Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 16,591
- 7,831
I'm just going to assume that you'll overrate the Finns, because there is absolutely nothing to suggest that anyone would have Laine over Matthews. That's like Rantanen over Eichel.
C Auston Matthews - ZSC Lions, NLA (2016 Draft) II
- Thread starter JawandaPuck
- Start date
- Status
cleveland408
Registered
- Apr 12, 2014
- 1,369
- 229
What does this have to do with McDavid?
Anyway since you mentioned it, I do believe that McDavid was too good for the CHL and playing in Europe with and against men would've done him lots of good.
Some of those lists have input from NHL scouts though. And some of those lists even are used by NHL scouts as a good reference point. Not every team has eyes on guys 2-3 years out of their draft year outside of maybe once a year, even if they're as good as Matthews. The independent services are watching kids 4-5 years out of their draft year and putting up rankings well in advance.
There's a reason that Matthews is a consensus #1 on every independent list. Not all of those people are stupid. Could that change in 4-5 months? Yeah sure. But it won't change at this camp.
For whatever it's worth at this camp last year the buzz was that there were multiple scouts and GMs in attendance who ranked Matthews ahead of Eichel. I have heard this from more than one GM.
Also, for those of you putting the emphasis on "why are scouts there if the games don't matter?" comments: the scouts generally don't stay past the first round of cuts. Last year it went from every NHL team having a rep on day 2 (day 1 was relatively empty) to a handful sticking around after the cuts. I'm not there this year but I'd guess all the scouts left on the last day of there being 2 teams.
Laine is 18 months younger than Rantanen and he's already having an equally high impact to the game at Lake Placid. Laine has everything that Rantanen has plus an elite shot and scoring instincts. Laine is a superior prospect compared to Rantanen, there's no question about it.
I already admitted that I'm being a bit provocative in one of my earlier posts, but that's just to get some discussion going and challenge the belief that Matthews is the next Messiah. I don't think he's a clear-cut number one or a slam dunk NHL franchise centre in a few years, you need to have more than just pretty puck handling and some eye-catching plays for that.
It's quite understandable that Matthews was the consensus #1 on public lists after last season, but those rankings are quickly becoming even more irrelevant as the new season gears up and the outlook starts changing. Public lists often react with some delay to what's happening on the field, it certainly won't take 4-5 months for NHL teams to draw conclusions.
Can you educate me and provide some reasoning for this? There've been occasions where Eichel hasn't brought his A-game every night, but other than that I don't think Matthews has anything on Eichel. Both are dynamic, highly skilled and imaginative, but the strength and range of Eichel makes him much harder to contain. Furthermore, I think Eichel's ability to control the play and force his will is on an even higher level than with Matthews. Eichel proved that he can already make an impact against men at the World Championships, I have a hard time seeing Matthews doing the same next spring.
Last year was last year, the draft prospect setting in Lake Placid is noticeably better this year with Matthews, Laine, Puljujärvi and Tkachuk leading the way.
I don't think going to the big rink does much for him to be honest.
It's all about $$$$ IMO.
John Shannon says he's going to Zurich. Announcement later today.
Bummer, really wanted him to go to the WHL so I might be able to see him play. Really interested to see how he performs over there. Also really jealous he gets to live in Switzerland haha
Bummer, really wanted him to go to the WHL so I might be able to see him play. Really interested to see how he performs over there. Also really jealous he gets to live in Switzerland haha
NewBoysClub97*
All-Star
ZSC Lions also confirm it:
http://www.zsclions.ch/index.php?id=62&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=2897 (German)
http://www.zsclions.ch/index.php?id=62&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=2897 (German)
1Gold Standard
Registered User
- Jun 13, 2012
- 7,986
- 317
jameswrjobe53
Registered User
Wow! Excited to see him play for my team! Mier sind Züri! 
Edit: Apparently the visa issues could be resolved. Matthews is allowed to play for the team after his 18th birthday (September 18th).
Edit: Apparently the visa issues could be resolved. Matthews is allowed to play for the team after his 18th birthday (September 18th).
Stive Morgan
Last in NHL in blinks/60
Damn. As a Silvertips fan I wanted him in Everett. But this will interesting, especially if more prospects follow suit in the future.
krt88
Registered User
Why play for free when you can paid 6 figures! Smart move for him, I wouldn't seeing more top kids take this route.
Make a **** tonne and live abroad playing hockey. Gotta say that's an amazing life experience, but I honestly don't know what to make of it for his hockey development.
FolignoQuantumLeap
Don't Hold The Door
I'm surprised by the amount of people who think this is a good idea. I'm not necessarily saying its a bad decision, just people are so on board with the idea that this is the best course for his development. I find it hard to judge since I haven't seen him play much so I don't know whether he'd be so dominant in the CHL or NCAA that it would be a waste of time like some suggest (I don't think there has been a player in the history of the game where this was the case).
Serious question: is he just not willing to put in the work to go to the NCAA early like Eichel? Or is money really that big of an issue here?
Serious question: is he just not willing to put in the work to go to the NCAA early like Eichel? Or is money really that big of an issue here?
Good for him for making money and wanting to be a trend setter but this is a dumb move for his hockey career and draft stock. European hockey is a different game and honestly I don't think Matthews is the decisive #1. I would take Pulijarvi or Chychrun over him. I think him going to the NCAA would have been the best thing for him, good exposure and facing tough opponents, while getting the opportunity to work out often and get an education. But hey gotta follow the money I guess. I think this will hurt his draft stock especially if Pulijarvi turns it up a notch and Chychrun has a good season.
Wouldn't turning pro be more work than playing in the NCAA? Way more responsibility, way tougher schedule.
NLA isn't that tough a schedule.. easier than the WHL at least in terms of games played.
- Status
