Seravalli: Chiarot being scratched until traded?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Suave

Registered User
Feb 9, 2022
16
5
Someone will pay a 1st for Chiarot. Maybe not the Leafs or the Canes, but somebody. Would not be surprised if it's St. Louis, who genuinely need one more LHed top-4 D. He's a player that becomes far more effective when the pace slows in the postseason. See the last playoffs as the prime example.
Something around Neighbours. Please.
 

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,901
6,251
What is so funny? Chairot alone = 1st +. If we add Allen, who is signed for another season at reasonable salary and take on Mrazek's contract, thats easily a fair return.
What is so funny? Chairot alone = 1st +. If we add Allen, who is signed for another season at reasonable salary and take on Mrazek's contract, thats easily a fair return.
Chiarot isn’t getting a first let alone +. If that was the case he’d be gone by now. A better player in Manson just moved with half retention for a 2nd next year and a B/c prospect
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just a Fan

lamp9post

Registered User
Jan 28, 2007
4,445
1,733
3 years difference between them, though.
If you think both will retain their values over the 5 year terms (hypothetical in Chiarot's case) of their contract, age doesn't really matter in this context. If you think Chiarot will decline to the point of being worse than Risto in year 4/5, then maybe reconsideration is warranted.

Given the track record of both, I take Chiarot for the next 5 years over Risto for the next 5 years given similar AAV.
 

lamp9post

Registered User
Jan 28, 2007
4,445
1,733
Chiarot isn’t getting a first let alone +. If that was the case he’d be gone by now. A better player in Manson just moved with half retention for a 2nd next year and a B/c prospect
Can you explain the logic behind this statement?
 

Suave

Registered User
Feb 9, 2022
16
5
Chiarot isn’t getting a first let alone +. If that was the case he’d be gone by now. A better player in Manson just moved with half retention for a 2nd next year and a B/c prospect
He chose to lift his NMC to go to Colorado.
 

Petes2424

Registered User
Aug 4, 2005
8,399
3,054
We’ve all seen the Leafs do dumber things than give up a 1st for a player like Chiarot. At this point, sure, he’d be a small upgrade but let’s be honest… We all know what management needs to concentrate on. You could add Nick Lidstrom in his prime and it won’t matter if nothing changes in net. So why waste the pick?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nylanderthal

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,431
2,723
Chiarot isn’t getting a first let alone +. If that was the case he’d be gone by now. A better player in Manson just moved with half retention for a 2nd next year and a B/c prospect
That B/C prospect is rated as equivalent to a 1st rounder by some, so it's very subjective.... which means we need to be cautious in our analyses.

Also, part of the reason rentals are moved late in the year is for acquiring teams to have accrued enough cap space.
 

Goldenhands

Slaf_The_Great
Sponsor
Aug 21, 2016
10,223
13,431
Chiarot isn’t getting a first let alone +. If that was the case he’d be gone by now. A better player in Manson just moved with half retention for a 2nd next year and a B/c prospect
First, Chairot is better than Manson, one has been declining while the other is at the top of his game. Secondly, Manson is only the first domino to fall, the prize will go up for Chairot and Lindholm. Some folk will look really bad on this board, Chairot easily returns a 1st or the equivalent of a 1st. Expect 1st +
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guess

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,901
6,251
That B/C prospect is rated as equivalent to a 1st rounder by some, so it's very subjective.... which means we need to be cautious in our analyses.

Also, part of the reason rentals are moved late in the year is for acquiring teams to have accrued enough cap space.
Where is helleckson rated as a first rounder? Literally not once have I seen that
 

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,431
2,723
If you think both will retain their values over the 5 year terms (hypothetical in Chiarot's case) of their contract, age doesn't really matter in this context. If you think Chiarot will decline to the point of being worse than Risto in year 4/5, then maybe reconsideration is warranted.

Given the track record of both, I take Chiarot for the next 5 years over Risto for the next 5 years given similar AAV.
Not me. Chiarot in 4-5 years might have gotten slow. To put it otherwise, the 3 years Chiarot was in Montreal are still to be played for Risto.

Signing a guy up to 35 and up to 32 are very different things. 32 just about always makes sense, 35 is pushing it and can bite you in the rear end.
 

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,901
6,251
First, Chairot is better than Manson, one has been declining while the other is at the top of his game. Secondly, Manson is only the first domino to fall, the prize will go up for Chairot and Lindholm. Some folk will look really bad on this board, Chairot easily returns a 1st or the equivalent of a 1st. Expect 1st +
Lol hilarious
 

Just a Fan

Registered User
Feb 22, 2022
698
396
First, Chairot is better than Manson, one has been declining while the other is at the top of his game. Secondly, Manson is only the first domino to fall, the prize will go up for Chairot and Lindholm. Some folk will look really bad on this board, Chairot easily returns a 1st or the equivalent of a 1st. Expect 1st +
As long as it's not Toronto....have at it.
 

burstnbloom

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
4,552
3,980
Honestly, sometime when I look at those chart I'm really asking myself what they are talking about. Especially for Dmen.

It's the amount of shots and goals that happen when they are on the ice for their opponents and the lack of shots and goals that happen for their team. It's not that complicated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad