Now do actual results not pace and per/60
for those 2, Tim wins.
Still dodging original question lmao.
Here is what started it, it was a discussion on Bratt and Tim, NOT JACK, and you were comparing Bratts last 3 years not first 3 years.
Yet somehow you’ve dodged and moved the goalposts again. Stop being obtuse and dodging and weaving, but at least your good at it.
If it was 2 or 3 very strong years (they're all strong but I assume you know what I mean by this), followed by an injured year, I'd be much more forgiving.
Bratt has done it 3 years straight (first is All situations, second EV)
View attachment 900975
View attachment 900976
And once again, I have stutzle over bratt based on age and positional value long term. I also have him over Tkachuk, as I have stated here.
I expect him to develop further.
I don't have him over Hischier, and he is not close to Jack.
When he shows me a second season at a high level, I will shoot him up my rankings.
If you want me to move him above nico despite nico being better every single year, that is something I will not do until he SHOWS me.
Your argument is that Tim Stutzle has played more.
My counter is that, in order to make up the difference between Stutzle and Jacks 20-21 seasons (jack played through injury his age 20 season btw).
You need 5 points, and -12 goals.
You get 720 minutes of ice time to do that (with top 6 talent around), including 160 minutes on the power play (with PP1 talent around).
You could stick ECHLers out there for the missing minutes and they'd be able to bridge that gap.