DraftBuzz #34.
Gretzky did a poor job of describing Frederic - IMO he has upside to be a hybrid #2C-#3C. He was not surrounded well, and it seems every major scouting outlet missed the small subtle skill plays he showed. Added bonus he tested really well with NHL grade physical markers.
Wasn't on board with Zboril last year that high, and didn't like DeBrusk over Barzal/Connor, but take a deeper look at the last three drafts. BOS fans have a deep, diverse pool to be excited about.
This year was a very strong draft for the team all the way down. Proper values on all picks, except for Steen who was a value grab and top 100 talent IMO. Every one of those kids could play on my team any day of the week.
Interesting note: the last prospect we were high on with this much of a spread publicly in rank, yet close to NHL Draft selection...2015's Sebastian Aho.
A guy with his size, athleticism, and defensive instincts putting up the points like he is is pretty impressive. He leads the University of Wisconsin in points with 3g-5a-8p in 5 games including a SH GWG last night. Hopefully he can keep it up and more than justify being drafted 29th. So far so good.
He was unfairly catching extreme backlash for the guys who appear to of been over drafted last year in Debrusk and Senyshyn.Didn't you read the first 3 pages of this thread? He's a bum who will never amount to anything so don't come in here posting about how he is actually playing...there's no room for that sort of thing here.
![]()
we were told over and over Connor/Barzal were way better then the Senyshyn pick. Both have not produced like how the projections and the bob mob said they would
Ummm...what? Connor and Barzal have been everything they were hyped to be since they were drafted. And then some. Konecny too for that matter, as he was often grouped with them in that range. But whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess.
Ummm...what? Connor and Barzal have been everything they were hyped to be since they were drafted. And then some. Konecny too for that matter, as he was often grouped with them in that range. But whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess.
Maybe just maybe the Bruins scouting staff is better than the keyboard Warriors of scouting on here. Maybe
Maybe there is reason they get paid and the keyboard warriors don't
Maybe
Just a thought
Maybe just maybe the Bruins scouting staff is better than the keyboard Warriors of scouting on here. Maybe
Maybe there is reason they get paid and the keyboard warriors don't
Maybe
Just a thought
The Bruins' U.S scouting staff is above-average.
Last 5 years:
1st
McAvoy (14th)
Frederic (29th)
2nd
Forsbacka-Karlsson (45th)
Lindgren (49th)
Donato (56th)
3rd and later
Grzelcyk (85th)
Fitzgerald (120th)
Ferlin (121st)
Clarke (136th)
Bjork (146th)
Sherman (150th)
O'Gara (151st)
Hughes (165th)
Becker (195th)
Hargrove (205th)
Some really good value picks in there.
The Bruins' U.S scouts being among the best in the league doesn't change the fact that the rest of their scouting staff is below average, and selecting Zboril, DeBrusk and Senyshyn in the top 15 in 2015 was a massive scouting failure, especially given the names still on the board.
What the **** are the Bruins doing and saying???
Eh, it's actually been proven that an algorithm that drafts players based on point production performs better than actual scouts. That is to say that point production, weighted based on the league, predicts success better than draft ranking.
But yeah, appeal to authority, you know there are people everywhere that get paid to do jobs that they're bad at, right?
yeah....and the Bruins staff aren't those people![]()
That is extremely extremely arguable.
The uproar about Frederic was not the pick itself, but rather that the Bruins scouts themselves said that they knew Frederic only had third line upside and they drafted him in the 1st round anyway. If he ends up anything better than a third liner, the Bruins plain and simple got lucky.
Frederic is not going to be a top-two-line guy, we know that. But he has some jam. He plays hard with the penalty minutes. We were fortunate to get him. We believed he was our next guy and we really liked the projection of him as a staff. Everybody raved about him, his character is outstanding. He’s an athlete.â€
That is extremely extremely arguable.
The uproar about Frederic was not the pick itself, but rather that the Bruins scouts themselves said that they knew Frederic only had third line upside and they drafted him in the 1st round anyway. If he ends up anything better than a third liner, the Bruins plain and simple got lucky.
4 point night from Frederic. Brings his totals to 6 in 4 games. Watching highlights and some of the recent interviews and he really does play like Backes-type.
A guy with his size, athleticism, and defensive instincts putting up points like he is is pretty impressive. He leads the University of Wisconsin in points with 3g-5a-8p in 5 games including a SH GWG last night. Hopefully he can keep it up and more than justify being drafted 29th. So far so good.
The Bruins' U.S scouts being among the best in the league doesn't change the fact that the rest of their scouting staff is below average, and selecting Zboril, DeBrusk and Senyshyn in the top 15 in 2015 was a massive scouting failure, especially given the names still on the board.
So...all this defending of the pick and revival of the discussion is based on a two game hot streak and sample size in his post-draft year at the collegiate level? Considering, going by pretty simple math, prior to his four point night recently he was at 2 P in 3 games. Again, very early in the season, in his post-draft year, at the collegiate level.
...I mean, come on. I don't know how some of you guys live a daily life when you get worked up this easily.
This is a thread to talk about Frederic. I didn't say anything but he's off to a good start. You on the other hand try to get personal. Who's really worked up here?,
Frederic is off to a good start, if he had 0 points through 6 games people would be declaring him a bust. He deserves a little credit for a great start.
I'm sorry that people talking about a hockey prospect playing well upsets you so much.
4 point night from Frederic. Brings his totals to 6 in 4 games. Watching highlights and some of the recent interviews and he really does play like Backes-type.
I also think his game will translate to the Pros. Seemed to have good positioning, and always had his feet under him...good poise. Don't know how physical he is, but at the college level there aren't too many players who are going to be moving him. I don't see him being anywhere near as physical as Backes. Not nearly as thick. Stylistically, he looks more like a poor man's Toews.
Developing ahead of his curve so far, Maybe the Backes comparision is not far off
If you do not do what Bob Mackenzie says in Canada then that team is deemed to be off the list and are going be ridiculed. If thats the case, then right now as we were told over and over Connor/Barzal were way better then the Senyshyn pick. Both have not produced like how the projections and the bob mob said they would. Of course they are good players and deserved to be picked high and will produce but the riducule comparisons at the time were extreme. Hard to please the general public when a team picks for needs over BPA. Clearly that is what Sweeney has done the last few years and has done a very good job. The public is told there opinion and do not agree. Bruins are stacked at each position and only need to find a game breaker thru an internal riser or trade, the depth again can afford that option. There has been a lot of 1st round busts and a lot of late picks who turn out. Lists are important but the internal lists needs, scouting and interviews are more important. As for Frederick last week he lead the team in pts and is 2nd right now 8 pts in 6 games. Has size, skill and time to get better. Bergeron/Marchand were both second rounders.
Maybe just maybe the Bruins scouting staff is better than the keyboard Warriors of scouting on here. Maybe
Maybe there is reason they get paid and the keyboard warriors don't
Maybe
Just a thought
Nah, it isn't
They are better than you at evaluating talent, fact not opinion