6 or top 4 forwards. Far from sure things. And Chicago does. Kucherov and Cernak have fantastic value but Chicago doesn't need guts like that. They'd have to flip them.
 
Last edited:

Panthaz89

Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
Dec 24, 2016
13,723
6,139
Buffalo,NY
Fixed it for you. I mean, you had Eichel even and traded him away. Buff is in continually rebuild mode it seems.
You are completely clueless....all Buffalo has to do is add defensive depth and have a average goalie and we immediately are playoff contenders and possibly cup contenders in short order. Simply look at their roster currently and the age of the team.
 

lanceuppercut75

Registered User
Feb 20, 2016
3,311
1,415
Toronto area
The only way I see Vancouver having any chance to trade for Bedard is somehow acquiring 2 x top 5 picks this year and trading them along with 11OA and an unprotected 1st next year for Bedard. It would have to be an unreal futures package for Chicago to even consider it.

That would cost us Hughes and Pettersson for sure, and frankly, it just isn’t even close to being realistic for a multitude of reasons.
I think the only way Chicago would even think about it for one second is if the trade involves Pettersson + top 5 pick or 2nd overall + top 5 pick (if Vancouver trades with Ducks to get Fantilli pick somehow).

Picks 3+4 or 3+5 or 4+5 just aren't worth trading Bedard.

It's all insanely hypothetical and even then very unlikely. Chicago keeps the pick.
 

Byrddog

Lifer
Nov 23, 2007
7,534
845
Bedard for Dahlin + Thompson + Power would have to be the base to get Chicago to MAYBE consider, and Buffalo would never consider that in a million years. Even if you can find a trade that Chicago agrees to, the other team sending way too much in the trade won't agree to it.
Nor should they. Thompson is the best power forward to come since Lindros. Power is just a Mutiple Norris winner in waiting. Dahlin has finall found his game. The rebuild is near complete there the lack a competent goalie and they’re going to be contenders.

As to the hot new toy going to be picked by Chicago. He has not played a single game in the league yet so pump the breaks a bit here. Not to me mention he is going to be on a pretty pathetic team that has shown not improvement since they started the rebuild. The idea is get the 1 overall this year and still tank a couple more years picking 1 thru 3 expecting to catch the lightning in a bottle like they did with Taves and Kane. This is not an automatic look at Edmonton who picked top 5 multi years and are still not constructed to run deep.
 

Detroit Knights

Registered User
Feb 29, 2012
3,602
2,105
Ya, not happening.....but I'd consider it. Fantilli is an elite prospect, probably same class as Bedard. Yes, I realize how crazy that sounds.
I truly believe that Fantilli is the better choice of the two. Been flamed enough for it and still hold steady with it. I see Bedard being a great player, obvious point producer, no doubt. But Fantilli should have the better career/hardware when all is said and done.
 

EddieTheEagle

Registered User
Sep 17, 2006
1,547
3,103
I truly believe that Fantilli is the better choice of the two. Been flamed enough for it and still hold steady with it. I see Bedard being a great player, obvious point producer, no doubt. But Fantilli should have the better career/hardware when all is said and done.
I can see how in the short term it definitely looks favorable for Fantilli to walk onto a team like Anaheim which is further along in their rebuild, and has Zegras, MacT, Drys, Dostal, and a slew of unbelievable D prospects. It will be far easier to envision that club having success before we see Chicago turn a corner. So, while I don't agree on an individual perspective, I do see how Adam F. is more well setup initially to be successful.

I really hope Anaheim can navigate the cap well enough to keep a solid core together for a while. Would be a great group to see have some success.
 

Detroit Knights

Registered User
Feb 29, 2012
3,602
2,105
I can see how in the short term it definitely looks favorable for Fantilli to walk onto a team like Anaheim which is further along in their rebuild, and has Zegras, MacT, Drys, Dostal, and a slew of unbelievable D prospects. It will be far easier to envision that club having success before we see Chicago turn a corner. So, while I don't agree on an individual perspective, I do see how Adam F. is more well setup initially to be successful.

I really hope Anaheim can navigate the cap well enough to keep a solid core together for a while. Would be a great group to see have some success.
See but I am not even "pidgeon-holing" Fantilli to Anaheim. Even if he falls all the way down to CBJ, San Jose, or even MTL for some reason (obviously probably won't), I still think he has more hardware by the end of his career.

By hardware, I mean the important ones (cup, selke, conn smythe etc.). The art ross and richard awards are great and all, but they are very individualistic and yes bedard would have a better opportunity to win those.
 

EddieTheEagle

Registered User
Sep 17, 2006
1,547
3,103
See but I am not even "pidgeon-holing" Fantilli to Anaheim. Even if he falls all the way down to CBJ, San Jose, or even MTL for some reason (obviously probably won't), I still think he has more hardware by the end of his career.

By hardware, I mean the important ones (cup, selke, conn smythe etc.). The art ross and richard awards are great and all, but they are very individualistic and yes bedard would have a better opportunity to win those.
The "important" trophies you refer to are so team-based that the situation he goes into will be a major factor. Hell, I'd argue that the GM of the team he plays on would have a major role as to whether or not Fantilli is ever put in a position to win a Conny Smythe or Cup.

I'm not sure how you could say he'd go to a team like SJ and still have more hardware. What would make you believe SJ would do a good enough job rebuilding to make this happen? Or do you just believe that Fantilli is enough of a franchise-altering player that he'll elevate an entire club?

Nonetheless, I respect your opinion and agree that Fantilli is a big-time gamer, but there is nothing I've seen from Bedard that would suggest he is any less so. CB98 seems possessed for hockey. Aside from being physically bigger, there isn't a trait that I would say Fantilli has over Bedard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LavalPhantom

King In The North

Sean Bennett
Jul 9, 2007
12,079
2,530
Winterfell
LMAO

Does anybody think Chicago would trade first overall(Bedard) for second overall(fantilli?)

I was thinking of a hypothetical sedinesque scenario where the Canucks make a series of moves to get Bedard. Say something like

CBJ: 3rd oa -- Canucks 11 oa, JT. Miller+..?

ANA: 2nd oa -- Canucks 3rd oa+ podkolzin/lekkarimaki

Chicago 1st oa -- Canucks 2nd oa+ podkolzin/lekkarimaki +future 1st

It's probably to many moving parts for it to happen, but would the value be there for the teams?

11OA + Miller wouldn't even move you up one spot.
 

Detroit Knights

Registered User
Feb 29, 2012
3,602
2,105
The "important" trophies you refer to are so team-based that the situation he goes into will be a major factor. Hell, I'd argue that the GM of the team he plays on would have a major role as to whether or not Fantilli is ever put in a position to win a Conny Smythe or Cup.

I'm not sure how you could say he'd go to a team like SJ and still have more hardware. What would make you believe SJ would do a good enough job rebuilding to make this happen? Or do you just believe that Fantilli is enough of a franchise-altering player that he'll elevate an entire club?

Nonetheless, I respect your opinion and agree that Fantilli is a big-time gamer, but there is nothing I've seen from Bedard that would suggest he is any less so. CB98 seems possessed for hockey. Aside from being physically bigger, there isn't a trait that I would say Fantilli has over Bedard.
bolded - correct

I have no doubt bedard is going to be mcdavid-esque. Not going to argue this. I just see that he has great speed and a weird release of a shot that he is perfecting. He seems to have time and space in the canadian league he was in (granted he may be creating that space, as well) that fantilli didn't get in the NCAA. Bedard will be bullied in front of the net because he is a finesse player, which isn't a knock on him at all, it's just how he plays.

His shot is great, but I think actual nhl goalies will be able to prepare for it because they study film a hell of a lot more than minor leagues. Mcdavid has 50 bags of tricks for his shots and etc. But from everything I have seen, bedard has the one shot with some dangles that they love to keep talking about.

Could I also be jaded that the molesting franchise Chicago won the draft after not having to own up to anything and not having a franchise player for 3 months vs the red wings getting shafted every draft for the past 7 years? Yeah, maybe. But if you really want to go back in my posts from a few months ago, I was sayin the same thing with both of these guys.
 

Ace Card Bedard

Back in Black, Red, and White
Feb 11, 2012
9,069
4,063
The last time Chicago picked 1st overall it worked out pretty well.
No chance KD trades that pick, he’d be chased out of town with pitchforks.

And we can probably all remember how Kane was supposed to be just a finesse player who gets bullied. It didn’t seem to bother him.
 

shakes the clown

Registered User
Jan 11, 2010
1,126
788
Chicago
bolded - correct

I have no doubt bedard is going to be mcdavid-esque. Not going to argue this. I just see that he has great speed and a weird release of a shot that he is perfecting. He seems to have time and space in the canadian league he was in (granted he may be creating that space, as well) that fantilli didn't get in the NCAA. Bedard will be bullied in front of the net because he is a finesse player, which isn't a knock on him at all, it's just how he plays.

His shot is great, but I think actual nhl goalies will be able to prepare for it because they study film a hell of a lot more than minor leagues. Mcdavid has 50 bags of tricks for his shots and etc. But from everything I have seen, bedard has the one shot with some dangles that they love to keep talking about.

Could I also be jaded that the molesting franchise Chicago won the draft after not having to own up to anything and not having a franchise player for 3 months vs the red wings getting shafted every draft for the past 7 years? Yeah, maybe. But if you really want to go back in my posts from a few months ago, I was sayin the same thing with both of these guys.
This is all a bunch of nonsense. Just say you’re a jealous Wings fan and be done with it. :laugh::laugh:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad