Player Discussion Cam Talbot (G)

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
The capspace/assets used to address our goaltending could have been used to address our D. Our team is stronger with another top 4 defender in our line up than having an aging goaltender on an expiring contract.

The way our D is coached and playing, Shesterkin and Sorokin wouldn't be able to save us. We acquired Talbot and put him in a position to fail by having him play behind our D.

We acquired Talbot for a prospect goaltender. What kind of D can you acquire in the offseason with a prospect goaltender?
 

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,475
3,548
Brampton
We acquired Talbot for a prospect goaltender. What kind of D can you acquire in the offseason with a prospect goaltender?
Doesn't have to be Gus for a D or G as the only options. If Dorion thinks Talbot is a part of the solution, that's fine, but do what you need to in order to make sure the blueline isn't going to undermine efforts to help the backend.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,780
10,666
Montreal, Canada
So Dorion really threw an extension at Talbot? Damn, only Alfie and Ryan Reynolds could save him from himself

Damn, we're lucky it was turned down

I'm truly surprised Dorion watched him play this year and said "yeah we need another year or two of this."


Good lord.

Surprised? I am way way beyond that type of reaction with Dorion. Now it's a mix of laughter, frustration, sadness and joy.

Trade him for Gustavvson! That’s still on the table right Dorion?? Right?

I would trade Talbot, Joseph, a 2nd, a 4th and maybe more to get back any of Paul, Brown or Gustavsson.

Our pro scouting has been so harmful
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icelevel

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,201
34,976
We acquired Talbot for a prospect goaltender. What kind of D can you acquire in the offseason with a prospect goaltender?
I think space in the budget might have been the key resource that could have been re-allocated,

That said, it's tough to argue hypothetical moves, I mean, we could have used the room we allocated on Talbot to improve the D by signing someone like Rutta but it takes two to make a trade or sign a contract,

I'm of the mind that we should be running with a goalie of the future as our backup once they hit waiver eligibility, I don't mind having a more proven vet like Talbot while a guy like Gus or Sogaard proves themselves, where I think we made a mistake was extending Forsberg earlier if we didn't think he was good enough to be that proven vet when we knew Gus was going to be waiver eligible. When we signed Forsberg, I assumed it was for him to be that vet.

In the end, it seems the team had given up on Gus, and needed to bridge to Sogaard instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,201
34,976
Anytime a goalie gets beat short side like that it doesn't look good. Screen or no screen, positioning shouldn't change too much just because of that.
The sight line was fine, he was just worried about needing to respect the pass option so he couldn't come out

I thought he had a great bounce back after the second goal, made some big saves. If he plays like that every game, you're pretty happy imo
 

jbeck5

Registered User
Jan 26, 2009
16,973
3,818
I think it's because the sens were outshooting Detroit like 20-9 or something and the score was 2-1 Detroit, and they hear Talbot didn't want to re-sign in Ottawa, so naturally people put all this info and think "f Talbot" and then the fact Ottawa poured it on offensively for 6 goals doesn't affect their thoughts on Talbot who's irrelevant for offense.

Fairly or unfairly, he would get negative comments.
 

AchtzehnBaby

Global Matador
Mar 28, 2013
15,503
9,354
Hazeldean Road
I think it's because the sens were outshooting Detroit like 20-9 or something and the score was 2-1 Detroit, and they hear Talbot didn't want to re-sign in Ottawa, so naturally people put all this info and think "f Talbot" and then the fact Ottawa poured it on offensively for 6 goals doesn't affect their thoughts on Talbot who's irrelevant for offense.

Fairly or unfairly, he would get negative comments.

He didn’t say he didn’t want to resign in ottawa

It is more like he doesn’t like the offer.

Remember when EK65 did that? :naughty:
 
  • Like
Reactions: DueDiligence

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,201
34,976
He didn’t say he didn’t want to resign in ottawa

It is more like he doesn’t like the offer.

Remember when EK65 did that? :naughty:
Well, we don't know why he rejected the offer, if the reports are even accurate, but tbh most people were happy he didn't extend since his season has been really up and down, when he's good he's been good enough to give us a chance to win, but when he's been bad, he's been really bad. Is that on him, or the 5 guys in front of him, or a combination of the two, idk, but if we want to contend we need to sort that stuff out
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,780
10,666
Montreal, Canada
Nothing to see, I really dislike the trade, I think Talbot is an average goalie at the NHL level but the average fan doesn't know/understand goaltending much. Heck I have played with some guys for decades and they still ask me basic questions

Full credit to Bertuzzi on the 1st goal, slick move, great reach that kinda threw Talbot off guard who didn't expect Bertuzzi to be able to pull that off and go all around him

2nd goal is on the PP, David Perron is a vet who now scored 284 NHL goals. He just used Hamonic as a screen for a fraction second. The most important thing for a goalie when facing a shot is to see all the angles (puck, stick, ice location, etc) and how the puck was shot. Talbot could have stopped it but it would have been a reaction save, not from anticipation. I made a save like that last game with my right shoulder. There was a lot of traffic and didn't see anything, just saw the puck at the last second and had a quick reaction. But you're not going to save all of these all the time.

So this is just usual fans complaining about things they don't know. Heck you have no idea how some people here in Montreal went full Pejorative Slur to blast Carey Price for years.
 

AchtzehnBaby

Global Matador
Mar 28, 2013
15,503
9,354
Hazeldean Road
Well, we don't know why he rejected the offer, if the reports are even accurate, but tbh most people were happy he didn't extend since his season has been really up and down, when he's good he's been good enough to give us a chance to win, but when he's been bad, he's been really bad. Is that on him, or the 5 guys in front of him, or a combination of the two, idk, but if we want to contend we need to sort that stuff out
Everyone needs to realize we have shitty defence in front of the goalies for years. All goalies have shit games but some of this fan base has never been happy with the netminders for years. They love the prospects… they also don’t love the goalies until they are gone. Talbot was a good pickup. He may have had some struggles, but for this team to move forward we need to accept that we are not always have the leagues best in every position. We need a balanced group with strengths and weaknesses.
 

stempniaksen

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
11,172
4,495
Nothing to see, I really dislike the trade, I think Talbot is an average goalie at the NHL level but the average fan doesn't know/understand goaltending much. Heck I have played with some guys for decades and they still ask me basic questions

Full credit to Bertuzzi on the 1st goal, slick move, great reach that kinda threw Talbot off guard who didn't expect Bertuzzi to be able to pull that off and go all around him

2nd goal is on the PP, David Perron is a vet who now scored 284 NHL goals. He just used Hamonic as a screen for a fraction second. The most important thing for a goalie when facing a shot is to see all the angles (puck, stick, ice location, etc) and how the puck was shot. Talbot could have stopped it but it would have been a reaction save, not from anticipation. I made a save like that last game with my right shoulder. There was a lot of traffic and didn't see anything, just saw the puck at the last second and had a quick reaction. But you're not going to save all of these all the time.

So this is just usual fans complaining about things they don't know. Heck you have no idea how some people here in Montreal went full Pejorative Slur to blast Carey Price for years.

I don't really disagree with most of your post, but I have to nitpick on the 2nd goal.

Looked like he was cheating, anticipating the pass, but technically he should have never come off his post. There shouldn't have been space to score short side. I was watching the Red Wings feed and the commentator made a similar note. Hamonic should probably do something other than try and play goalie on that play, but if Talbot stays where he's "supposed" to be the puck doesn't go in.

All that said, in Talbot fashion, he gave one up that he probably shouldn't of and then settled down to play a solid game. I feel like he's good for one or two of these brain farts/game, but as you alluded to he's still an average NHL goalie so he ends up regressing to the middle a little bit.
 

jbeck5

Registered User
Jan 26, 2009
16,973
3,818
Everyone needs to realize we have shitty defence in front of the goalies for years. All goalies have shit games but some of this fan base has never been happy with the netminders for years. They love the prospects… they also don’t love the goalies until they are gone. Talbot was a good pickup. He may have had some struggles, but for this team to move forward we need to accept that we are not always have the leagues best in every position. We need a balanced group with strengths and weaknesses.

Well, they have a point. In the 30 years the teams been around, how many seasons did we go into the season with a top 10 netminder? Maybe the Hasek year and a couple Andy years where he missed half the year, but even then he was more ranked in the 10-20 range or even 20-30 for most of his time here.

Historically, we haven't had great goaltending, so historically, you should notice a lot of goaltending criticism. We never have a top goalie for any stretch of seasons like other teams have.
 

AchtzehnBaby

Global Matador
Mar 28, 2013
15,503
9,354
Hazeldean Road
Reputable source



probably wrong way to think about it… but, I think some people love to get on board the latest player hate-train without even looking at the stats/facts.
 

Mingus Dew

Microphone Assassin
Oct 7, 2013
5,636
4,196
Reputable source



probably wrong way to think about it… but, I think some people love to get on board the latest player hate-train without even looking at the stats/facts.


Neither guy is a starter in this league and that's just the way it is. They can both be complimentary pieces on a good team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

Alex1234

Registered User
Oct 14, 2014
16,691
6,798
He was .917 last game
If he could give us .910-.915 hockey that would be solid goaltending
Korpisalo is doing just that at 28yo and 1.3M$ on a mediocre+ Jackets team and is UFA
Maybe ...
 

Ice-Tray

Registered User
Jan 31, 2006
16,630
8,538
Victoria
Well, we don't know why he rejected the offer, if the reports are even accurate, but tbh most people were happy he didn't extend since his season has been really up and down, when he's good he's been good enough to give us a chance to win, but when he's been bad, he's been really bad. Is that on him, or the 5 guys in front of him, or a combination of the two, idk, but if we want to contend we need to sort that stuff out
Bruce commented last game that he didn’t even think an official offer was made…

it’s all speculation.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,201
34,976
Bruce commented last game that he didn’t even think an official offer was made…

it’s all speculation.
Bruce hasn't been very plugged in lately, we signed Zub the day after he said they were nowhere close, I agree it's all speculative but I have very little faith in Bruce's speculation these days.
 

Ice-Tray

Registered User
Jan 31, 2006
16,630
8,538
Victoria
Bruce hasn't been very plugged in lately, we signed Zub the day after he said they were nowhere close, I agree it's all speculative but I have very little faith in Bruce's speculation these days.
Eh, It’s all speculation, even about how plugged in or not Bruce is. He says the same stuff he’s always said.

I have the same amount of faith I’ve always had in all of the insiders, which is little.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad