ORRFForever
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2018
- 20,259
- 11,398
As well as timely scoring in the playoffs. Getz used to be a beast in the playoffs using his size and physicality to his advantage. He has the swagger like Getzlaf to be a beast in the playoffs.As a playmaker vs goalscorer yes, but in terms of agression probably Fantilli is closer to Getzlaf
18 y.o "choked" at a Senior World Championships. And they say I am harsh on Michkov LMAO.As well as timely scoring in the playoffs. Getz used to be a beast in the playoffs using his size and physicality to his advantage. He has the swagger like Getzlaf to be a beast in the playoffs.
It turns out that the only 1 out 10 scouts who didn't have Fantilli at #2 in Bob McKenzies list had Michkov at #2 and Fantilli at #3 so that means all 10 scouts had Fantilli above Carlsson, that is a slam dunk as it gets.
I just don't see Carlsson being as good in the playoffs, he seems more likely he'll be playoffs Marner/Matthews. When the push come to shove he choked terrible vs Latvia defensively and offensive while Fantilli stepped up while playing 4th line minutes to put Latvia away, Latvia that eliminated USA and Sweden.
Sweden was counting on Carlsson to be their hero and he didn't do the job. Canada didn't take Fantilli serious and he saved them vs Latvia. This shows to me that Fantilli is the guy who will do whatever it takes no matter what his role is. He is constantly working on his game.
One game doesn't decide who is or isn't clutch. Teams don't base that off of one tournament. Fantilli was on the 4th because his team was better and deeper than Sweden's. And Carlsson was only on the first because other top swedish centers didn't show up. Hockey is a team sport. What does it say if Sweden was counting on Carlsson but Canada was able to put Fantilli on the 4th? Fantilli played in two more games while averaging just slightly less TOI(13 for Carlsson, 12 for Fantilli) and still scored less than Carlsson did.As well as timely scoring in the playoffs. Getz used to be a beast in the playoffs using his size and physicality to his advantage. He has the swagger like Getzlaf to be a beast in the playoffs.
It turns out that the only 1 out 10 scouts who didn't have Fantilli at #2 in Bob McKenzies list had Michkov at #2 and Fantilli at #3 so that means all 10 scouts had Fantilli above Carlsson, that is a slam dunk as it gets.
I just don't see Carlsson being as good in the playoffs, he seems more likely he'll be playoffs Marner/Matthews. When the push come to shove he choked terrible vs Latvia defensively and offensive while Fantilli stepped up while playing 4th line minutes to put Latvia away, Latvia that eliminated USA and Sweden.
Sweden was counting on Carlsson to be their hero and he didn't do the job. Canada didn't take Fantilli serious and he saved them vs Latvia. This shows to me that Fantilli is the guy who will do whatever it takes no matter what his role is. He is constantly working on his game.
You can look back to what was discussed about their play in the world champs' thread, most posters here covered them plenty in much detail. Carlsson benefitted more from play of his linemates but he had to perform to stay there, which to his credit he did. Fantilli was a playdriver on each of his line combinations, outshooting and creating his linemates by far.One game doesn't decide who is or isn't clutch. Teams don't base that off of one tournament. Fantilli was on the 4th because his team was better and deeper than Sweden's. And Carlsson was only on the first because other top swedish centers didn't show up. Hockey is a team sport. What does it say if Sweden was counting on Carlsson but Canada was able to put Fantilli on the 4th? Fantilli played in two more games while averaging just slightly less TOI(13 for Carlsson, 12 for Fantilli) and still scored less than Carlsson did.
Well considering that Carlsson is a playmaker and not a goal scorer it's not surprising that Carlsson didn't shoot much. And then once again, Canada's roster make-up was much better than Sweden's. Hence Sweden putting a 18 year old at 1C vs Canada being able to put it's 18yr old on the 4th. First line minutes also means the toughest competition vs 4th line minutes and easier matchups.You can look back to what was discussed about their play in the world champs' thread, most posters here covered them plenty in much detail. Carlsson benefitted more from play of his linemates but he had to perform to stay there, which to his credit he did. Fantilli was a playdriver on each of his line combinations, outshooting and creating his linemates by far.
Also, Carlsson averaged 15:38 to Fantilli's 12:25, while getting outshot 12 to 24. Someone probably has the counting stats when it comes to expected goals, I'm not sure who has the lead but I' venture a guess it's much closer than the 2-to-1 shooting. Which both are clear wins for Fantilli given the circumstances.
Well. I just woke up so I could probably have a more detailed take if I was less groggy but another important difference is Carlsson had two years of experience playing against professional adults while Fantilli did it the first time at the WC. That's not necessarily a knock on Carlsson bit it's context for why he was better conditioned to handle his role than Fantilli.Well considering that Carlsson is a playmaker and not a goal scorer it's not surprising that Carlsson didn't shoot much. And then once again, Canada's roster make-up was much better than Sweden's. Hence Sweden putting a 18 year old at 1C vs Canada being able to put it's 18yr old on the 4th. First line minutes also means the toughest competition vs 4th line minutes and easier matchups.
While that's true, Fantilli also spent the last season mainly playing against older competition as a true freshman. And it was both of their first appearance at the Men's tournament.Well. I just woke up so I could probably have a more detailed take if I was less groggy but another important difference is Carlsson had two years of experience playing against professional adults while Fantilli did it the first time at the WC. That's not necessarily a knock on Carlsson bit it's context for why he was better conditioned to handle his role than Fantilli.
Let's also not overlook that the tournament was on the larger Euro ice surface and played under IIHF rules...both of which played to the advantage of Carlsson.While that's true, Fantilli also spent the last season mainly playing against older competition as a true freshman. And it was both of their first appearance at the Men's tournament.
Sweden was counting on Carlsson to be the hero and he didn't do the job.
Carlsson tire pumping in here too eh.
Right but there's a far cry difference between some whatever NCAA senior and a European pro who makes the national team. Like yeah they're the best of guys not good enough to play in the NHL but the SHL isn't some slouch league. In a small sample tournament, of course the guy who is used to playing bigger and faster bodies is going to adapt to the situation better. He also got the benefit of playing on the same line most of the tournament, or at least Lucas Raymond was the constant. Fantilli was bounced around until they settled on Lucic and Glass which was obviously not a good chemistry fit.While that's true, Fantilli also spent the last season mainly playing against older competition as a true freshman. And it was both of their first appearance at the Men's tournament.
Exactly. The better player is a coin flip so don't sweat it.I honestly don’t care which the Ducks get. They are both gonna be studs and I trust our scouts.
It appears like he's about to be Shane Wrighted to #4 overall.I think he’ll be the disappointment of the draft
I think this board is becoming an echo chamber of Carlsson fanboys / Fantilli detractors. Bob said 9 out of 10 scouts had Fantilli second and that was a bit of a reality check to me.I think he’ll be the disappointment of the draft
You’re stuck in a one-man echo chamber. It’s oddly impressive.I've come to accept that the Ducks will probably (80%) draft Carlsson, Columbus will draft Smith and SJ will get Fantilli.
As long as we don't end up with picking tiny man Michkov i'm happy with one of Smith, Carlsson or Fantilli. Michkov might never play in the NHL if Russian government suddenly changes its mind, it could be one of their ways of punishing the west or a dictator who wants the next Ovi to play only for Russia.
My guess is because he was underwhelming at the world juniors given the hype.I find it odd to see the amount of criticism Fantilli has received for a freshman player who has won the Hobey Baker and has his size/skillset.
Strange stuff and I've got to wonder what's really behind that.