haveandare
Registered User
All right, he may not be the best in the league, but you can't put up numbers like he has in the NHL even over a small 20 game sample of (somewhat) sheltered starts unless you're really good.
He is good enough to be a starter in the NHL and probably good enough to be in the top half. Having two excellent goaltenders is nice, but wasteful. Since Lundquist has greater trade value because of his super stardom and track record, which you point out, and because his impact on the cap is far greater and because he is older with less upside potential, it makes far more sense to trade him than it would make to trade Talbot.
Bold moves like going with Talbot and trading Lundquist in this situation is what separates the hairy men with testicles and vision from the boys.
You can be very good for short spurts and not be great over the long haul. Many goalies have done it. Goalies have done it here in the not too distant past.
I disagree about him being in the top half of starters, and I completely disagree about it making far more sense to trade Hank than Talbot.
Bold moves like that are what ruins years of team building.