Vidic15*
Guest
Toronto exposed his glove hand. They were obviously shooting for it. His positioning is off too. He has a lot of work to do.
Toronto exposed his glove hand. They were obviously shooting for it. His positioning is off too. He has a lot of work to do.
Funny, his positioning was great on lots of saves. I wonder where all these goaltending experts came from all of a sudden?
Yep. I think Zatkoff of Pittsburgh would make a lot of sense. He's signed through next season on a one-way salary. They have Matt Murray (20) ripping up the AHL. Swapping Zatkoff for Desjardins would save them 275K next year.I think Cam is perfect backup like some have said, but I'd still feel more comfortable if the Rangers brought in a veteran to keep on the bench.
Funny, his positioning was great on lots of saves. I wonder where all these goaltending experts came from all of a sudden?
I fully agree. While I admit he's struggled on some plays that resulted in goals on some of them - people are so quick to completely dissect and scrutinize his skill after 3 games.
He'll be fine.
Yea, that kind of snap judgment is only allowed if he does well people.
He's done well in more than a "snap judgement" sampling of games. Now all of a sudden people are qualifying those past games (including shutouts and amazing performances) as "backup goalie games".
lol, WTF is a backup goalie game? A game is a game, the guy has shown he has the skills and mental fortitude. He hasn't played well since Hank went down, does that mean he doesn't have the ability to? His past performance shows otherwise.
If you're going to pass final judgement you'd be doing him justice by weighing in all those other games more heavily versus his recent stretch. Good thing for him he's going to have a bunch more games to prove himself.
He's done well in more than a "snap judgement" sampling of games. Now all of a sudden people are qualifying those past games (including shutouts and amazing performances) as "backup goalie games".
lol, WTF is a backup goalie game? A game is a game, the guy has shown he has the skills and mental fortitude. He hasn't played well since Hank went down, does that mean he doesn't have the ability to? His past performance shows otherwise.
If you're going to pass final judgement you'd be doing him justice by weighing in all those other games more heavily versus his recent stretch. Good thing for him he's going to have a bunch more games to prove himself.
It is, and this recent stretch is microscopic compared. So the jury is very much still out either way.Regardless of any of that, the 30-whatever games Talbot had played prior to this point IS a small sample size.
There is something to be said about a "backup goalie game."
Talbot has spot started generally against lesser competition with a team that has played pretty darn well in front of him more often than not (knowing you've got the backup in goal instead of the future hall of famer probably has something to do with that mentally).
Anyway, I like Talbot. He's had a rough start as a full-time starter here. I dont think thats enough to say we're doomed. But I also don't know why people can't call it what it is -- a poor and ominous start to his full-time duties.
Great thinking to **** all over him after a couple of somewhat shaky games. He was absolutely stellar tonight, and quite good against the Avs. I was fairly positive that once he had a couple games to get settled in he'd start playing very well.
He's still a backup goaltender in the NHL.