The parts I took out had nothing to do with Suzuki>Brodin+Coyle. I took them out in order to save you reading time, which obviously was the wrong choice because it opened up the opportunity for more trolling to happen. The other parts were all about Brodin+Coyle for Tatar (not needed) + Mete (downgrade) + meh pieces. Then I said, "If you want Brodin+Coyle and you’re not willing to include Suzuki then at that point discussions end and I move on." To which the poster said, "Suzuki is not on the table. Try getting another grade A prospect who is developing very well from another team. Good luck. Habs pass."
Seems pretty clear. Surely even you can see that? Or are you just going to call me a troll again? I think I know the answer to that. Keep doing you, bro.
1) I didn't call you a troll. You are dreaming here and trying to create something that is not there.
2) I asked clear questions to understand it from the Wild side of things. I think you got sensitive in your interpretation
3) Suzuki is off the table and yes, I did say good luck trying to get a prospect who is trending very well in their draft +1 and +2 years. Yes, I did say that several times. Cause it's my opinion.
Brodin is a solid top 4D but with limited offensive production. 20-25 pts / Top 4D who plays good overall game and has 3 years in term left. Teams are not going to line up offering a prospect like Suzuki who is trending very well 2 years after being drafted. But hey, there is always a sucker GM, I do with the Wild luck but Suzuki is not on the table from the Habs.