I didn’t say difinitive, I said less and less likely. As in she was already engaging using her own phone in childish texting, yet it turns out that she was also sending 1000’s of harassing messages from an untraceable burner or something on the side. There is a big difference between being petty and childish, and being pathological while savvy enough to stay untraceable. This is why things didn’t go any further for the Karlssons, but the Hoffman’s continued their pursuit of social innocence, looking into legal means as well. Not exactly what guilty folk do.That's the thing, you're not much different from Agent Zub when it comes to trying to broaden your perspectives on a situation. You're not exactly open to the notion that EK didn't do anything wrong.
As the details come out, it is not definitive that its less and less likely that Hoffman's gf was innocent. Only way to prove it was her was to link an IP address to Hoff's gf, which is incredibly different to do. There's numerous statements that show her to be an irrational person who had a childish dislike of EK's wife. But no one can prove anything, it's a he-said-she-said situation.
The only definitive thing anyone can say was that it was an incredibly shitty situation and that we don't know exactly what happened. Based on that it doesn't make sense to question either Hoff's or EK character/leadership. I don't, I'm not sure if other posters do, but you've made it clear that you question EK as a person even though we don't know what happened.
It seems a bit trite to sum it up as a shitty situation when one party was factually responsible for the shitty situation of the other though.
You say that no one can prove anything, but that’s the point right? One party levelled an accusation on the other, and the other suffered tremendous social and career consequences for it. When proof was demanded by one party, the other party declined to do so and turned the page on the whole thing.
It will be interesting to see how the Formenton situation pans out as well. I have learned over the years that condemning people without evidence is a popular pastime.