Twine Tickler
Registered User
Totally reasonable logic from a neutral party (by the looks of it at least)Reading through this thread makes me think I'm in crazy world. Why would the Leafs trade a young NHL RD for a collection of assets like a pending UFA 4th liner, a rental backup goalie, a massive cap dump or other crap like that?
Hoglander for Liljergren is reasonable. Throwing spare parts at Toronto for Liljergren isn't reasonable.
You're absolutely right, Hoglander and Liljegren are in the same category of value with respect to their similar potentials and age. But I really don't see a scenario that makes Hoglander's value equal to Liljegren's given the scarcity of right shot D-men who can play both sides of the puck. Not to mention it would be trading from a position of need for a position of depth.
But absolutely, if a Canuck fan were to present that sort of framework to me, I would absolutely understand the logic and it would be within a range of acceptability. It just doesn't really help the Leafs.