Brown wasn't really much of a top 6 guy in Ottawa or Toronto either. He was a decent middle 6 complementary piece who got way too many minutes for his actual impact in Ottawa. He's another hard worker which makes him a fan favorite, but that doesn't make an effective top 6 winger on a team hoping to make a bit of noise in the postseason.
I don't think anyone is expecting this team to be among the top tier of teams, but they should be better than what they've shown so far. They shouldn't be as bad at generating chances as they are now (30th of 32 teams in chance generation at 5v5, in the neighborhood of teams like the Blackhawks, Sharks, Ducks, Flyers, and Coyotes). There's something fundamentally flawed about how the team is approaching the offensive side of the game, and I don't think it's just aging talent (though that does limit their ceiling).
I don't buy that Bear has much room to grow and right now he's maybe a third pairing guy. Again, I don't mean to rehash the offseason discussions but in general I don't really think defensemen do much growth after their first season or so. Especially since Bear is now 25 years old.
While i generally can agree to some point that a stat like ”generating chances” might give you somekind of touch which teams are succesfull long term, theres always lots of context to add there why im not overly concerned about ”behind the stats” metrics. I mean, just now we are outperforming the statistic yet again, although the sample size is small.
For example lots of those chances are generated at PP, while our PP isnt build to ’create chances’ - but to ’create the chance’. Same goes in the stylistics of ES. Sure, you have a point there on that maybe the system we execute is flawed offensively, but then again it might also be about optimizing strength - as we lack the footspeed or other qualities required. Propably its combination of both.
And while the averages might have some say in big sample sizes, the game is still played a game at a time. It doesnt matter if you create 10 or 20 chances on a game that you win 4-1. Another factor is how our team also plays like what they are, old boys, and turtle away when having a comfortable lead. That too sometimes end up biting our own ass, but moreso effects the averages maybe more than the result itself.
Just spitspalling for waste of time around here i would actually be interested if you want to see the trouble to break out the generating chances stats into while we are leading vs while we are trailing/tied and compare that to the league. Maybe we still suck, but that has atleast a bit more context imo.
Last edited: