Lord Ahriman
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2009
- 6,701
- 1,965
Makes sense.
The problem is that if they are willing to offer him seven years at 7.25 million why haven't they? The Swedish article seemed to imply that he knew they were in a cap crunch but wasn't going to take a discount to stay there and he wanted something long-term.
So that sounds to me like Anaheim is:
1. Trying to move another defenseman but asking too much.
2. Trying to get Lindholm to sign a bridge contract until Bieksa's money is off the books.
3. Only offering him money in the Hamilton range.
If any of these are true then you'd hope that a GM desperate for a #1 D and with four 1st available (only because he moved out assets to acquire those four firsts) would go the offer-sheet route and if Anaheim doesn't match, they keep their Fowler and Vatanen duo, bring in Theodore to play with Bieksa and keep the Bruins four 1sts to continue to be a strong team in the West.
If they match, the pressure is doubled to move Fowler which also works in the Bruins favour.
The Bruins have only $5.8M in cap space and 12F, 8D and 2G signed. Let's say you trade McQuaid, $8.5M in cap space. $0.8M (13th forward) + $1M for emergency call, give or take, $6.7M in cap space. So how exactly are you paying $7.25M for Lindholm?
Just to be clear, I have no problem paying the four 1sts, I just can't see that.