He's been good.
1 assist on this Swedish team for an offensive player? That has to be disappointing.
He's been good.
1 assist on this Swedish team for an offensive player? That has to be disappointing.
not a good WJC for him so far.
He has been alot better then the stats, but still a disapointment, could imaging he has fall a bit in the rankings depending on how high he was before.
Because of 5 games? Doubt it.
I didnt say he would fall from 1oa to 7th round or anything crazy like that, but depending on where they had him rank before he can have fall, wjc 20 have a impact. It is hard to have him ahead of Hischer now for example, unless he ends wjc 20 in a great way.
You can clearly see his potential fantastic stickhandling but he has to put on much muscles so he have better balance if he can do that then he will be soo hard to stop
In all seriousness, when was the last time that a high level prospect failed to pan out as a result of being too thin? Can't recall one in the 15 years I have followed the draft
I didnt say he would fall from 1oa to 7th round or anything crazy like that, but depending on where they had him rank before he can have fall, wjc 20 have a impact. It is hard to have him ahead of Hischer now for example, unless he ends wjc 20 in a great way.
I think Hischier is creating some distance at the top. Past that it is pretty debatable, but he has a strong case for 2nd.I'd have Pettersson as the #1 prospect of 2017 draft eligibles who played in the WJC's.
I think Hischier is creating some distance at the top. Past that it is pretty debatable, but he has a strong case for 2nd.
He has more points, but Nylander had a better skill set at comparable ages and also showed much better at IIHF events at the same age (mainly look at the U-18's as 17 year olds).PPG in a mens league. Better in his pre-draft season than Nylander, Wennberg, Forsberg.
I'll take Pettersson. I think he has more upside. Hischier is good as well, I'd have him #2 among that list.
He has more points, but Nylander had a better skill set at comparable ages and also showed much better at IIHF events at the same age (mainly look at the U-18's as 17 year olds).
What Pettersson is doing is impressive. But, I don't think you can analyze him fully by just looking at the box score.
I, personally think he should have been second, and in the actual rankings, I'd say he's in the higher end of that 3 to 7 tier with Vilardi, Necas, Liljegren, and Mittelstadt. I really wonder why so many scouts would have Vesalainen so high. I'd be afraid of him in the top 20.Well, I haven't. I think he might have the best hockey sense in the draft, and I also think he has really good skill with the puck. I think his smarts on the ice make the rest of his game play up. I've watched him play a number of times. Looks like a future 1st line player in the NHL, although he needs to improve his skating and gain some weight.
I agree with you that Nylander has a better skill-set, but Nylander also might go second in a 2014 re-draft. Saying Nylander has a better skill-set doesn't mean Pettersson isn't a better prospect than Hischier.
Even if Hischier is a better prospect, putting Pettersson 6th from 2017 players is crazy.
I really wonder why so many scouts would have Vesalainen so high. I'd be afraid of him in the top 20.
He's definitely not Puljujarvi, and he seems closer to De La Rose than Crouse.I guess its down to whether you think he can score in the NHL or not. He's a big, strong winger who can skate. Those types of players usually get a lot of discussion for the first round, and sometimes the top ten. The question about him will be is he Crouse or is he Puljujarvi? I'd lean towards the latter, so I'd have him more in the 20 range, but maybe there are some people who think he'll score at a first or second line pace.