One thing about trades, I do recall immense praise for Treliving last off season on how well he did, given the horrible cards he was dealt. As we sit here today, it looks different, but at the time, the hockey world was very impressed with his moves. And I do wonder what would have happened in Calgary last year had ownership let him can Sutter like he wanted to, the team had obvious internal issues.
This is so true.
I genuinely hate this about HFboards in general. We are afforded the ability to apply hindsight to our judgements, where GM's/Coaches/Players are making these decisions in real time. If you can stand behind the decisions in real time, you should not be critical of the GM/Coach/Player if the outcome does not work out in your favor.
Brad was rightfully applauded for his work on the Tkachuk deal, as he was dealt a terrible hand with his trade request. The amount of people pulling out the hindsight gun on this one is pathetic IMO. The overwhelming consensus last year when the deal was made is that Brad did very well given the set of circumstances he faced.
Sometimes deals jus don't work out. It just is what it is.
And lets not pretend like Calgary was some shit team last season. They had historically bad goaltending, and the Daryl Sutter experiment was clearly running out of steam. I would not be surprised if they return to some level of competitiveness as early as next season.
I am not trying to dissolve Brad of any blame in Calgary, but he wasn't exactly given a full deck of cards to work with. Ownership is a complete nightmare, and he has been fighting an uphill battle trying to convince guys to become or stay on as Flames his entire tenure. I just don't think either of those things will be the case in Toronto TBH