Proposal: Brodin to Habs

[2Pair]

The deal was Suzuki + Shlemko for Brodin

I was just trying to help you figure out that you don't know what you are talking about when it comes to Brodin. Suzuki and Schlemko don't get it done either.

 

[Cobra Commander]

I was just trying to help you figure out that you don't know what you are talking about when it comes to Brodin. Suzuki and Schlemko don't get it done either.

Of course Suzuki gets it done, you will never get a better prospect for Brodin.

 

[2Pair]

Of course Suzuki gets it done, you will never get a better prospect for Brodin.

If they can't do better than that, then he probably doesn't get moved.

 

[ole ole]

If they can't do better than that, then he probably doesn't get moved.

That's great for the Habs.

 

[Digitalbooya]

Suzuki>Brodin+Coyle.
Where did you see that. What post # again?
Or is this another typical TROLL post from you.

Here you go:

If you want Brodin+Coyle and you’re not willing to include Suzuki then at that point discussions end and I move on. Talk about ridiculous.

- Suzuki is not on the table. Try getting another grade A prospect who is developing very well from another team. Good luck. Habs pass.

"Or is this another typical TROLL post from you."

 

[Digitalbooya]

The deal was Suzuki + Shlemko for Brodin

When you completely miss the point of the post... He was saying Brodin has more value than Pacioretty and it's 100% true.

 

[57special]

Schlemko is a nothing for the Wild. Not needed, or wanted.

 

[Cobra Commander]

When you completely miss the point of the post... He was saying Brodin has more value than Pacioretty and it's 100% true.

Pacioretty is 100% a better player than Brodin.

As for value, with the 5 year age gap, the contracts and all that stuff, you will have to talk to Vegas fans about all that.

 

[Cobra Commander]

Schlemko is a nothing for the Wild. Not needed, or wanted.

He was the warm body throw in

 

[ole ole]

Here you go:




"Or is this another typical TROLL post from you."

You should add the rest of the post instead of picking certain lines to twist things.
Like i said B.S. post from a troll.

 

[rynryn]

IDK why you think Suzuki is worth Brodin but go ahead with your fantasy trade proposals I guess. Who's trying to move him? Why? We want to seriously hurt our saving grace this year (defense) we're going to go after more than a prospect to make up for it.

 

[ole ole]

When you completely miss the point of the post... He was saying Brodin has more value than Pacioretty and it's 100% true.

He was completely wrong.Top 1st line wingers have more value than #3/4 D's

 

[2Pair]

He was completely wrong.Top 1st line wingers have more value than #3/4 D's

nope

 

[Randy Randerson]

I like how you “liked” your buddy’s made up proposal.

Do you understand

Suzuki > any of your prospects

Brook > any of your prospects

Suzuki + Shlemko for Brodin is great for the Wild, it’s us who might start to regret it in 3 years.

I think it's pretty funny that you appealed to Wild fans to support your position, I threw it out there and the response was a resounding "lol, no Pacioretty is not more valuable than Brodin" and then all of those wild fans are "my buddies" all of a sudden. Super....well, Trumpian.

Anyway, your opinions keep delivering entertainment value, so keep it up

 

[Digitalbooya]

You should add the rest of the post instead of picking certain lines to twist things.
Like i said B.S. post from a troll.

Ah yes:

You completely missed the point of my post in your first paragraph. Tatar would be yet another left wing added to the cluster**** that is Parise, Zucker, Nino, Greenway, (and Granlund). Mete is a nice piece but I’m looking to address needs not trade for an unneeded LW, a downgrade at LD and a throw in of some kind while also giving up the only right shot consistently in Minnesota’s top 9.

If you want Brodin+Coyle and you’re not willing to include Suzuki then at that point discussions end and I move on. Talk about ridiculous.

No I didn't miss the point. Relax. I clearly broke down my point and did ask for clarity on a few things that you ignored.

- Tatar plays both wings. Did you not read that?

- Suzuki is not on the table. Try getting another grade A prospect who is developing very well from another team. Good luck. Habs pass.

The parts I took out had nothing to do with Suzuki>Brodin+Coyle. I took them out in order to save you reading time, which obviously was the wrong choice because it opened up the opportunity for more trolling to happen. The other parts were all about Brodin+Coyle for Tatar (not needed) + Mete (downgrade) + meh pieces. Then I said, "If you want Brodin+Coyle and you’re not willing to include Suzuki then at that point discussions end and I move on." To which the poster said, "Suzuki is not on the table. Try getting another grade A prospect who is developing very well from another team. Good luck. Habs pass."

Seems pretty clear. Surely even you can see that? Or are you just going to call me a troll again? I think I know the answer to that. Keep doing you, bro.

 

[Digitalbooya]

He was completely wrong.Top 1st line wingers have more value than #3/4 D's

Try again. Old wingers don't have more value than young top 4 defensemen.

 

[Vachon23]

I would be welling to give Poehling but not Suzuki

 

[ole ole]

Ah yes:




The parts I took out had nothing to do with Suzuki>Brodin+Coyle. I took them out in order to save you reading time, which obviously was the wrong choice because it opened up the opportunity for more trolling to happen. The other parts were all about Brodin+Coyle for Tatar (not needed) + Mete (downgrade) + meh pieces. Then I said, "If you want Brodin+Coyle and you’re not willing to include Suzuki then at that point discussions end and I move on." To which the poster said, "Suzuki is not on the table. Try getting another grade A prospect who is developing very well from another team. Good luck. Habs pass."

Seems pretty clear. Surely even you can see that? Or are you just going to call me a troll again? I think I know the answer to that. Keep doing you, bro.

And where exactly in that post does he claim that Suzuki>Brodin+Coyle. He doesn't. All he is saying is he's not interested in trading Suzuki. Now back to your misinterpreting post to suite your opinion.

 

[ole ole]

Try again. Old wingers don't have more value than young top 4 defensemen.

Well it seems your in the minority on that one.

A 30 yr old top 1st line winger have more value than your run of the mill 25 yr old #4 D. Quite easily i must add.

 

[Cobra Commander]

I think it's pretty funny that you appealed to Wild fans to support your position, I threw it out there and the response was a resounding "lol, no Pacioretty is not more valuable than Brodin" and then all of those wild fans are "my buddies" all of a sudden. Super....well, Trumpian.

Anyway, your opinions keep delivering entertainment value, so keep it up

Why are you rambling on about Pacioretty in A Brodin to Habs thread? What does anything have to do with Pacioretty?

Why is your agenda in this thread? Bash Habs players?

 

[Randy Randerson]

Why are you rambling on about Pacioretty in A Brodin to Habs thread? What does anything have to do with Pacioretty?

Why is your agenda in this thread? Bash Habs players?

you can read back to see how we got here, its all in chronological order

my agenda is more like "accurately value Habs players on a trade forum"

 

[Cobra Commander]

you can read back to see how we got here, its all in chronological order

my agenda is more like "accurately value Habs players on a trade forum"

What are you doing in this thread? You’re a Leafs fan/Habs hater, just here to argue.

 

[Randy Randerson]

What are you doing in this thread? You’re a Leafs fan/Habs hater, just here to argue.

participating in a main board thread, go back to the Habs forum if you want to homerate.

Brodin is a piece that the Leafs could use, came in to say that the Leafs would definitely outbid the OP, stayed for the lulz

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

Montreal isn't wrong to value Suzuki highly, just like we aren't wrong for valuing Kaprizov highly. The idea that Suzuki wouldn't be on the table for Brodin isn't wrong or insulting, it's their prerogative. Just like not trading Kaprizov for a guy like Zibanejad might be ours, even though he would fill an immediate need, as Brodin would for Montreal.

 

[ohmyjlord]

No, no, no, no !

Nothing against Brodin, but Montreal isn't in a position to start trading quality prospects for immediate help. This is the reason why this team is always "fighting for a playoff spot" instead of becoming great.

Keep Suzuki.
Keep Poehling.
Keep Kotkaniemi.
...and draft start focussing on D in the draft. If you're looking to add immediate help, wait for free agency. Don't throw away prospect. It's not that time yet.