Garland, Myers and Pod for Laine, Johnson and Blankenburg
Yeah this is exactly what I’m talking about. Some weird desperate overpay swing for the fences.
Garland, Myers and Pod for Laine, Johnson and Blankenburg
Touché. So we’re back to a 1 year deal less than 1.15 with a handshake deal for the following yearThe problem with is that the claim was the Canucks would clear $1.15 million in space by burying Beauvilier, but with the Canucks having accrued no cap space, you can't take the entire amount for Beauvilier off the Canucks' cap while only taking a prorated share of Bear's contract. If you're going to consider prorated amounts, you have to prorate both, which leaves the Canucks over the cap if they bury Beauvilier and sign Bear.
I think Luo would have to get fired for this to happen, I can’t see him rebuilding. Only so many off the radar names that would fit the profile.This is the dream scenario and if he was available it would cost too much, I don’t know how he signed a 2 x 4 million dollar contract he would be cheap for the next year and then he would likely getting what Hronek is set to get
But I would have no problem having Hughes at 7.8… Hronek and Dobson at 7-8
Willander, Lekk and a 1st if a fair price but we can’t afford to pay it we need those ELCs
He just can’t stay healthy. I would trade Garland for him straight up if he was at $7m, but that’s about it.I’ve kicked around the idea in my head. The term isn’t bad with only two seasons left after this one. 8.7m is extremely prohibitive and would need to find a way to get that down. I wouldn’t be willing to give up anything if real value either and I assume the Blue Jackets would scoff at that idea.
I think the islanders need to do something significant. Lots of players to trade before Dobson for sure, and the price would be harsh. Just only so many off radar players that fit the bill for what I think this team needs. His lower salary would really help offset the OEL cost and hopefully the cap would increase enough by the time he needed to be re-signed. I do think Luo would need to be fired before this could ever happen (I agree it’s like a 1% chance but I would have said the same about Hronek).Zero chance Dobson is traded.
Everyone in the league would be interested if he become available.
Yeah this is exactly what I’m talking about. Some weird desperate overpay swing for the fences.
Jarmo should be fired before he can swing a deal like that. Absolutely brutal for them.
The hypothetical of acquiring him came up so I responded. I think our biggest need is a top 4 rd, followed by a malhotra type 3CWhy Laine,,the guy spends more time on IR,then he does on the ice.Not what we need.
What we need is Rick Tocchet to stop playing Myers with Juulsen.
You should try and propose it on the trade rumors and proposals page.I’ve kicked around the idea in my head. The term isn’t bad with only two seasons left after this one. 8.7m is extremely prohibitive and would need to find a way to get that down. I wouldn’t be willing to give up anything if real value either and I assume the Blue Jackets would scoff at that idea.
You should try and propose it on the trade rumors and proposals page.
Ha! Blue Jackets fans here are way too unhinged. I know exactly the reaction I'd get.
I have no problem with moving prospects and picks. Assuming they are good deals. My objection is to the budget and cap control. I am sick of us desperately using LTIR to be compliant. You need ELC's or decent waiver fodder to keep your lineup cap compliant. And you should only go "all in" if you have more of a baseline than 18 games into your first positive season in quite a while.It was specific to the one Prospect with a more direct question but I mean at the end of the day you have to seriously evaluate what you have in your system and how many of those guys at each position do you legit see becoming an NHL player then cross reference that to your salary projections and lineup projections and see how big of a hole it creates.
If you refuse to move a prospect because he's the best one while potentially having for example three other projected NHL players is that beneficial? If the player you are bringing in is of the right age and impact Where's the Line? There's only so many minutes in a game to be spread around
I agree with most of this except they are ALL IN NOW already.I have no problem with moving prospects and picks. Assuming they are good deals. My objection is to the budget and cap control. I am sick of us desperately using LTIR to be compliant. You need ELC's or decent waiver fodder to keep your lineup cap compliant. And you should only go "all in" if you have more of a baseline than 18 games into your first positive season in quite a while.
Also, if you have cap space, you can make better TDL deals. Thats where the real value is, and by then you have a good idea where u need strengthening to weather the playoffs.
IMO he would perform much better in Vancouver because he would not be required to lead. Here he could be "just" a player again without the pressure of the team solely on his shoulders.Laine is precisely what we don't need. I'm not saying he can't blow up somewhere, he always struck me as a guy who will play better on a bigger stage. Like if he was an NYR I could see him being a lot better than he has been in CBJ.
Well a blockbuster deal for sure and IMO feasible. Both teams could be improved. But instead of Blankenburg, Peeke.Garland, Myers and Pod for Laine, Johnson and Blankenburg
Romanov instead?Zero chance Dobson is traded.
Everyone in the league would be interested if he become available.
The Canucks do appear to have a couple of defensive prospects that could make the team over the next two years or sooner.I’ve kicked around the idea in my head. The term isn’t bad with only two seasons left after this one. 8.7m is extremely prohibitive and would need to find a way to get that down. I wouldn’t be willing to give up anything if real value either and I assume the Blue Jackets would scoff at that idea.
Other teams may have a player they may move to help them this year.The Canucks need somebody and fast. Ever since Soucy went down to injury, the Canucks have been going into a downward spiral.
Bear would be a nice bottom pairing defenseman, but the Canucks really need someone penciled into the top 4. Bear would replace Juulsen and would fire him out of a cannon to Abbotsford, but the Canucks are really lacking depth on defense.
Injuries happen throughout the season, and if Hughes/Hronek get injured, the season is over.
Hirose looked lost last night. Juulsen looks lost every night. Irwin, Woo, not good enough. It's time for Allvin to get creative. The time is now.
This core is in win now mode. The Canucks 2024 first rounder should be available, aswell as Raty, Podkolzin, Silovs or whoever we have that may entice a team to trade away a top 4 defenseman. Would be great to see if Allvin could pull off another Hronek type deal.
Ever since the Soucy injury, Hughes and company have looked a little lost at times in their own zone. That along with a horrendous schedule, the team is getting tired. I really hope that Allvin has some tricks up his sleeve before we lose out on this wonderful season due to another injury.
Any other decent defensemen out there on expiring contracts?
The healthy scratch we should be eyeing isn't in Columbus it's in Philadelphia: Morgan Frost is on Tortorella's shit list.