On the other hand, if he ends up being a 30-40 point player at his peak a first and third isn't terrible compensation. We really couldn't afford to lose him but I don't see us matchingMaybe not, but he doesn't have to be. Suzuki will certainly be the more offensive of the two players, but if KK can consistently put up 55-65 points, while playing solid defensively (which he has shown to be capable of) then he'd be a great player.
He was on pace for 34 points this year with 3rd line minutes for the first half of the year. I can't see him topping out at 40.On the other hand, if he ends up being a 30-40 point player at his peak a first and third isn't terrible compensation. We really couldn't afford to lose him but I don't see us matching
Same here. If Danault doesn't leave he is the 2.5 million center-and gets an offer sheet and leaves anyway. If he is your #2 center you expect to earn 2-3 years 3+ million. And stop adding me to all your trade talks. Or you give him 3.25 show me contract at the least. He is definitely better than our 4th liners making a lot more. If he was 20 years old and had the same season as last year, but it was his first year, we would be excited about him as a prospect.he was slotted to be the number 2 Center. He was going to log minutes this year, played above average for two playoffs in a row. I think he’s more valuable than Hoffmann and Byron. I think he should be getting at least 3. Sounds like some people on this board view him like MB.
again, good for kk.
Weber's contract was also for like 14 or 15 years. KK's is for one. They're not even comparable.Weber could live up to that contract. He was worth that AAV. The fans wanted him to stay.
We all wanted kk to stay, but not at 6.1m. He'll never be able to live that down in Montreal
They must have a plan B ready.I'm more curious as to how the Habs knew this was happening and didn't react accordingly.
As is typical, there's probably alot more behind the scenes than were privy too.
But something doesn't connect here.
So you prefer matching the offer and have KK at 6.1M because you're afraid of another 1st round pick?
I'm more curious as to how the Habs knew this was happening and didn't react accordingly.
As is typical, there's probably alot more behind the scenes than were privy too.
But something doesn't connect here.
They must have a plan B ready.
The implications for this contract are beyond one year.Weber's contract was also for like 14 or 15 years. KK's is for one. They're not even comparable.
those of you that want Bergevin canned (or not re-signed), probably got your wish with this. Molson must be f***ing steaming. Bergevin needed time off in August, I get it, but letting his guard down, ignoring the Canes overtures at a trade, knowing Dundon has a history of being a f***er and hard balling KK over maybe 300K has caused this nonsense. He should've seen it coming and been more proactive. This is where bergevin's arrogance got in the way. sloppy
I think the plan B was/is Kotkaniemi oddly enough.They must have a plan B ready.
Perhaps...but it has to be more than that IMO.It does when we consider MBs body of work...
He has a well established history of poor negotiation outcomes with players he arbitrarily decides to play hardball with and publicly undermines.
Ego before execution. Par for the course.
i don't blame KK one bit either . none. your plan isn't bad, but very, very speculative.I do not blame the kid. KK gets 3 times his salary. I blame the GM. Tampa bay never let their top players get to RFA like this. They sign them long term. Suzuki (this year) and Caufield (next year) must be signed to long term deals to prevent offers like this. If they wanted to keep KK, he should have been signed months ago.
In my perspective, i would not sign/match KK for 6M (let Carolina choke at the end of next year). I take the picks for next years deep draft and look at market for substitute. Once season starts, we get cap relief from Weber contract
I don't want to sign KK at 6.1 millions
I don't want to trade KK for that shitty return
This is why I keep saying that there's no way for the Habs to win this one and that we really got screwed either way.
If I'm Bergevin......
My first and only option is to get something to replace KK with those picks (and not an over the hill center but a young one with potential or a better one)....and I'm talking getting him in the next 7 days maximum.
If that's not possible......I really don't know but I wouldn't ruled out signing KK at that price.
If you ask me to absolutely pick one between Drouin at 5.5M and KK at 6.1M.....I prefer Kotkaniemi.
If Kotkaniemi become a 55 points center.....it's worth 6 millions.
For me those picks are worth absolutely nothing unless we get something right away for them.
So I would probobly sign KK, put him in a perfect situation next year to either keep him or trade him....and then see were we are at next season and if we end up losing him for nothing, so be it. For me those picks are worth nothing anyway. But I prefer to gamble on KK might be ebcoming a top 6 center than betting on those nothing pick which we won't see the reasult for another 3-4 years at best.
I
i truly hope you're right, because if not this is fireable, sloppy and arrogantPerhaps...but it has to be more than that IMO.
You can think whatever you want about MB but there's just no way he would allow another team to set his terms in a contract negotiation.
He knew this was coming and allowed it...they're got to be a reason for it.
,He was on pace for 34 points this year with 3rd line minutes for the first half of the year. I can't see him topping out at 40.
I'd be shocked if the Habs don't match.
They tried working out a trade and couldn't reach an agreement so he said f*** it, offersheet him and we'll move onPerhaps...but it has to be more than that IMO.
You can think whatever you want about MB but there's just no way he would allow another team to set his terms in a contract negotiation.
He knew this was coming and allowed it...they're got to be a reason for it.