Proposal: Brodin to Habs

[Mike Dukarm]

If the price for Brodin is Suzuki + ... Habs have to pass

 

[57special]

If the price for Brodin is Suzuki + ... Habs have to pass

OK!

 

[57special]

The Jets would trade Ves + Appleton for Brodin.

I think we both know that a trade between the two teams is unlikely to happen.

 

[Digitalbooya]

No, we learned that Dumba is far more valuable than we think he is.

Dumba injured mid-game f***ed the rotation. Everyone was out with Suter except Seeler. Hope he isn’t injured long term.

 

[Benstheman]

The only thing funnier than this post, is the fact there are people agreeing with it. Pull your heads out, fellas.

I know he's just been trade to Mtl but it was for a perennial 30 + goal scorer. And i know he was 1 year from UFA but in that case, it was accentuing his value since they agreed on the extension before making the deal, which is not the case with Brodin right now.

If you ask me which one had the best value between Pacioretty last summer and Brodin this coming summer?? I tell you Pacioretty without any doubt.

Pacioretty was traded for Suzuki, 2nd round and Tatar. The latter was a cap dump at that time and the cost to get him was probably the 2nd rounder or near that value. So it was most probably Pacioretty (with extension = for 5 years) for Suzuki straight up.

 

[Randy Randerson]

I know he's just been trade to Mtl but it was for a perennial 30 + goal scorer. And i know he was 1 year from UFA but in that case, it was accentuing his value since they agreed on the extension before making the deal, which is not the case with Brodin right now.

If you ask me which one had the best value between Pacioretty last summer and Brodin this coming summer?? I tell you Pacioretty without any doubt.

Pacioretty was traded for Suzuki, 2nd round and Tatar. The latter was a cap dump at that time and the cost to get him was probably the 2nd rounder or near that value. So it was most probably Pacioretty (with extension = for 5 years) for Suzuki straight up.

Tatar had just been acquired by Vegas last TDL for a 1st, 2nd and 3rd. He wasn't good there and they likely overpaid in the first place, but his value was still very positive

 

[Digitalbooya]

I know he's just been trade to Mtl but it was for a perennial 30 + goal scorer. And i know he was 1 year from UFA but in that case, it was accentuing his value since they agreed on the extension before making the deal, which is not the case with Brodin right now.

If you ask me which one had the best value between Pacioretty last summer and Brodin this coming summer?? I tell you Pacioretty without any doubt.

Pacioretty was traded for Suzuki, 2nd round and Tatar. The latter was a cap dump at that time and the cost to get him was probably the 2nd rounder or near that value. So it was most probably Pacioretty (with extension = for 5 years) for Suzuki straight up.

Pacioretty was playing at a 47 point pace last season at an age where a lot of players start to decline. No way he had more value during the off-season than Brodin will this upcoming offseason.

 

[2Pair]

I know he's just been trade to Mtl but it was for a perennial 30 + goal scorer. And i know he was 1 year from UFA but in that case, it was accentuing his value since they agreed on the extension before making the deal, which is not the case with Brodin right now.

If you ask me which one had the best value between Pacioretty last summer and Brodin this coming summer?? I tell you Pacioretty without any doubt.

Pacioretty was traded for Suzuki, 2nd round and Tatar. The latter was a cap dump at that time and the cost to get him was probably the 2nd rounder or near that value. So it was most probably Pacioretty (with extension = for 5 years) for Suzuki straight up.

so, delusional

 

[16thOverallSaveUs]

I know he's just been trade to Mtl but it was for a perennial 30 + goal scorer. And i know he was 1 year from UFA but in that case, it was accentuing his value since they agreed on the extension before making the deal, which is not the case with Brodin right now.

If you ask me which one had the best value between Pacioretty last summer and Brodin this coming summer?? I tell you Pacioretty without any doubt.

Pacioretty was traded for Suzuki, 2nd round and Tatar. The latter was a cap dump at that time and the cost to get him was probably the 2nd rounder or near that value. So it was most probably Pacioretty (with extension = for 5 years) for Suzuki straight up.

The fact that Patches had the year he had at a point in his career where it’s not unusual for players to decline is a major value killer. What made value even lower was that to get a trade done, they had to give him more money than he’s worth with term. I believe this trade is looking bad on Vegas solely for that contract.

 

[Digitalbooya]

The fact that Patches had the year he had at a point in his career where it’s not unusual for players to decline is a major value killer. What made value even lower was that to get a trade done, they had to give him more money than he’s worth with term. I believe this trade is looking bad on Vegas solely for that contract.

Currently pacing 29+23. I’d say it’s debatable on being worth it if he paces around 30 goals. I don’t expect him to keep it around the pace for the duration of the contract though and that would be the killer for me.

 

[Digitalbooya]

I’ve never seen a fanbase make 3 years to UFA seem so much like Brodin would be a rental. Really reaching...

 

[Benstheman]

Pacioretty was playing at a 47 point pace last season at an age where a lot of players start to decline. No way he had more value during the off-season than Brodin will this upcoming offseason.

Look at the price Vegas paid for him extended and you will understand they pay for a 1st line winger.

 

[Benstheman]

I’ve never seen a fanbase make 3 years to UFA seem so much like Brodin would be a rental. Really reaching...

He is not a rental but he is also not on a 5 years contract.

 

[Bruce Granville]

And why exactly would Brodin run out of town after his contract ends?

 

[57special]

Why is this still a thread?

 

[AKL]

He is not a rental but he is also not on a 5 years contract.

He’s also 25, not 30

 

[Digitalbooya]

Look at the price Vegas paid for him extended and you will understand they pay for a 1st line winger.

Nah, I think if it was a legit 1st line winger it would’ve cost way more to acquire.

He is not a rental but he is also not on a 5 years contract.

Pacioretty’s contract is going to look really ugly if his production falls anymore than it already has. Then the contract length is a real negative for Pacioretty’s value.

 

[Al Lagoon]

No, we learned that Dumba is far more valuable than we think he is.

Well, duh! Leading goal scorer of all d'men.

I've always thought his skill set was off the charts.

 

[Benstheman]

He’s also 25, not 30

True, but the age doesn't matter if he goes at the end of his contract.

 

[Benstheman]

Nah, I think if it was a legit 1st line winger it would’ve cost way more to acquire.

Pacioretty’s contract is going to look really ugly if his production falls anymore than it already has. Then the contract length is a real negative for Pacioretty’s value.

Doesn't matter if his contract looks ugly in 2 years, nor his value then. Vegas gave him 7M$/year, which is the money for a 1st line winger because they were considering him like one. And the gave a package to acquire the 1st line winger they think he is.