Confirmed with Link: Brind'Amour named head coach

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
I can accept the personnel issue on the PP. I’d like to hear directly that Peters mandated the 50/50 split. That Ryan/Skinner/Hanifin 2nd unit had no business being on the ice as much as it was.

Nobody can know if Rod will succeed or fail as a Head Coach. For sure we will find out. Like he said himself, boom or bust.
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,868
28,957
Cary, NC
Lol

So who did you want? Mike Babcock? Paul Maurice is pretty good, right? Even though he was ****ty here for years and everything was his fault. Or maybe Mike Keenan?

Good players have a way of making good coaches. Good thing we've got some better players coming.

We need better goaltending. Period. The rest of this is noise because everyone's mad.

Hank Likes Our Group
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
87,188
146,486
Bojangles Parking Lot
Basically fluff and stuff that has been stated already.

As for the last sentence, I don't see how anyone can say it's true.

No one knows how much autonomy he's had, and if he's had any at all as an assistant coach then this looks even worse.

I wouldn’t call it a fluff article. He names some pretty specific situations where Brind’Amour took a necessary back seat to other leaders in the organization, then stepped forward and thrived when given the opportunity.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
I wouldn’t call it a fluff article. He names some pretty specific situations where Brind’Amour took a necessary back seat to other leaders in the organization, then stepped forward and thrived when given the opportunity.

Peter principle - Wikipedia

Brind’Amour is the poster child for a hard worker who those around him say should be promoted. He’s earned that in every stage of his career, at least from an internal perception standpoint.
 

garnetpalmetto

Jerkministrator
Jul 12, 2004
12,476
11,842
Durham, NC
Aren't his kids all in college now? I mean that would actually make sense.

Yeah I believe so. I was just lol'ing at her comment of "Best news in a while for CAR".

I looked at this last year when his house hit the market so here's the update:

Briley (20), his daughter, is finishing up her sophomore year at James Madison, where she plays on their volleyball team.

Skyler (18), his oldest son, is getting ready to enroll at Michigan State in the fall, where he'll play hockey. He was drafted by the Oilers in the 6th round of last year's draft

Reece (17 or 18), his middle son, is finishing up his senior year in high school, so he'll be getting ready to move on to college in the fall

That leaves his youngest soon, Brooks, who's 6.
 

Wolfpuck

Jarvy Had To Do It To ‘Em
Jun 25, 2006
39,160
87,325
The 919
I looked at this last year when his house hit the market so here's the update:

Briley (20), his daughter, is finishing up her sophomore year at James Madison, where she plays on their volleyball team.

Skyler (18), his oldest son, is getting ready to enroll at Michigan State in the fall, where he'll play hockey. He was drafted by the Oilers in the 6th round of last year's draft

Reece (17 or 18), his middle son, is finishing up his senior year in high school, so he'll be getting ready to move on to college in the fall

That leaves his youngest soon, Brooks, who's 6.
Brooks for PP coach?
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
25,413
44,426
colorado
Visit site
Hurricanes Name Rod Brind'Amour as Head Coach

Official. And Waddell new President and GM.
I love how it’s completely snuck in that Waddell is the new gm. It’s not even a headline, Brind’Amour is.

This is some bull shit right here. Can we find some quotes from Don saying he wasn’t going to be GM?

TD found his yes man from the get go. The whole bit about interviewing the top candidates was a sham.

And how is anyone on the team getting a fresh start? Maybe Brindy has a different take vs Peters on some guys but both Waddell and Brindy have been right there for years. There’s no fresh take here. Just picking the parts they didn’t like about Peters/RF apart.
 

Anton Dubinchuk

aho
Sponsor
Jul 18, 2010
26,908
58,207
Atlanta, GA
I love how it’s completely snuck in that Waddell is the new gm. It’s not even a headline, Brind’Amour is.

This is some bull **** right here. Can we find some quotes from Don saying he wasn’t going to be GM?

TD found his yes man from the get go. The whole bit about interviewing the top candidates was a sham.

Lol thinking about those interviews...

Dundon: “would you be willing to... CLIP MY TOENAILS”

Futa: “umm... no?”
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
52,429
52,786
Winston-Salem NC
I love how it’s completely snuck in that Waddell is the new gm. It’s not even a headline, Brind’Amour is.

This is some bull **** right here. Can we find some quotes from Don saying he wasn’t going to be GM?

TD found his yes man from the get go. The whole bit about interviewing the top candidates was a sham.

And how is anyone on the team getting a fresh start? Maybe Brindy has a different take vs Peters on some guys but both Waddell and Brindy have been right there for years. There’s no fresh take here. Just picking the parts they didn’t like about Peters/RF apart.

He Dick Cheney'd the f*** out of this thing.
And if it gets out that he was actively sabotaging Ron Francis in regards to his relation with Dundon it's full on Phil Fulmer.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,652
103,485
Disagree a little there. I think there are many teams and coaches that turn a team into something greater than the sum of its parts. I don’t think any can argue the forwards were that this year. In fact I’d argue we did the opposite this year.

There are degress of effectiveness of a coach. I think assistant coaches have MUCH less impact on the game as the players or head coach does. The assistant coach has little autonomy, as while they may participate in system and personnel decision, they ultimately rely on the head coach. Rod's job is to effectively manage the forwards within the constraints of what Bill Peters demand.

IMO: A good head coach can take a bad team and make them "ok". He can take an OK team and make them good. He can take a good team, and make them even better. No head coach though is going to take a bad team and make them good-great.

You want to hire a guy with literally not a shred of evidence he’s a good coach? Hire me. I’ll do it, and I’ll do it for half of what you paid Peters.

And there's the problem with this. YOU and I don't have a shred of evidence if he's a good coach, but there are people within the organization who may certainly have a good idea about it. That's because we see less than 5% of what he does, they see most of what he does. We are making assumptions based on lack of data, they are making assumptions with insight to that data.

I'm not saying they'll be right, but they certainly have way more insight than we have. Rod certainly would not be my choice given the limited data.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
25,413
44,426
colorado
Visit site
And where’s all that “we want to find new talent that is willing to prove itself at a fair price” now?

Waddell and Dudley?!?

I like Dudley but there’s nothing new and exciting going on with this group. What about Vellucci?

Our brave first step into the new world of the NHL is to bring in 2003.

I’m so annoyed about Waddell it’s distracting me about how I feel about Brindy being given the reins with zero head coaching experience.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,652
103,485
Yeah, but how can anyone know if he was good or bad given those circumstances? Seems like a crap-shoot to me. And the guy making this decisions has been very public about his lack of hockey knowledge within the last 5 months. So either he got real educated real quick, or we are going on wishes and prayers.

Oh, I don't disagree at all with this. We don't know either way so I would rather have a guy with more experience.
 

Anton Dubinchuk

aho
Sponsor
Jul 18, 2010
26,908
58,207
Atlanta, GA
Oh, I don't disagree at all with this. We don't know either way so I would rather have a guy with more experience.

That’s the dumb thing about coaching though, even the guys with years worth of evidence are still debated.

Is AV a good coach? NO ONE ****ING KNOWS!

It’s one of the least known aspects of hockey by the fans.
 

CanesUltimate11

Registered User
Nov 24, 2008
2,241
6,449
Northern Virginia
flat,800x800,070,f.u6.jpg
 

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,774
9,250
I like the idea of Rod as a head coach. As a player, he did everything well through intelligence and hard work. Offense, defense, PK, and PP. He just seems like the kind of guy who understands the game on a really high level. And I get the sense he's going to be good for getting the most out of the players. He strikes me as a guy people want to follow.

But damn, wouldn't it be nice to go into a season not worrying if the head coach was any good for a change? It's been pretty similar to finding Cam's replacement. Khudobin, Lack, and Darling. All of them could have been the guy, but instead, we blew through 5 or 6 seasons. If they just bit the bullet, and spent what it took to get a good NHL goalie instead of rolling the dice. Seems like Muller, Peters, Brindy might be the same exact thing.

If we are going to take a flyer with the HC position, though, Brindamour is a fun choice.
 

CandyCanes

Caniac turned Jerkiac
Jan 8, 2015
7,796
27,245
To me the strangest thing about all of this is Dundon's very clearly-stated philosophy that failure is unacceptable, and when you fail then you necessarily need to address everything you did, top-to-bottom. That justified firing Francis, and it justified running Peters out of town. The results weren't good enough. Failure is unacceptable. Disruption is necessary to move forward.

Then he hires Brind'Amour, who has assistant-coached this team to zero playoff seasons since 2011, was development coach during a period that we had virtually no development success, and oversaw one of the worst power plays in the NHL over the past several seasons. He has literally nothing on his coaching record BUT failure, why are we putting him in charge if failure is not an option?

Uhh are you forgetting that he's coached us to be the best faceoff team in the league?! Come on give this man some credit....
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad